No abstract

No abstract

The coadministration of Ritonavir and Fluticasone at the recommended doses caused, in our three patients, iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome with adrenal suppression. We suggest that this adverse event is underdiagnosed and high clinical suspicion is needed for early diagnosis and prenention of Addisonian crises. Thus, Fluticasone treatment should be avoided in patients who are treated with Ritonavir. Alternative therapeutic options for asthma control such as oral Montelukast or bronchodilators alone should be considered.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in acutely ill patients hospitalized in medical departments. Thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulants was shown to be safe and effective in medical patients with high risk to develop VTE. Despite guidelines recommendations, the rate of thromboprophylaxis in those patients is low. The objective of the study was to evaluate the rate of VTE risk assessment in routine medical department practice, the rate of eligible patients for thromboprophylaxis, the rate of patients who received thromboprophylaxis, and their outcome. Medical records of consecutive patients (3000 at 2013, 1000 at 2018) hospitalized in medical department were reviewed, retrospectively, for demographic, clinical characteristics, thromboprophylaxis treatment with enoxaparin and outcome (up to 90 days following discharge). Padua score was used for VTE risk assessment. VTE diagnosis was based on clinical suspicion. The mean patient's age (52.6% females) was 67.95 ± 21.56 years. 21% were eligible for thromboprophylaxis. Routine VTE risk assessment rate increased significantly following its incorporation into quality parameters, but the rate of treated patients was low (22% at 2013; 46% at 2018). The patients who received thromophylaxis were sicker compared to eligible patients without thromboprophylaxis. The rate of symptomatic VTE was low (0.24%; 0.12% and 0.55% for low and high VTE risk, respectively). Thromboprophylaxis did not have significant effect on the low number of VTE events. No major bleeding was observed. Major efforts are still needed to increase the rate of thromboprophylaxis in all eligible medical patients according to the guidelines recommendations.

Aim Urinary tract infection is a common cause of paediatric morbidity. However, there is no consensus on the default method for urine culture collection in children. This study aimed to examine the contamination rates of different urine collection methods. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a paediatric emergency department. Data were collected from electronic health records on all children whose urine culture samples were obtained in the paediatric emergency department between March 2018 and March 2019. Different methods of urine collection included the midstream (MS) method, clean catch (CC), transurethral bladder catheterisation and suprapubic aspiration. Contamination rates and positive urine culture rates were calculated and compared for sex, age, and collection method. Results Urine culture samples were collected from 1507 children. There were 284 (18.8%) cultures that were positive with significant growth and 52 (3.5%) that were defined as ‘contaminated’. The contamination rates for the midstream method in toilet‐trained children were 1.6% (10/609), 4.9% (17/348) for CC in pre‐continent children, 4.9% (25/515) for transurethral bladder catheterisation and 0% (0/35) (P = 0.006) for suprapubic aspiration. There was no significant difference in contamination rates of urine cultures collected by CC and catheterisation in the compared groups. The rates of positive cultures in the subgroup of children with high suspicion for Urinary tract infection were also found to be similar. Conclusions Our study shows that CC is non‐inferior to catheterisation for collecting urine cultures in young children.