BackgroundHuman adenovirus type 55 (HAdV55) has a re-emerged as pathogen causing an acute respiratory disease presenting as a severe lower respiratory illness that can cause death. To date, there is no HAdV55 vaccine or treatment available for general use.MethodsHerein, a monoclonal antibody specific for HAdV55, mAb 9-8, was isolated from an scFv-phage display library derived from mice immunized with the purified inactived-HAdV55 virions. By using ELISA and a virus micro-neutralization assay, we evaluated the binding and neutralizing activity of mAb 9-8 following humanization. Western blotting analysis and antigen-antibody molecular docking analysis were used to identify the antigenic epitopes that the humanized monoclonal antibody 9-8-h2 recognized. After that, their thermal stability was determined.ResultsMAb 9-8 showed potent neutralization activity against HAdV55. After humanization, the humanized neutralizing monoclonal antibody (9-8-h2) was identified to neutralize HAdV55 infection with an IC50 of 0.6050 nM. The mAb 9-8-h2 recognized HAdV55 and HAdV7 virus particles, but not HAdV4 particles. Although mAb 9-8-h2 could recognize HAdV7, it could not neutralize HAdV7. Furthermore, mAb 9-8-h2 recognized a conformational neutralization epitope of the fiber protein and the crucial amino acid residues (Arg 288, Asp 157, and Asn 200) were identified. MAb 9-8-h2 also showed favorable general physicochemical properties, including good thermostability and pH stability.ConclusionsOverall, mAb 9-8-h2 might be a promising molecule for the prevention and treatment of HAdV55.
Aim
The main objective of this study was to explore the value of the discharged case fatality rate (DCFR) in estimating the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19 in China.
Subjects and methods
Epidemiological data on COVID-19 in China and Hubei Province were obtained from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China from January 20, 2020, to March 31, 2020. The number of daily new confirmed cases, daily confirmed deaths, daily recovered cases, the proportion of daily deaths and total deaths of discharged cases were collected, and the total discharge case fatality rate (tDCFR), daily discharge case fatality rate (dDCFR), and stage-discharge case fatality rate (sDCFR) were calculated. We used the R software (version 3.6.3, R core team) to apply a trimmed exact linear time method to search for changes in the mean and variance of dDCFR in order to estimate the pandemic phase from dDCFR.
Results
The tDCFR of COVID-19 in China was 4.16% until March 31, 2020. According to the pattern of dDCFR, the pandemic was divided into four phases: the transmission phase (from January 20 to February 2), the epidemic phase (from February 3 to February 14), the decline phase (from February 15 to February 22), and the sporadic phase (from February 23 to March 31). The sDCFR for these four phases was 43.18% (CI 39.82–46.54%), 13.23% (CI 12.52–13.94%), 5.86% (CI 5.49–6.22%), and 1.61% (CI 1.50–1.72%), respectively.
Conclusion
DCFR has great value in assessing the severity and epidemic trend of COVID-19.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01895-4.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.