Multimetallic complexes with extended and highly conjugated bis-2,2':6',2''-terpyridyl bridging ligands, which present building blocks for coordination polymers, are investigated with respect to their ability to act as light-harvesting antennae. The investigated species combine Ru(II)- with Os(II)- and Fe(II)-terpyridyl chromophores, the latter acting as energy sinks. Due to the extended conjugated system the ligands are able to prolong the lifetime of the (3)MLCT states compared to unsubstituted terpyridyl species by delocalization and energetic stabilization of the (3)MLCT states. This concept is applied for the first time to Fe(II) terpyridyl species and results in an exceptionally long lifetime of 23 ps for the Fe(II) (3)MLCT state. While partial energy (>80%) transfer is observed between the Ru(II) and Fe(II) centers with a time-constant of 15 ps, excitation energy is transferred completely from the Ru(II) to the Os(II) center within the first 200 fs after excitation.

The photochemistry of Ru coordination compounds is generally discussed to originate from the lowest lying triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer state ( MLCT). However, when heteroleptic complexes are considered, for example, in the design of molecular triads for efficient photoinduced charge separation, a complex structure of MLCT states, which can be populated in a rather narrow spectral window (typically around 450 nm) is to be considered. In this contribution we show that the localization of MLCT excited states on different ligands can affect the following ps to ns decay pathways to an extent that by tuning the excitation wavelength, intermolecular energy transfer from a Ru -terpyridine unit to a fullerene acceptor can be favored over electron transfer within the molecular triad. These results might have important implications for the design of molecular dyads, triads, pentads and so forth with respect to a specifically targeted response of these complexes to photoexcitation.

A series of terpyridine (tpy) methanofullerene and pyrrolidinofullerene dyads linked via p-phenylene or p-phenyleneethynylenephenylene (PEP) units is presented. The coordination to ruthenium(II) yields donor-bridge-acceptor assemblies with different lengths. Cyclic voltammetry and UV-vis and luminescence spectroscopy are applied to study the electronic interactions between the active moieties. It is shown that, upon light excitation of the ruthenium(II)-based (1)MLCT transition, the formed (3)MLCT state is readily quenched in the presence of C60. The photoinduced dynamics have been studied by transient absorption spectroscopy, which reveals fast depopulation of the (3)MLCT (73-406 ps). As a consequence, energy transfer occurs, populating a long-lived triplet state, which could be assigned to the (3)C60* state.

Abstract:We report the modular synthesis of donor-photosensitizer-bridge-acceptor (D-P-B-A) triads and D-P dyads for the formation of photoinduced charge-separated species. The structures are based on a phenothiazine unit (D), a bis(terpyridine) [bis(tpy)] ruthenium(II) complex (P), several phenylene(ethynylene)-type spacer units (B), and a pyrrolidino[60]fullerene entity (A). The donor-acceptor distance is between 18 and 37 Å and was varied by four different bridging units. The photophysical and electrochemical characterization revealed

Distance-dependent electron transfer in donor–spacer–acceptor systems is accepted to occur via two distinct mechanisms, that is, by coherent superexchange or incoherent hopping. In general, the rate of electron transfer (k ET) decreases with increasing donor–acceptor distances, irrespective of the actual mechanism being responsible for the process. However, recently Wenger and his group showed that in the frame of the superexchange mechanism electron-transfer rates can pass a maximum when increasing the transfer distance. This manuscript presents an investigation of the forward electron transfer in a series of donor (N-methylphenothiazine)–photocenter (Ru­(II) bis­(terpyridine) complex)–acceptor (N-methylfulleropyrrolidine) triads that reveals the control of the electron-transfer rates by solvent variation to an extent that in acetonitrile an increasing electron-transfer rate is observed with increasing donor–acceptor distance, while in dichloromethane an increase in the separation causes the electron transfer rate to drop. This behavior is qualitatively rationalized based on a recently introduced model. Nonetheless, the quantitative mismatch between the results presented here and the theory indicates that nonexponential distance-dependent couplings will have to be considered in extending the theory.