Currently used measures of knee stability and function for ACL reconstructed knees have not gained universal acceptance. Clinical test results often are given more value than the patient's subjective evaluation of the surgical outcome. This study was designed to identify specific knee stability and function variables that were most predictive of the patient's rating of knee function following one of two types of combined (intraarticular and extraarticular) ACL reconstruction procedures. Individual measures of knee stability and function were also evaluated for differences between contralateral operated and nonoperated limbs. Postoperative and healthy contralateral knees of 51 male and female patients aged 18 to 49 years (mean, 23.7 years) were evaluated on a battery of tests at an average of 48.0 months after surgery (range, 24 to 101 months). All subjects possessed a normal contralateral knee for comparative purposes. The results of this retrospective study indicated that the variables selected were not highly correlated with, nor could they effectively predict, the patients' perceptions of postoperative knee status as measured by the Knee Function Rating Form (KFR). Statistically significant differences (P less than 0.001) between operated and nonoperated knees were found for 9 of 11 variables analyzed. The data suggest that patients' perceptions of postoperative knee status were independent of the results of static and dynamic clinical tests commonly used to assess knee stability and function. Postoperative deficits of up to 30% between the surgically reconstructed and normal contralateral knees on specific measures of knee stability and function did not greatly influence the patients' perceptions of knee function. Development of new, more specific dynamic tests may be necessary before stronger relationships between clinical test results and patients' perceptions of knee status in the ACL reconstructed knee can be realized.
In a clinical and radiographic survey of the elbows of 120 pitchers ages 11 and 12, 20% were found to have symptoms, 10% flexion contractures, and 23% roentgenographic changes related to traction stresses on the medial side of the elbow. Five per cent had more serious lateral compression findings related to the radial head or capitellum, but none of these had symptoms. Although this represents a definite incidence of abnormal occurrence, there were no statistically significant correlations or interrelations found relating to pitching experience, valgus elbow deformities, symptoms, flexion contractures, or x-ray findings.
Seven cases of osteochondrosis of the capitellum occurring in five high performance female gymnasts between the ages of 11 and 13 are presented. Two of the patients were treated by surgical excision of the loose osteochondral fragment in three elbows. Four of the five gymnasts, including the two who underwent surgical treatment, were able to return to full workouts without recurrence of symptoms within the 3 year followup. All conditions in gymnasts were detected after symptoms had presented. A survey of 37 actively competing gymnasts at a nationally known gymnastics academy was performed, including a detailed history and physical examination and radiographic examination. No other cases of osteochondrosis were detected. It was postulated that this condition represents a lateral compression injury because of repetitive valgus overload. Investigation of the capitellar blood supply indicates that the common factors in osteochondrosis of the capitellum are repetitive or prolonged trauma to a vulnerable epiphysis on a basis of vascular interruption. Gymnastics maneuvers require forceful weight-bearing through the upper extremities. Medical personnel and coaches associated with gymnastics need to be aware of the condition of osteochondrosis of the capitellum so that any gymnast who presents with a painful, tender, swollen or locked elbow is appropriately investigated and treated.
A long-term retrospective study (minimum 5 years) was done looking at three groups of anterior cruciate deficient knee patients using both subjective and objective anterior cruciate tests. Twenty-seven chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees reconstructed with the middle third of the patellar tendon and 28 chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees reconstructed with the semitendinosus tendon were included in this consecutive group of patients and were felt to be directly comparable. It was found that the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient group reconstructed with the semitendinosus tendon had 4 excellent, 10 good, 7 poor, and 7 failures with an objective score averaging 4.5 of a possible 12, while the comparable group reconstructed with the middle third of the patellar tendon had 16 excellent, 7 good, 3 poor, and only 1 failure with a score of 10 of a possible 12 (P less than 0.0032). For completeness sake, 20 anterior cruciate deficient knees from this group of consecutive patients that were reconstructed acutely with the semitendinosus tendon were also examined. This group had 8 excellent results, 9 good, 3 poor, and no failures with a score of 9.8 (P less than 0.03 compared to the other group using the semitendinosus tendon). This comparison between the two groups where the semitendinosus tendon was used in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was made only to show the difference between studies dealing with knee reconstructions. There may be a significant difference between a study dealing with acutely reconstructed knees versus one focusing on chronically reconstructed knees, most likely because of both patient selection and time between injury and reconstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.