During development, cell proliferation and differentiation must be tightly coordinated to ensure proper tissue morphogenesis. Because steroid hormones are central regulators of developmental timing, understanding the links between steroid hormone signaling and cell proliferation is crucial to understanding the molecular basis of morphogenesis. Here we examined the mechanism by which the steroid hormone ecdysone regulates the cell cycle in Drosophila. We find that a cell cycle arrest induced by ecdysone in Drosophila cell culture is analogous to a G2 cell cycle arrest observed in the early pupa wing. We show that in the wing, ecdysone signaling at the larva-to-puparium transition induces Broad which in turn represses the cdc25c phosphatase String. The repression of String generates a temporary G2 arrest that synchronizes the cell cycle in the wing epithelium during early pupa wing elongation and flattening. As ecdysone levels decline after the larva-to-puparium pulse during early metamorphosis, Broad expression plummets, allowing String to become re-activated, which promotes rapid G2/M progression and a subsequent synchronized final cell cycle in the wing. In this manner, pulses of ecdysone can both synchronize the final cell cycle and promote the coordinated acquisition of terminal differentiation characteristics in the wing.

Dosage compensation (DC) equalizes X-linked gene expression between sexes. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the dosage compensation complex (DCC) localizes to both X chromosomes in hermaphrodites and downregulates gene expression two-fold. The DCC first localizes to hermaphrodite X chromosomes at the 30-cell stage, coincident with a developmental transition from plasticity to differentiation. To test whether DC onset is linked to loss of developmental plasticity, we established a timeline for the accumulation of DC-mediated chromatin features on X (depletion of histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16ac) and enrichment of H4K20 monomethylation (H4K20me1)) in both wild type and developmentally delayed embryos. Surprisingly, we found that H4K16ac is depleted from the X even before the 30-cell stage in a DCC-independent manner. This depletion requires the activities of MES-2, MES-3, and MES-6 (a complex similar to the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2), and MES-4. By contrast, H4K20me1 becomes enriched on X chromosomes several cell cycles after DCC localization to the X, suggesting that it is a late mark in DC. MES-2 also promotes differentiation, and mes-2 mutant embryos exhibit prolonged developmental plasticity. Consistent with the hypothesis that the onset of DC is linked to differentiation, DCC localization and H4K20me1 accumulation on the X chromosomes are delayed in mes mutant hermaphrodite embryos. Furthermore, the onset of hermaphrodite-specific transcription of sdc-2 (which triggers DC) is delayed in mes-2 mutants. We propose that as embryonic blastomeres lose their developmental plasticity, hermaphrodite X chromosomes transition from a MES protein-regulated state to DCC-mediated repression.

Robust and synchronous repression of E2F-dependent gene expression is critical to the proper timing of cell cycle exit when cells transition to a postmitotic state. Previously NuA4 was suggested to act as a barrier to proliferation in Drosophila by repressing E2F-dependent gene expression. Here we show that NuA4 activity is required for proper cell cycle exit and the repression of cell cycle genes during the transition to a postmitotic state in vivo. However, the delay of cell cycle exit caused by compromising NuA4 is not due to additional proliferation or effects on E2F activity. Instead NuA4 inhibition results in slowed cell cycle progression through late S and G2 phases due to aberrant activation of an intrinsic p53-independent DNA damage response. A reduction in NuA4 function ultimately produces a paradoxical cell cycle gene expression program, where certain cell cycle genes become derepressed in cells that are delayed during the G2 phase of the final cell cycle. Bypassing the G2 delay when NuA4 is inhibited leads to abnormal mitoses and results in severe tissue defects. NuA4 physically and genetically interacts with components of the E2F complex termed Drosophila, Rbf, E2F and Myb/Multi-vulva class B (DREAM/MMB), and modulates a DREAM/MMB-dependent ectopic neuron phenotype in the posterior wing margin. However, this effect is also likely due to the cell cycle delay, as simply reducing Cdk1 is sufficient to generate a similar phenotype. Our work reveals that the major requirement for NuA4 in the cell cycle in vivo is to suppress an endogenous DNA damage response, which is required to coordinate proper S and G2 cell cycle progression with differentiation and cell cycle gene expression.KEYWORDS DNA damage; proliferation; H2Av; cell cycle checkpoint; cell cycle exit A conserved eukaryotic transcriptional oscillator controls cell cycle gene expression in proliferating cells and underlies the well-studied Cyclin/Cdk cell cycle protein oscillator (Orlando et al. 2008;Oikonomou and Cross 2010). In metazoans, this oscillator depends upon transcriptional activation of several hundred cell cycle genes, initiated by E2F transcription factor complexes followed by E2F inhibition (or degradation) (Shibutani et al. 2008;Zielke et al. 2011;Sadasivam and Decaprio 2013). This generates an oscillation of chromatin opening and closing at cell cycle genes that is thought to properly coordinate G1/S and G2/M gene expression as well as the transition to a noncycling state (Litovchick et al. 2007(Litovchick et al. , 2011Forristal et al. 2014). Disruption of this coordination can affect cell cycle progression by causing inappropriate gene expression (Reis and Edgar 2004;Wen et al. 2008;Forristal et al. 2014). While the oscillation of E2F activity is required for robust cell cycle gene expression Korenjak et al. 2012), E2F complexes are not absolutely essential for cell cycle progression or timely cell cycle exit in Drosophila (Frolov et al. 2001(Frolov et al. , 2005. In the absence of E2F activity there must be E2F-independ...

Copines are calcium-dependent membrane-binding proteins found in many eukaryotic organisms. We are studying the function of copines using the model organism, Dictyostelium discoideum. When under starvation conditions, Dictyostelium cells aggregate into mounds that become migrating slugs, which can move toward light and heat before culminating into a fruiting body. Previously, we showed that Dictyostelium cells lacking the copine A (cpnA) gene are not able to form fruiting bodies and instead arrest at the slug stage. In this study, we compared the slug behavior of cells lacking the cpnA gene to the slug behavior of wild-type cells. The slugs formed by cpnA- cells were much larger than wild-type slugs and exhibited no phototaxis and negative thermotaxis in the same conditions that wild-type slugs exhibited positive phototaxis and thermotaxis. Mixing as little as 5% wild-type cells with cpnA- cells rescued the phototaxis and thermotaxis defects, suggesting that CpnA plays a specific role in the regulation of the production and/or release of a signaling molecule. Reducing extracellular levels of ammonia also partially rescued the phototaxis and thermotaxis defects of cpnA- slugs, suggesting that CpnA may have a specific role in regulating ammonia signaling. Expressing the lacZ gene under the cpnA promoter in wild-type cells indicated cpnA is preferentially expressed in the prestalk cells found in the anterior part of the slug, which include the cells at the tip of the slug that regulate phototaxis, thermotaxis, and the initiation of culmination into fruiting bodies. Our results suggest that CpnA plays a role in the regulation of the signaling pathways, including ammonia signaling, necessary for sensing and/or orienting toward light and heat in the prestalk cells of the Dictyostelium slug.

A protocol for cell cycle analysis of live Drosophila tissues using the Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer is described. This protocol simultaneously provides information about relative cell size, cell number, DNA content and cell type via lineage tracing or tissue specific expression of fluorescent proteins in vivo. Flow cytometry has been widely used to obtain information about DNA content in a population of cells, to infer relative percentages in different cell cycle phases. This technique has been successfully extended to the mitotic tissues of the model organism Drosophila melanogaster for genetic studies of cell cycle regulation in vivo. When coupled with cell-type specific fluorescent protein expression and genetic manipulations, one can obtain detailed information about effects on cell number, cell size and cell cycle phasing in vivo. However this live-cell method has relied on the use of the cell permeable Hoechst 33342 DNA-intercalating dye, limiting users to flow cytometers equipped with a UV laser. We have modified this protocol to use a newer live-cell DNA dye, Vybrant DyeCycle Violet, compatible with the more common violet 405nm laser. The protocol presented here allows for efficient cell cycle analysis coupled with cell type, relative cell size and cell number information, in a variety of Drosophila tissues. This protocol extends the useful cell cycle analysis technique for live Drosophila tissues to a small benchtop analyzer, the Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer, which can be run and maintained on a single-lab scale.