Weight loss and anorexia are frequent findings in advanced cancer. The progressive wasting could be attributed to changes in dietary intake and/or energy expenditure mediated by metabolic alterations. In this study, we analyzed dietary intake in generalized malignant disease of solid tumor type in relation to resting energy expenditure (REE) and reported weight loss. In a group of 297 unselected cancer patients from a university hospital outpatient clinic, dietary intake of energy and macronutrients from a 4-day food record, REE by indirect calorimetry, height, weight and weight loss were recorded. Protein intake was validated against 24 hr urine nitrogen in a subgroup (n ؍ 53), and no indication of systematic misreporting was found. Mean daily dietary intake was below maintenance requirements, 26 ؎ 10 kcal/kg. Weight loss of more than 10% was present in 43% of patients and elevated REE (>110% of predicted) in 48%. Dietary intake did not differ between normo-and hypermetabolic patients, nor was tumour type or gender related to energy and protein intake. Weight loss could not be accounted for by diminished dietary intake since energy intake in absolute amounts was not different and intake per kilogram body weight was higher in weight-losing patients compared to weight-stable patients. Dietary macronutrient composition did not differ from the general population. Dietary intake of energy and protein was decreased, but dietary macronutrient composition did not appear to be changed. Weight loss and hypermetabolism were frequent and not compensated for by an increase in spontaneous food intake. Our results indicate that an expected up-regulation of dietary intake in response to elevated energy expenditure is frequently lost in cancer patients. This may be the explanation behind cancer cachexia rather than a primary decrease in appetite.
BACKGROUND The role of nutrition in the palliative treatment of patients with malignancy‐related cachexia is unclear. The goal of the current study was to determine whether specialized, nutrition‐focused patient care could improve integrated whole‐body metabolism and functional outcome in unselected weight‐losing patients with malignant disease who were receiving systemic antiinflammatory (cyclooxygenase [COX]‐inhibitory) treatment along with erythropoietin (EPO) support. METHODS Three hundred nine patients with malignant disease who experienced progressive cachexia due to solid tumors (primarily gastrointestinal lesions) were randomized to receive a COX inhibitor (indomethacin, 50 mg twice daily) and EPO (15–40,000 units per week) along with specialized, nutrition‐focused patient care (oral nutritional support and home total parenteral nutrition [TPN]) provided on a patient‐by‐patient basis to attenuate inflammation, prevent anemia, and improve nutritional status. Control patients received the same indomethacin and EPO doses that study patients received without the added nutritional support. All patients were treated and followed until death. Biochemical assays (blood, liver, kidney, and thyroid), nutritional state assessment (food intake and body composition), and exercise testing with simultaneous measurement of whole‐body respiratory gas exchange before and during exercise were performed before the start of treatment and then at regular intervals during the treatment period (every 2–30 months after treatment initiation). Statistical analyses were performed on ‘intention‐to‐treat’ and ‘as‐treated’ bases. RESULTS Home TPN was provided to approximately 50% of the study patients without severe complications. Over the entire observation period, rhEPO prevented the development of anemia in both study patients and control patients. Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed an improvement in energy balance for nutritionally supported patients (P < 0.03); no other significant differences in outcome between study patients and control patients were observed. As‐treated analysis demonstrated that patients receiving nutrition experienced prolonged survival (P < 0.01), which was accompanied by improved energy balance (P < 0.001), increasing body fat (P < 0.05), and a greater maximum exercise capacity (P < 0.04). A trend toward increased metabolic efficiency at maximum exercise (P < 0.06) for study patients relative to control patients also was observed. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study strongly support that nutrition is a limiting factor influencing survival and that nutritional support protects integrated metabolism and metabolic function in patients with progressive cachexia secondary to malignant disease. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
C57BL/6 mice bearing either a transplantable methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma or Lewis lung adenocarcinoma were passively immunized every other day with a rabbit immunoglobulin fraction raised against murine cachectin/tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Mice bearing methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma developed tumor-associated hypophagia that was attenuated by anticachectin immunoglobulin treatment. In the same tumor-bearing animals, anticachectin treatment also significantly reduced the extent of carcass protein and fat loss, and reduced tumor weight. Mice bearing Lewis lung adenocarcinoma did not develop significant anorexia or carcass lean tissue depletion as tumor growth progressed, but they lost carcass lipid. Treatment of Lewis lung adenocarcinoma bearing mice with anticachectin antibodies diminished the degree of carcass lipid depletion and prevented plasma hypertriglyceridemia. However, in both tumor models, anticachectin treatment did not affect either the development of anemia, hypoalbuminemia or the increase in serum amyloid P concentrations seen with increasing tumor burden. We conclude that an endogenous cachectin response, inhibitable by exogenously administered antibody, contributes to anorexia and to changes in body fat and protein metabolism in these tumor-bearing animals. Neutralizing endogenous cachectin production with antibodies offers the potential to reduce tissue wasting that is frequently associated with neoplastic disease, but it does not appear to affect all of the hematologic and acute phase responses in these murine tumor models.
Abstract. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and potential benefits of enteral nutritional support [oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral tube feeding (ETF)], and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, free acid, ethyl esters or fish oil; provided as capsules or enriched ONS or ETF) in patients with cancer. Clinical studies were identified using electronic databases, and studies were selected according to predetermined criteria. For each treatment modality (chemo/radiotherapy, surgery, and palliative care), the comparisons of interest were nutritional support vs. routine care (no nutritional support), EPA supplement (capsule or enriched ONS or ETF) vs. routine care (no supplement or standard supplement), ETF vs. parenteral nutrition (PN). The reviewed outcomes were dietary intake, anthropometry, clinical (mortality, length of hospital stay, complications, and quality of life) and haematological/biochemical (white blood cell count, serum transferrin and albumin, CD3-positive lymphocytes, and inflammatory markers). Meta-analyses were performed where possible. In patients undergoing radiotherapy, meta-analysis showed that ONS significantly increase dietary intake (381 kcal/day, 95% CI 193 to 569 in 3 RCTs) compared to routine care. In patients undergoing surgery, meta-analyses showed that ETF results in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (1.72 fewer days, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.54 in 8 RCTs), lower incidence of any complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77 in 4 RCTs) and infectious complications (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82 in 11 RCTs) and lower sepsis scores (2.21 points, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.92 in 2 RCTs), but no difference in mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.29 in 7 RCTs) compared to PN. There was also no difference in mortality between ONS or ETF vs. routine care in patients undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.62-1.61 in 4 RCTs) or surgery (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.75 to 7.95 in 4 RCTs). Individual studies of EPA supplementation as capsules showed improvements in survival, complications and inflammatory markers in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT). In palliative care patients receiving EPA-enriched ONS or capsules, there were inconsistent positive effects on survival and quality of life. In those undergoing surgery, EPA-enriched ETF had no effect. Further research is required to elucidate the clinical efficacy of enteral nutrition support, including the potential benefits of EPA supplementation, in patients with cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.