This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Objective:To identify the best quantitative fat-water MRI biomarker for disease progression of leg muscles in Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) by applying a stepwise approach based on standardized response mean (SRM) over 24 months, correlations with baseline ambulatory tests and reproducibility.Methods:Dixon fat-water imaging was performed at baseline (n=24) and 24 months (n=20). Fat fractions (FF) were calculated for three center slices and the whole muscles for 19 muscles and six muscle groups. Contractile cross sectional area (cCSA) was obtained from the center slice. Functional assessments included knee extension and flexion force, and three ambulatory tests (North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), 10-meter run, six-minute walking test). MR parameters were selected using SRM (≥0.8) and correlation with all ambulatory tests (rho≤-0.8). Parameters were evaluated based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard deviation (SD) of the difference. Sample sizes (SS) were calculated assuming 50% reduction in disease progression over 24 months in a clinical trial with 1:1 randomization.Results:Median whole muscle FF increased between 0.2-2.6% without consistent cCSA changes. High SRMs and strong functional correlations were found for eight FF but no cCSA parameters. All parameters showed excellent ICC (≥0.999) and similar SD of the inter-rater difference. Whole thigh three center slices FF was the best biomarker (SRM=1.04, correlations rho≤-0.81, ICC=1.00, SD=0.23%, SS=59) based on low SD and acquisition and analysis time.Conclusion:In BMD, median FF of all muscles increased over 24 months. Whole thigh three center slices FF reduced the SS by approximately 40% compared to NSAA.
Although quantitative MRI can be instrumental in the diagnosis and assessment of disease progression in orbital diseases involving the extra‐ocular muscles (EOM), acquisition can be challenging as EOM are small and prone to eye‐motion artefacts. We explored the feasibility of assessing fat fractions (FF), muscle volumes and water T2 (T2 water ) of EOM in healthy controls (HC), myasthenia gravis (MG) and Graves' orbitopathy (GO) patients. FF, EOM volumes and T2 water values were determined in 12 HC (aged 22‐65 years), 11 MG (aged 28‐71 years) and six GO (aged 28‐64 years) patients at 7 T using Dixon and multi‐echo spin‐echo sequences. The EOM were semi‐automatically 3D‐segmented by two independent observers. MANOVA and t‐tests were used to assess differences in FF, T2 water and volume of EOM between groups ( P < .05). Bland–Altman limits of agreement (LoA) were used to assess the reproducibility of segmentations and Dixon scans. The scans were well tolerated by all subjects. The bias in FF between the repeated Dixon scans was −0.7% (LoA: ±2.1%) for the different observers; the bias in FF was −0.3% (LoA: ±2.8%) and 0.03 cm 3 (LoA: ± 0.36 cm 3 ) for volume. Mean FF of EOM in MG (14.1% ± 1.6%) was higher than in HC (10.4% ± 2.5%). Mean muscle volume was higher in both GO (1.2 ± 0.4 cm 3 ) and MG (0.8 ± 0.2 cm 3 ) compared with HC (0.6 ± 0.2 cm 3 ). The average T2 water for all EOM was 24.6 ± 4.0 ms for HC, 24.0 ± 4.7 ms for MG patients and 27.4 ± 4.2 ms for the GO patient. Quantitative MRI at 7 T is feasible for measuring FF and muscle volumes of EOM in HC, MG and GO patients. The measured T2 water was on average comparable with skeletal muscle, although with higher variation between subjects. The increased FF in the EOM in MG patients suggests that EOM involvement in MG is accompanied by fat replacement. The unexpected EOM volume increase in MG may provide novel insights into underlying pathophysiological processes.
ObjectiveTo validate the repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (RoVEMP) test for diagnostic use in myasthenia gravis (MG) and to investigate its value in diagnostically challenging subgroups.MethodsThe RoVEMP test was performed in 92 patients with MG, 22 healthy controls, 33 patients with a neuromuscular disease other than MG (neuromuscular controls), 4 patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and 2 patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome.ResultsMean decrement was significantly higher in patients with MG (28.4% ± 32.2) than in healthy controls (3.2% ± 13.9; p < 0.001) or neuromuscular controls (3.8% ± 26.9; p < 0.001). With neuromuscular controls as reference, a cutoff of ≥14.3% resulted in a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 82%. The sensitivity of the RoVEMP test was 80% in ocular MG and 63% in generalized MG. The RoVEMP test was positive in 6 of 7 patients with seronegative MG (SNMG) with isolated ocular weakness. Of 10 patients with SNMG with negative repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) results, 73% had an abnormal RoVEMP test. The magnitude of decrement was correlated with the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine (B = 5.40; p = 0.019).ConclusionsThe RoVEMP test is a new neurophysiologic test that, in contrast to RNS and single-fiber EMG, is able to measure neuromuscular transmission of extraocular muscles, which are the most affected muscles in MG. Especially in diagnostically challenging patients with negative antibody tests, negative RNS results, and isolated ocular muscle weakness, the RoVEMP test has a clear added value in supporting the diagnosis of MG.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that RoVEMP distinguishes MG from other neuromuscular diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.