An outbreak of 18 pneumonia cases caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 occurred at a Swedish university hospital 1996 to 1999. Eight clinical isolates obtained by culture from the respiratory tract were compared to 20 environmental isolates from the hospital and to 21 epidemiologically unrelated isolates in Sweden, mostly from patients, by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP), and monoclonal antibody (MAb) typing. All patients and most environmental isolates from the outbreak hospital belonged to the same genotypic cluster in both PFGE and AFLP. This genotype was distinctly different from other strains, including a cluster from a second hospital in a different part of the country. The MAb subtype of the outbreak clone was Knoxville except for three isolates that were Oxford. A variation in the MAb reactivity pattern was also found in a second genotypic cluster. These changes in the MAb reactivity pattern were due to the absence or presence of the lag-1 gene coding for an Oacetyltransferase that is responsible for expression of the lipopolysaccharide epitope recognized by MAb 3/1 of the Dresden Panel. In all MAb 3/1-positive strains, the lag-1 gene was present on a genetic element that was bordered by a direct repeat that showed a high degree of sequence homology. Due to this homology, the lag-1 gene region seemed to be an unstable element in the chromosome. MAb patterns are thus a valuable adjunct to genotyping methods in defining subgroups inside a genotypic cluster of L. pneumophila sg 1.

No abstract

The genotypic distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 was investigated in the water distribution system of a 450-bed Swedish hospital and the surrounding community. A single genotype identified by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, was found in all 34 hospital isolates and in 18 out of 20 community isolates over a 12-y surveillance period. All isolates were either monoclonal antibody subtypes Benidorm or Bellingham. In a geographical comparison, the hospital genotype was also identified in 2 out of 6 Swedish hospitals, both located within 100 km of the studied community. In all, 70 isolates originating from 7 Swedish communities clustered in 4 groups, each also containing 1 AFLP type as defined by the European Working Group on Legionella Infections (EWGLI). It was concluded that a single Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 genotype may colonize a large water distribution system over a long period of time, and that certain clones seem to be widely spread in the environment. Results from molecular typing of isolates originating from a limited geographical area must, therefore, be interpreted cautiously in epidemiological investigations of Legionnaires' disease.

An outbreak of eight cases of pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila non-serogroup 1 (non-sg 1) occurred at a Swedish university hospital in 1993. Including previous and subsequent sporadic cases, the total number of culture-positive patients was 13. Twelve available non-sg1 isolates from patients were compared to 50 environmental water isolates using a monoclonal antibody test for serogrouping and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP). Of the 12 hospital-associated Legionella non-sg 1 patient isolates, 4 were serogrouped as sg 4, 7 as sg 10, and one as sg 6. Using AFLP fingerprinting all serogroup (sg) 4 and 10 isolates were genetically related except for minor variations. Furthermore, sg 4 isolates were identical in AFLP to sg 10 isolates. Patient isolates were also identical to isolates found in the water system of several hospital buildings, but quite unrelated to isolates obtained in a subsequent outbreak at the same hospital caused by L. pneumophila sg 1. Serogroup variations in outbreaks may occur despite a common molecular fingerprinting pattern. Evidently, the L. pneumophila sg 4 and 10 strains were closely related genetically, which raises the question whether this variation in phenotype is due to a genetic event or to a variable phenotypic expression. Genetic fingerprinting should be used in conjunction with serogrouping in epidemiological investigations.

No abstract