HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

No abstract

For decades, the monogenetic bleeding disorders hemophilia A and B (coagulation factor VIII and IX deficiency) have been treated with systemic protein replacement therapy. Now, diverse molecular medicines, ranging from antibody to gene to RNA therapy, are transforming treatment. Traditional replacement therapy requires twice to thrice weekly intravenous infusions of factor. While extended half-life products may reduce the frequency of injections, patients continue to face lifelong burden of the therapy, suboptimal protection from bleeding and joint damage, and potential development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (inhibitors) that require less efficacious bypassing agents and further reduce quality of life. Novel non-replacement and gene therapies aim to address these remaining issues. A recently approved factor VIII-mimetic antibody accomplishes hemostatic correction in patients both with and without inhibitors. Antibodies against Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) and antithrombin-specific siRNA target natural anticoagulant pathways to rebalance hemostasis. Adeno-associated viral (AAV) gene therapy provides lasting clotting factor replacement and can also be used to induce immune tolerance. Multiple gene editing techniques are under clinical or preclinical investigation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of these approaches, explain how they differ from standard therapies, and predict how the hemophilia treatment landscape will be reshaped.

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis has not been evaluated in randomized trials. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants in the predefined subgroup of children with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) who participated in the EINSTEIN-Jr trial. Children with CVT were randomized (2:1), after initial heparinization, to treatment with rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulants (continued on heparin or switched to vitamin K antagonist). The main treatment period was 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and principal safety outcome, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding,were centrally evaluated by blinded investigators. Sinus recanalization on repeat brain imaging was a secondary outcome. Statistical analyses were exploratory. In total, 114 children with confirmed CVT were randomized. All children completed the follow-up. None of the 73 rivaroxaban recipients and 1 (2.4%; CVT) of the 41 standard anticoagulant recipients had symptomatic, recurrent VTE after 3 months (absolute difference, 2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.6% to 13.5%). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 5 (6.8%; all nonmajor and noncerebral) rivaroxaban recipients and in 1 (2.5%; major [subdural] bleeding) standard anticoagulant recipient (absolute difference, 4.4%; 95% CI, −6.7% to 13.4%). Complete or partial sinus recanalization occurred in 18 (25%) and 39 (53%) rivaroxaban recipients and in 6 (15%) and 24 (59%) standard anticoagulant recipients, respectively. In summary, in this substudy of a randomized trial with a limited sample size, children with CVT treated with rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulation had a low risk of recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with isolated thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk. While many children with ITP can be safely observed, treatments are often needed for various reasons, including to decrease

Objectives: Thrombosis is a cause of morbidity in 4–15% of children who undergo pediatric cardiac surgery. Data on how to prevent this complication are sorely needed. We aimed to identify risk factors for thrombosis following pediatric cardiac surgery and determine if use of low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis is associated with a reduction in thrombosis risk. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary pediatric cardiovascular ICU. Patients: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery between June 2014 and December 2015. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Data from patients with venous or arterial thrombosis confirmed by radiologic studies were matched two-to-one to controls based on age, Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery mortality category, and gender. Thrombosis was detected in 33 patients (6.2%): 25 patients (76%) had venous thromboses, five patients (15%) had arterial thromboses, and three patients (9%) had both. Median time to thrombosis detection was 13 days (25–75%; 7–31 d). On multivariate analysis, which included adjustment for postoperative disease severity, fresh frozen plasma exposure was independently associated with thrombosis (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4–9.4). Twenty-eight patients (85%) had central venous catheter-related thromboses. Low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis use in this subset of patients was not statistically different from controls (50% vs 45%, respectively; p = 0.47). On multivariable analysis, fresh frozen plasma exposure was also independently associated with central venous catheter-related thrombosis (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2–10.6). Conclusions: The occurrence of thrombosis after pediatric cardiac surgery at our institution was 6.2%, similar to what has been reported in other studies, despite frequent use of low molecular weight heparin. Further study is needed to determine the role of low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis and the relationship between fresh frozen plasma and thrombosis risk in children who undergo cardiac surgery.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder which presents with isolated thrombocytopenia and risk of hemorrhage. While most children with ITP promptly recover with or without drug therapy, ITP is persistent or chronic in others. When needed, how to select second-line therapies is not clear. ICON1, conducted within the Pediatric ITP Consortium of North America (ICON), is a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of 120 children from 21 centers starting second-line treatments for ITP which examined treatment decisions. Treating physicians reported reasons for selecting therapies, ranking the top three. In a propensity weighted model, the most important factors were patient/parental preference (53%) and treatment-related factors: side effect profile (58%), long-term toxicity (54%), ease of administration (46%), possibility of remission (45%), and perceived efficacy (30%). Physician, health system, and clinical factors rarely influenced decision-making. Patient/parent preferences were selected as reasons more often in chronic ITP (85.7%) than in newly diagnosed (0%) or persistent ITP (14.3%, P = .003). Splenectomy and rituximab were chosen for the possibility of inducing long-term remission (P < .001). Oral agents, such as eltrombopag and immunosuppressants, were chosen for ease of administration and expected adherence (P < .001). Physicians chose rituximab in patients with lower expected adherence (P = .017). Treatment choice showed some physician and treatment center bias. This study illustrates the complexity and many factors involved in decision-making in selecting second-line ITP treatments, given the absence of comparative trials. It highlights shared decision-making and the need for well-conducted, comparative effectiveness studies to allow for informed discussion between patients and clinicians.

Background Recently, the randomized EINSTEIN-Jr. study showed similar efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulation for treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The rivaroxaban dosing strategy was established based on phase 1 and 2 data in children and through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.Methods Rivaroxaban treatment with tablets or the newly-developed granules-fororal suspension formulation was bodyweight-adjusted and administered once-daily, twice-daily or thrice-daily for children with bodyweights of ≥30, ≥12-<30, and <12kg, respectively. Previously, these regimens were confirmed for children weighing ≥20kg but only predicted in those <20kg. Based on sparse blood sampling, the daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC (0-24)ss ] and trough [C trough,ss ] and