Background: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), formerly termed adult-acquired flatfoot deformity, is a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity of the foot characterized by peritalar subluxation (PTS). PTS is typically measured at the posterior facet, but recent studies have called this into question. The objective of this study was to use 3D distance mapping (DM) from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) to assess PTS in patients with PCFD and controls. We hypothesized that DMs would identify the middle facet as a superior marker for PTS. Methods: We analyzed WBCT data of 20 consecutive stage I patients with PCFD and 10 control patients with a novel DM technique to objectively characterize joint coverage across the entire peritalar surface, including both articular and nonarticular regions. Joint coverage was defined as the percentage of articular area with DMs <4 mm and impingement when distances were <0.5 mm. Comparisons were performed with independent t tests or Wilcoxon tests. P values <.05 were considered significant. Results: Overall, coverage was decreased in articular regions and impingement was increased in nonarticular regions of patients with PCFD with a significant increase in uncoverage in the middle (46.6%, P < .001) but not anterior or posterior facets. Significant increases in sinus tarsi coverage were identified (98.0%, P < .007) with impingement in 6 of 20 patients with PCFD. Impingement of the subfibular region was noted in only 1 of 20 cases but narrowing greater than 2 standard deviations was noted in 17 of 20 patients. Conclusions: Objective DMs identified significant markers of PTS in the middle but not posterior or anterior facets. We confirmed prior 2-dimensional data that suggested uncoverage of the middle facet provided a more robust and consistent measure of PTS than measures in the posterior facet. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Background: Historical concept of flatfoot as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) has been questioned. Recently, the consensus group published a new classification system and recommended renaming PTTD to Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). The new PCFD classification could be effective in providing comprehensive information on the deformity. To date, there has been no study reporting intra- and interobserver reliability and the frequency of each class in PCFD classification. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted from prospectively collected registry data. A consecutive cohort of PCFD patients evaluated from February 2015 to October 2020 was included, consisting of 92 feet in 84 patients. Classification of each patient was made using characteristic clinical and radiographic findings by 3 independent observers. Frequencies of each class and subclass were assessed. Intraobserver and inteobserver reliabilities were analyzed with Cohen kappa and Fleiss kappa, respectively. Results: Mean sample age was 54.4, 38% was male and 62% were female. 1ABC (25.4%) was the most common subclass, followed by 1AC (8.7%) and 1ABCD (6.9%). Only a small percentage of patients had isolated deformity. Class A was the most frequent component (89.5%), followed by C in 86.2% of the cases. Moderate interobserver reliability (Fleiss kappa = 0.561, P < .001, 95% CI 0.528-0.594) was found for overall classification. Very good intraobserver reliability was found (Cohen kappa = 0.851, P < .001, 95% CI 0.777-0.926). Conclusion: Almost half (49.3%) of patients had a presentation dominantly involving the hindfoot (A) with various combinations of midfoot and/or forefoot deformity (B), (C) with or without subtalar joint involvement (D). The new system may cover all possible combinations of the PCFD, providing a comprehensive description and guiding treatment in a systematic and individualized manner, but this initial study suggests an opportunity to improve overall interobserver reliability. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective diagnostic study.

Background: Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex 3-dimensional pathology characterized by peritalar subluxation (PTS) of the hindfoot. For many years, PTS was measured at the posterior facet of the subtalar joint. More recently, subluxation of the middle facet has been proposed as a more accurate and reliable marker of symptomatic AAFD, enabling earlier detection. The objective of this study was to compare the amount of subluxation between the medial and posterior facets in patients with AAFD. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective comparative study, a total of 76 patients with AAFD (87 feet) who underwent standing weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) as a standard baseline assessment of their foot deformity were analyzed. Two blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons with >10 years of experience measured subtalar joint subluxation (as a percentage of joint uncoverage) at the both posterior and middle facets. One of the readers also measured the foot and ankle offset (FAO). PTS measurements were performed at the sagittal midpoint of the articular facets using coronal plane WBCT images. Intra- and interobserver agreement was measured for PTS measurements using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The intermethod agreement between the posterior and middle facet subluxation was assessed using Spearman’s correlation and bivariate analysis. Paired comparison of the measurements was performed using the Wilcoxon test. A multivariate analysis and a partition prediction model were used to assess influence of PTS measurements on FAO values. P values of <.05 were considered significant. Results: ICCs for intra- and interobserver reliabilities were 0.97 and 0.93, respectively, for posterior and 0.99 and 0.97, respectively, for middle facet subluxation. The intermethod Spearman’s correlation between subluxation of the posterior and middle facets was measured at 0.61. In a bivariate analysis, both measurements were found to be significantly and linearly correlated ( P < .0001; R2 = 0.42). Measurements of middle facet subluxation were found to be significantly higher than those for posterior facet subluxation, with a median difference (using the Hodges-Lehman factor) of 17.7% ( P < .001; 95% CI, 10.9%-23.6%). We also found that for every 1% increase in posterior facet subluxation there was a corresponding 1.6-fold increase in middle facet subluxation. Only middle facet subluxation measurements were found to significantly influence FAO calculations ( P = .003). The partition prediction model demonstrated that a middle facet subluxation value of 43.8% represented an important threshold for increased FAO. Conclusion: This study is the first to compare WBCT measurements of subtalar joint subluxation at the posterior and middle facets as markers of PTS in patients with AAFD. We found a positive linear correlation between the measurements, with subluxation of the middle facet being significantly more pronounced than that of the posterior facet by an average of almost 18%. This suggests that middle facet subluxation may provide an earlier and more pronounced marker of progressive PTS in patients with AAFD. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative cohort study.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the subtalar joint is a serious, disabling, and frequent complication following intra-articular calcaneal fractures (IACFs). Using plain radiographs to assess the subtalar joint for PTOA is imprecise and insensitive, hindering progress toward improving treatment and assessing outcomes. This study explored how low-dose weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) can be used to provide reliable, quantitative 3D measures of subtalar joint space width (JSW) following IACF and correlated the 3D JSW with clinical outcomes. Methods: After institutional review board approval, 21 patients (15 male; age, 28-70 years) who sustained IACFs and were treated with percutaneous surgical reduction underwent WBCT scans at follow-up visits 2 to 15 years (average, 7.8 years) after surgical treatment. Subtalar joint 3D JSW was computed after a semiautomated protocol was used to segment the talus and calcaneus from the WBCT data. Mean and minimum 3D JSW measurements were calculated and compared with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) radiographic osteoarthritis grade, RAND-36 Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to detect the strength of association between variables, with significance set at P < .05. Results: Mean 3D JSW values measured from WBCT for patients with IACFs ranged from 0.9 to 2.5 mm (1.7 ± 0.4 mm) over the entire subtalar joint. Intra- and interrater reliabilities for the WBCT-based JSW measurement technique were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. Mean and minimum 3D JSW values correlated inversely with VAS pain scores and KL grade ( P < .05), particularly in central and posterior subtalar regions. Conclusion: WBCT-based methods were used to quantify the preservation/loss of JSW in patients with IACFs, enabling more accurate, definitive measurement of subtalar PTOA. The results of this study demonstrate that WBCT can be utilized to objectively assess subtalar PTOA and help us to better understand how arthritic changes affect actual patient experience. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic comparative study.

No abstract

Background Older patients (> 30 years) undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to delay THA often have inferior patient-reported outcomes than younger adult patients (< 30 years). It is unclear how patient age affects hip morphology, mechanics, or patient-reported outcome scores. Questions/purposes (1) Is increased patient age associated with computationally derived elevations in joint contact stresses? (2) Does hip shape affect computationally derived joint contact stresses? (3) Do computationally derived joint contact stresses correlate with visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores evaluated at rest in the clinic at a minimum of 1 year after surgery?