No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundCancer is a devastating disease and has detrimental effects on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors and interferes with their treatment compliance. The aim of the study is to assess resilience and QoL among cancer survivors and to evaluate the important factors affecting their resilience and QoL, with respect to the Pakistani cultural context.Method and analysisA cross-sectional study will be conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. A minimum sample size of 250 head and neck cancers and 250 brain tumour survivors with 10% inflation for non-response rate will be required. The SD of QoL and resilience will range from 16.5 to 40.8 for head and neck cancer, and 12.7 to 34.1 for brain tumour, at 5% level of significance, with 2.5 precision. QoL will be assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 and resilience will be evaluated by Wagnild and Young’s 14-item scale. Mean±SD will be reported for resilience and QoL scores. Unadjusted and adjusted β-coefficients, with 95% CI, will be reported by using multiple linear regression analysis. Correlation analysis will also be performed using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients. A p value of <0.05 will be considered significant.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Aga Khan University Pakistan’s Ethical Review Committee. Written informed consent will be taken from the participants by trained research assistants. A trained psychologist will provide on-spot counselling to the participants and those identified with severe depression will be referred to a psychiatrist. The study materials will be kept under lock and key and the electronic data base will be password protected and will only be accessed by the research team. The study findings will be disseminated through publications conferences and workshops and research briefs.Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03466762).

The rates of blood pressure screening in Pakistan are worryingly low, calling for the establishment of a nationwide programme to improve detection, awareness and treatment of hypertension.

PURPOSE The age at which women present with breast cancer varies widely among nations, and breast cancer may behave differently in younger women. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics based on age have not been well characterized in Pakistani patients with breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of patients with symptoms of breast cancer presenting to Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), a large tertiary care center in Pakistan, between 2001 and 2010; we compared young (≤ 40 years) versus older (> 40 years) patients in terms of their clinicopathological characteristics. We also compared this Pakistani cohort with the US population using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). RESULTS A total of 1,334 patients with breast cancer presented to our center over the 10-year review period. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years, compared with 60 years for patients in the NCDB. In the AKUH cohort, younger patients were significantly more likely than their older counterparts to present with metastatic disease (13.1% v 10.8%; P < .01). They also were more likely to present with higher-grade tumors (grade 3: 40.1% v 28.3%; P < .001), have triple hormone receptor–negative phenotype (25.4% v 14.1%, P < .001), and have positive axillary lymph node involvement (70.9% v 57.5%; P < .001) compared with older women. Younger and older patients in the AKUH cohort tended to present with higher-stage disease ( P < .001) and were more likely to have triple hormone receptor–negative disease ( P < .001), compared with all patients in the NCDB and with those of Indo-Pakistani origin. CONCLUSION Young Pakistani women, similar to their Western counterparts, present with more advanced disease and more aggressive tumor biology than their older counterparts.

BackgroundData from several published studies indicate that patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery can experience a variety of visual sensations which can result in fear. This phenomenon has not been studied in Pakistan to-date. We examined the visual experience and its associated fear among patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in Aga Khan University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital, in Karachi, Pakistan from August 2010 to July 2011. Adults >18 years of age scheduled to undergo cataract surgery (phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation) under topical anaesthesia by a single surgeon were included. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographics, intraoperative visual experiences and subsequent reaction to these sensations. Participants were asked if they experienced visual sensations such as colours, shapes and movements during surgery. Moreover, they were asked if they developed fear due to these sensations.ResultsFifty three patients (mean age: 60.4 ± 12.4 years) were enrolled. Thirty (56.6%) of them were men and 23 (43.4%) were women. All of them reported having experienced visual sensations during surgery, the most common being light perception (100%), different colours (77.4%), movements of instruments or surgeon’s hands (37.7%) and different shapes (7.5%) such as circles, clouds and patches. The most common colours perceived included white (46.2%), blue (35.8%), red (30.2%) and yellow (30.2%). One out of every four (26.4%) participants reported having developed fear due to these visual sensations. Only 4 (7.5%) reported having received preoperative counselling regarding such sensations.ConclusionPatients in our study experienced a variety of visual sensations during cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia. The prevalence of frightening visual sensations is higher than that reported in all previous published studies on the subject and needs to be addressed through targeted interventions.

Objectives This study assessed resilience in brain tumor patients at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan (a lower middle‐income country; LMIC) and explored its relationship with patients' sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, social support, and mental health. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was conducted amongst adult (≥18 years) patients with brain tumor at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan. Resilience was assessed by Wagnild and Young's Resilience Scale, and patients' psychosocial characteristics by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Enriched Social Support Instrument. Results A total of 250 patients were included (mean age: 44 years; 68% males), with majority (97.6%) having high social support and only 4.4% and 2% having symptomatic depression and anxiety, respectively. On multivariable linear regression adjusted for covariates, lower resilience was associated with not being involved in household decision‐making (Adjusted Beta Coefficient: 4.58 [95% Confidence Interval:−7.59, −1.56]), not currently working (−2.80 [−4.61, −0.99]), undergoing multiple neurosurgical interventions such as tumor biopsies or resections (−8.64 [−13.11, −4.16]), receiving chemotherapy (−5.17 [−9.51, −0.83]) or combination adjuvant therapy (−2.91 [−5.14, −0.67]), low social support (−7.77 [−13.73, 1.81]), mild depression (−13.00 [‐17.00,‐8.99]) or symptomatic depression (−19.79 [−24.69, −14.89]), and mild anxiety (−4.24 [−7.98, −0.50]). Conclusion Our study highlights the function of familial/household role and working status in mediating resilience, and demonstrates the well‐known protective effect of resilience for mental health in brain tumor patients in Pakistan, a South‐Asian LMIC. These findings are of clinical relevance with regards to the development of culture‐specific evidence‐based resilience‐building interventions that may help patients with brain tumors to cope with the psychological distress of cancer.

Access to eye care in this marginalized population is substantially hindered by perceived lack of need, financial hardships, and a range of "fears" and anxieties, despite a large unmet need. These barriers should be addressed while paying particular attention to gender, and ethnic and socioeconomic differences.