Predicting which caretakers are at risk for using the ED for nonurgent care when their children are sick provides the primary care physician a means of identifying specific patients who may benefit from interventions designed to promote a more cost-effective approach to using medical resources. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1086-1092
Chronic disease management using the traditional 15-minute appointment is exceptionally challenging and arguably inadequate to provide comprehensive, prospective, patient-centered primary care. A model of care designed to promote patient education, patient self-management, and improved access to their physicians and other health care providers is needed. Group visits have been identified as one model that allows physicians to deliver extensive patient education and self-management instruction while enhancing financial productivity. A thorough review of the literature on group visits was performed. Fairly consistent results from level I and II quality of evidence from a revised Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) rating system indicate that patients who attended group visits demonstrated improved standards of care, improved quality of life, greater patient and physician satisfaction, lower rates of hospitalization and emergency department utilization, and reduced specialty costs. Discrepancies from the literature review include body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, blood pressure, and lipids. Overall, group visits appear to provide an effective and complementary strategy to traditional primary care in dealing with the complexities of providing chronic disease management in an increasing complex and aging population.
PURPOSEW e examined the effectiveness of a multicomponent lifestyle activity intervention for overweight or obese patients with impaired fasting glucose (prediabetes). The physician-directed counseling intervention included collaborative goal setting with patients to achieve specifi c changes in physical activity and nutrition behaviors. Nurse surveillance was used to provide reinforcement and to monitor progress.
METHODSWe randomized 88 adult patients with prediabetes and a body mass index of 25 kg/m 2 or greater to either an immediate-or a delayed-intervention group. Individualare "carved out" to an external staff person substantially improves implementation and allows more effective use of clinicians in a supporting role, such as reinforcing the intervention with patients. One potential limitation of the health educator model is that clinic staff won't accept an outsider. Contrary to this admonition, the current project demonstrated that the health educator becomes incorporated as part of the staff in a very short period of time, and other research indicates that the model works well in a variety of health care settings. 2 Another potential limitation is the sustainability of the model. One solution for sustaining this model in FQHCs is to use students in health-related professional programs (eg, public health, social work, nursing, medicine). These students could be a consistent source of low-cost health educator staff at FQHCs during their practicum or independent study experience, and the program could be replicated in most large cities. This approach, however, will require the development of standardized practicum curricula within different professional schools to train students in the techniques and practice of SBI.To read or post commentaries in response to this article, see it online at http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/3/Suppl_2/S58.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.