W. 1994. Peroxidase and chitinase isoenzyme activities during root infection of Chinese cabbage with Plasmodiophora brassicae. -Physioi. Plant. 90: 661-670.Roots of two Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensts) varieties, one tolerant and one susceptible, were inoculated with Plasmodiophora brassicae in liquid medium and in soil. Chitina.se and peroxidase activities were determined in roots and shoots 1-21 days after inoculation with resting .spores of Plasmodiophora and the enzyme activities compared with healthy tissue of the same age. In infected roots of the susceptible variety 'Granat" chitinase activity was higher than in the control 10 days after inoculation w ith spores. In the tolerant variety "Parkin' we detected an increase in chitinase activity at the same time, which was about twice that of 'Granat'. Chitinase activity in 'Granat' was also enhanced on day 13, 14 and 17 after inoculation, whereas chitinase activity in 'Parkin' was lower in the infected roots than in the controls during that period. In the shoots no correlation between chitinase activity and infection in the two varieties was observ'ed. Chitinase from Chinese cabbage was further characterized and showed a pH optimum at pH 4.5-5.5 and a temperature optimum at 35^5°C. After isoelectric focusing 7 isoenzymes were discovered, but there were almost no differences between infected and healthy root extracts. Two isoenzymes with pi 8.7 and 8.8 showed cross-reactivity w ith an antiserum against bean chitinases. The molecular mass of these isoenzymes was determined as 33 kDa. Total peroxidase activity was generally higher in root tissue of both varieties than in the shoots. Peroxidase activity was increased most prominently in infected "Granat' roots on day 13 after inoculation and of hoth varieties on day 17 compared to the controls, ln clubbed tis.sue of 'Granat' a specific peroxidase isoenzyme appeared the first time 21 days after inoculation and was most prominent 28-30 days after inoculation. This isoenzyme had a molecular mass of ca 24 kDa and a pi of ca 8.8. With respect to our results the strategy of the Plasmodiophorales for plant attack is discussed.
Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), face coverings are recommended to diminish person-to-person transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some public debates concern claims regarding risks caused by wearing face masks, like, e.g., decreased blood oxygen levels and impaired cognitive capabilities. The present, pre-registered study aims to contribute clarity by delivering a direct comparison of wearing an N95 respirator and wearing no face covering. We focused on a demanding situation to show that cognitive efficacy and individual states are equivalent in both conditions. We conducted a randomized-controlled crossover trial with 44 participants. Participants performed the task while wearing an N95 FFR versus wearing none. We measured physiological (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate variability), behavioral (parameters of performance in the task), and subjective (perceived mental load) data to substantiate our assumption as broadly as possible. We analyzed data regarding both statistical equivalence and differences. All of the investigated dimensions showed statistical equivalence given our pre-registered equivalence boundaries. None of the dimensions showed a significant difference between wearing an FFR and not wearing an FFR.Trial Registration: Preregistered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/c2xp5 (15/11/2020). Retrospectively registered with German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024806 (18/03/2021).
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of face masks is recommended to prevent droplets from traveling from one person to another. A commandment to wear masks applies in most public places to contain the widespread of the virus. Some public debates concern myths regarding risks caused by wearing a mask, like, e.g., decreased blood oxygen levels and impaired cognitive capabilities. The present, pre-registered study aims to contribute clarity by delivering a direct comparison of wearing an FFP2 (N95) respirator and wearing no mask. We focused on a demanding situation to show that cognitive efficacy and the person's state is equivalent in both conditions of a randomized-controlled cross-over study design. We measured physiological (blood oxygen saturation and heart rate variability), behavioral (parameters of performance in the task), and subjective (perceived mental load) data to substantiate our assumption as broad as possible. We analyzed data from 44 participants regarding both statistical equivalence and differences. All of the investigated dimensions showed statistical equivalence given our pre-registered equivalence boundaries. None of the dimensions showed a significant difference between wearing a mask and not wearing a mask.
As working and learning environments become open and flexible, people are also potentially surrounded by ambient noise, which causes an increase in mental workload. The present study uses electroencephalogram (EEG) and subjective measures to investigate if noise-canceling technologies can fade out external distractions and free up mental resources. Therefore, participants had to solve spoken arithmetic tasks that were read out via headphones in three sound environments: a quiet environment (no noise), a noisy environment (noise), and a noisy environment but with active noise-canceling headphones (noise-canceling). Our results of brain activity partially confirm an assumed lower mental load in no noise and noise-canceling compared to noise test condition. The mean P300 activation at Cz resulted in a significant differentiation between the no noise and the other two test conditions. Subjective data indicate an improved situation for the participants when using the noise-canceling technology compared to “normal” headphones but shows no significant discrimination. The present results provide a foundation for further investigations into the relationship between noise-canceling technology and mental workload. Additionally, we give recommendations for an adaptation of the test design for future studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.