Pneumococcal endocarditis is a rare entity, corresponding to 1 to 3% of native valve endocarditis cases. It has a typically adverse prognosis, with high mortality. There is a reported predilection for the aortic valve; thus, a common presentation is acute left heart failure. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with a history of sinusitis, who was admitted with the diagnosis of pneumonia. She rapidly deteriorated with signs of septic shock and was transferred to the critical care unit. The transesophageal echocardiogram revealed severe aortic regurgitation due to valve vegetations. Blood cultures were positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae. She underwent cardiac surgery and had multiple postoperative complications. Nonetheless, the patient made a slow and complete recovery. Infectious endocarditis should be ruled out if any suspicion arises, and echocardiography should be performed in an early stage in patients with poor response to vasopressors and inotropes. Patients with pneumococcal endocarditis benefit from an aggressive approach, with performance of early surgery.
Background Behçet’s syndrome is a multisystemic vasculitis of unknown aetiology. Cardiac involvement is rare, with described prevalence between 1% and 46%, with pericarditis, valvular insufficiency, intracardiac thrombosis, and eventually sinus of Valsalva aneurysms being the most common findings. Although previously reported, myocarditis is a very rare complication of Behçet’s syndrome. Case summary A 26-year-old man, smoker but otherwise healthy, was admitted to the emergency department with atypical chest pain, with no radiation, relation to efforts, position or deep inspiration, and dyspnoea, since the day before. His physical examination was unremarkable, including no fever, tachycardia, or pericardial friction rub. Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed an early repolarization pattern, with no changes noted in subsequent exams. He had elevation of inflammatory parameters and an increased high-sensitivity troponin level of 3300 ng/L. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was unremarkable. Coronary angiography showed no coronary stenosis. A presumed diagnosis of non-complicated viral myocarditis was established. The patient’s condition improved with acetylsalicylic acid as needed and colchicine and he was discharged after 3 days. Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed, showing late epicardial enhancement in the apical segment of the lateral wall, supporting the diagnosis of myocarditis. Four months later, the patient returned with recurrence of chest pain. Additionally, he also complained of fever, odynophagia, and otalgia since the previous week. Oropharyngeal examination revealed tonsillar pillars aphthosis. The ECG was similar to the previous and TTE was normal. Bloodwork revealed once again elevation of inflammatory parameters and elevation of troponin. Recurrent myocarditis was diagnosed. Treatment with ibuprofen, colchicine, and antibiotic therapy was started with no significant improvement. After a more thorough physical examination, an ulcerated scrotal lesion, a left buttock folliculitis, and an axillary hidradenitis were found, which, according to the patient, were recurrent in the last year. Accordingly, the diagnosis of Behçet’s syndrome with mucocutaneous and cardiac involvement was established. The patient was kept on colchicine and was also started on immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and azathioprine, with resolution of the symptoms in the following day. A positron emission tomography (PET) was performed 2 days after discharge and showed a higher myocardial uptake in the left ventricular basal segments and both papillary muscles. Prednisolone tapering was started after 2 months, while maintaining azathioprine. At 1-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic. A re-evaluation PET was performed, showing no images suggestive of metabolically active disease in the myocardium. Discussion This case highlights the importance of awareness of this rare but potentially serious entity and reinforces the significance of aetiology investigation in cases of recurrent myocarditis. It also shows the success of immunosuppressive therapy in a context where the optimal management is still considerably uncertain.
Introduction Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines on the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary prevention of CVD in this population are conflicting. A potential reduction in the severity of a first episode of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) could be seen has an additional argument for the use of ASA in primary prevention. Aim: To evaluate the impact of prior intake of ASA on the presentation, severity and short-term prognosis of AMI in diabetic patients without history of CVD. Methods Retrospective analysis of diabetic patients without previous evidence of CVD diagnosed with type 1 AMI between January 2002 and December 2018, inserted in a multicentric registry of acute coronary syndromes. Patients were dichotomized according to whether or not they were taking ASA prior to the index event. Groups were compared according to clinical, analytical and imaging endpoints. Results A total of 2596 patients were included, predominantly men (66.4%), with a mean age of 68±12 years old. Patients on ASA (19.7%) were significantly older (71±10 vs. 67±12, p<0.001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (89.2% vs 77.9%, p<0.001), dyslipidaemia (69.8% vs. 61.1%, p<0.001) and chronic kidney disease (10.6% vs. 4.9%, p<0.001). Overall, there was a lower prevalence of AMI with ST-segment elevation (36.5% vs. 50.8%, p<0.001) in patients on ASA. However, the same group of patients had a significantly higher probability of evolution in Killip class > I (25.4% vs. 17.0%, p<0.001), a higher median BNP elevation (315 [126–623] vs. 166 [64–431], p<0.001); and a lower average ejection fraction upon discharge (49.0±12 vs. 51±12, p=0.011). Patients on prior regular intake of ASA also had a higher prevalence of multivessel disease (38.4% vs. 28.9%, p<0.001) and multiple significant stenosis (70.2% vs. 61.7%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the percentage of electrical complications (2.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.06), use of intra-aortic balloon pump (1.0 vs. 0.9%, p=0.74) and in-hospital death (3.0% vs. 2.4%, p=0.46). In a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and previous medication as variates, prior ASA intake was an independent predictor of a lower rate of AMI with ST-segment elevation (ExpB −0.34; 95% CI: 0.57–0.89; p=0.003). On the contrary, when adjusted to these variables, prior ASA intake was not an independent predictor of higher BNP (p=0.13) or higher probability of multivessel disease (p=0.22) or presence of ≥1 significant stenosis (p=0.31). Conclusions In this population of diabetic patients with a first episode of ACS, prior use of ASA in the context of primary prevention was associated with a significant lower rate of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Introduction Historically, women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have worse outcomes compared with men. Differences in clinical, demographic characteristics and treatment may explain this result. In recent times with new diagnostic capabilities and revascularization therapies this panorama may be changing. Methods Single-center retrospective study comparing gender differences in ACS patients from 2012 to 2017. Two groups were formed comparing women and men: Group A: years 2012 to 2014 and group B: years 2015 to 2017. Results From 2012 to 2017 we identified 1091 patients with ACS. Of them 356 (32,6%) were women and NSTEMI (60%) was the most frequent type of ACS in this group. Women with ACS were older than men (73 vs 66 years) had more arterial hypertension (83,4% vs 68,3% p<0,001), diabetes mellitus (46,3% vs 30,9% p<0,001) and were less frequently smokers (6,5% vs 25,3% p<0,01). Dyspnea as the predominant symptom was more frequent in women (10,4% vs 5,2% p=0,002) who were less submitted to invasive strategy (63,2% vs 74,7% p<0,001) where non obstructive disease was more prevalent compared to men (9,8% vs 3,3% p<0,001). In-hospital mortality was greater in the women group (7,9% vs 3,7% p=0.005). There were no differences between groups in hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality over 1-year follow-up. When comparing Group A with Group B there were differences in hospitalization at 1 year (Group A 15,4% vs 9,3% p=0,029, Group B 11% vs 12,4% p=0,766), in-hospital women mortality (Group A 9,5% vs 3,6 p=0,005, Group B 5,8 vs 3,8% p=0,346) and coronary invasive angiography (Group A 61,2% vs 80,2% p<0,001 vs Group B 65,8 vs 68,5%, p=0,606). Conclusion Different demographic and clinical presentation as well as in-hospital and 1-year outcomes were present in our study population: while in Group A threre were significant gender differences regarding hospitalization and in-hospital mortality, those differences faded away in Group B. Efforts should be made to lessen gender differences in treatment and assistance knowing the different demographical and clinical patient profile.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.