Elevated pain-related fear of movement/reinjury, quadriceps weakness, and reduced IKDC score distinguish patients who are unable to return to preinjury sports participation because of fear of reinjury/lack of confidence. Despite low average pain ratings, fear of pain may influence function in this subgroup. Assessment of fear of reinjury, quadriceps strength, and self-reported function at 6 months may help identify patients at risk for not returning to sports at 1 year and should be considered for inclusion in return-to-sport guidelines.

Background Laboratory-based studies on neuromuscular control after concussion and epidemiological studies suggest that concussion may increase the risk of subsequent musculoskeletal injury. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine if athletes have an increased risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal injury after return-to-play from a concussion. Methods Injury data were collected from 2006–2013 for men’s football and women’s basketball, soccer, and lacrosse at a NCAA Division I university. Ninety cases in 73 athletes (52 Male, 21 Female) of in-season concussion with return-to-play at least 30 days prior to the end of the season were identified. A period of up to 90 days of in-season competition following return-to-play was reviewed for time-loss injury. The same period was studied in up to two control athletes who were without a concussion within the prior year and were matched on sport, starting status, and position. Results Lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries occurred at a higher rate in the concussed athletes (45/90 or 50%) compared to the non-concussed athletes (30/148 or 20%) (p < 0.01). The odds of sustaining a musculoskeletal injury were 3.39 times higher in the concussed athletes (95% CI = 1.90, 6.05; p < 0.01). Overall, the number of days lost due to injury was similar between concussed and non-concussed athletes (Median = 9 vs 15, p = 0.41). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate a relationship between concussion and an increased risk of lower extremity musculoskeletal injury after return to play, and may have implications for current medical practice standards regarding the evaluation and management of concussion injuries.

No abstract

No abstract

Measures of central pain processing like conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and suprathreshold heat pain response (SHPR) have been described to assess different components of central pain modulatory mechanisms. Central pain processing potentially play a role in the development of postsurgical pain, however, the role of CPM and SHPR in explaining postoperative clinical pain and disability is still unclear. Seventy eight patients with clinical shoulder pain were included in this study. Patients were examined before shoulder surgery, at 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity and upper extremity disability. Analyses revealed that the change score (baseline – 3 months) of 5th pain rating of SHPR accounted for a significant amount of variance in 6 month postsurgical clinical pain intensity and disability after age, sex, preoperative pain intensity, and relevant psychological factors were considered. The present study suggests that baseline measures of central pain processing were not predictive of 6 month postoperative pain outcome. Instead, the 3 month change in SHPR might be a relevant factor in the transition to elevated 6-month postoperative pain and disability outcomes. In patients with shoulder pain, the 3 month change in a measure of central pain processing might be a relevant factor in the transition to elevated 6-month postoperative pain and disability scores.

Functional performance testing is often used in lower extremity rehabilitation to help determine a patient's readiness to return to sports participation. 2,11,25,28 Hopping or jumping tasks are most commonly used, 3,18,25,28 but other types of tasks also exist. 2,15Functional performance tests impart high forces to an injured joint or body segment that may more closely replicate the forces experienced in sport. Consequently, these tests can reveal impairments in muscle force generation or proprioception and neuromuscular control that might not be obvious with other clinical measures. 7,19Several studies have found that lower extremity functional performance test results predict future functional outcome, 1,8,12,21,22 indicating their usefulness in lower extremity rehabilitation.Functional performance testing is not standard in upper extremity rehabilitation and is absent from most upper extremity rehabilitation protocols. 5,23,27 The lack of functional performance testing occurs in spite of several functional performance tests described for the upper extremity. 4,6,17,24 A dearth of research to guide the selection and implementation of upper extremity functional performance tests may be a barrier to more widespread clinical use.The unilateral seated shot put test is an upper extremity functional performance test with many appealing aspects for clinical use. The test requires pushing a weighted ball forward in a shot put motion. 16 The test requires little equipment and would therefore be easy to administer in most clinical settings. Distance thrown on the unilateral seated shot put test has shown positive correlation with distance on a softball throw, providing external validity. 17 Moreover, in a sample T T STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. T T OBJECTIVES:To examine the effect of different normalization methods on unilateral seated shot put test results. T T BACKGROUND:The unilateral seated shot put test could assist clinical decision making in upper extremity rehabilitation, but test results must be normalized to compare across patients. The effect of normalization methods based on body size and upper-limb dominance is unknown. T T METHODS:One hundred twenty-five collegiate athletes (63 males) performed the unilateral seated shot put test with each upper extremity. Anthropometric measures (height, body mass, arm length) and distance thrown were recorded. Normalization based on body size included ratio scaling and allometric scaling. Ratio scaling was performed with the anthropometric measure having the highest correlation to distance thrown (distance/anthropometric measure). Allometric scaling was performed with body mass raised to the theoretical exponent 0.67 (distance/body mass 0.67 ) and a derived exponent. Correlations of nonnormalized and normalized values with body mass were then determined. The limb symmetry index [(dominant-side distance/nondominantside distance) × 100] was used for normalization based on limb dominance. Sex differences were examined. T T RESULTS:Body mass was selected for ratio...

Although outcomes of shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasties have been well-described, there have been no studies directly comparing the outcomes of these procedures as treatments for osteoarthritis. We compared the inpatient mortality, complications, length of stay, and total charges of patients who had shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with those of patients who had hip and knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis. A review of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission discharge database identified 994 shoulder arthroplasties, 15,414 hip arthroplasties, and 34,471 knee arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis from 1994 to 2001. There were no in-hospital deaths after shoulder arthroplasty, whereas 27 (0.18%) and 54 (0.16%) deaths occurred after hip and knee arthroplasties, respectively. Compared with patients who had hip or knee arthroplasties, patients who had shoulder arthroplasties had, on average, a lower complication rate, a shorter length of stay, and fewer total charges. The latter had 1/2 as many in-hospital complications, were 1/6 as likely to have a length of stay 6 days or greater, and were 1/10 as likely to be charged more than $15,000. We believe shoulder arthroplasty is as safe as the more commonly performed major joint arthroplasties.

One major concern regarding soft tissue allograft use in surgical procedures is the risk of disease transmission. Current techniques of tissue sterilization, such as irradiation have been shown to adversely affect the mechanical properties of soft tissues. Grafts processed using Biocleanse processing (a proprietary technique developed by Regeneration Technologies to sterilize human tissues) will have better biomechanical characteristics than tissues that have been irradiated. Fifteen pairs of cadaveric Achilles tendon allografts were obtained and separated into three groups of 10 each. Three treatment groups were: Biocleanse, Irradiated, and Control (untreated). Each specimen was tested to determine the biomechanical properties of the tissue. Specimens were cyclically preloaded and then loaded to failure in tension. During testing, load, displacement, and optical strain data were captured. Following testing, the cross sectional area of the tendons was determined. Tendons in the control group were found to have a higher extrinsic stiffness (slope of the load-deformation curve, p = .005), have a higher ultimate stress (force/cross sectional area, p = .006) and higher ultimate failure load (p = .003) than irradiated grafts. Biocleanse grafts were also found to be stiffer than irradiated grafts (p = .014) yet were not found to be statistically different from either irradiated or non-irradiated grafts in terms of load to failure. Biocleanse processing seems to be a viable alternative to irradiation for Achilles tendon allografts sterilization in terms of their biomechanical properties.