What predicaments and crises are posed, whose interests are served, and what discourses are advanced when artists use the Qur’an for aesthetic projects? This essay throws light on some of the ethical and ideological energies that have animated today's Muslim art publics by looking at the anxiety and outcry in Indonesia's art world over the use of Qur’anic script in fashion and in painting. I argue that moments of panic or outrage may afford us a special glimpse of ethicopolitical claims as to what is or is not Islamically significant in the field of visual culture, and simultaneously reveal some of the power relations that shape national and global Muslim art publics. By looking at problems that have befallen designer Karl Lagerfeld and Indonesian painter A. D. Pirous, I suggest how a custodial ethics for handling Qur’anic Arabic has played into the hands of Muslim religious conservatives as they extend their authority into national and transnational art worlds, and more generally how Qur’anic art has become a space of struggle over the scope of secularism, religion, and culture. In doing so, I show ways in which the anthropology of art and the anthropology of Islam might fruitfully converge.
Different modalities of music-making are different modalities for exercising social and cultural power, for shaping, challenging, and negotiating relationships of authority and domination. Who performs, who listens, who is silenced, and who may not listen are important factors in this exercise of social and symbolic power. How music-making events shape authority and power in other dimensions of social life is critical, too. Furthermore, the reach of power and authority extends into musical sound. Rhythm, pitch and scalar relationships, melodic structures, antiphony, tempo, all the formal features of performance so often abstracted to construct a music system without regard to its social genesis or dominance in a community comprise a socially constructed and sanctioned set of dispositions and memories with which persons make music (cf. Halbwachs 1980, Schutz 1977). All of which is to say that musics will be caught up inextricably in the social divisions, hierarchies, and conflicts associated with class, ethnicity, and gender. In turn, description and analysis of musical cultures and communities must at some point confront issues of social difference, power, and authority. This article will explore the ways in which music-making and gender differences mutually shape one another in a hill society in island Southeast Asia. The questions raised have to do with the role music-making plays in
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.