Objectives: This study aimed to identify the independent factors associated with depression in community-dwelling older adults in Wuhan, China.Methods: Four hundred and seventy older adults (aged ≥65 years) from four communities dwelling on Junshan Street in Wuhan, China were included in this study. Participants completed a questionnaire that asked questions pertaining to age, gender, educational level, income, living situation, care situation, social support, and social engagement. The 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30), the Fried frailty phenotype scale, the activities of daily living (ADL) scale, the mini nutritional assessment scale-short form (MNA-SF), and the Mini-cog scale were used to assess depression, frailty, self-care ability, malnutritional risk, and cognitive dysfunction, respectively. Differences in age, gender, educational level, income, living situation, care situation, social support, social engagement, ADL score, risk of malnutrition, frailty, and cognitive dysfunction between the non-depression (GDS-30 score <10 points) and depression groups (GDS-30 score ≥10 points) were compared using a chi-square test. Moreover, correlations between factors and depression were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation. Then, significant variables (p < 0.05) from the chi-square test were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to identify the independent factors associated with depression.Results: The incidence of depression among the participants was 14.04%. Age (p < 0.001), educational level (p < 0.001), living situation (p < 0.001), social support (p = 0.001), ADL score (p = 0.023), frailty (p < 0.001), and cognitive dysfunction (p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with depression, in which age, poor social support, frailty, and cognitive dysfunction were identified as independent factors.Conclusion: Improving social support and effective interventions for frailty and cognitive dysfunction may help relieve depression in community-dwelling older adults.

Advanced age, accompanied by impaired glymphatic function, is a key risk factor for many neurodegenerative diseases. To study age-related differences in the human glymphatic system, we measured the influx and efflux activities of the glymphatic system via two non-invasive diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods, ultra-long echo time and low-b diffusion tensor imaging (DTIlow–b) measuring the subarachnoid space (SAS) flow along the middle cerebral artery and DTI analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) along medullary veins in 22 healthy volunteers (aged 21–75 years). We first evaluated the circadian rhythm dependence of the glymphatic activity by repeating the MRI measurements at five time points from 8:00 to 23:00 and found no time-of-day dependence in the awake state under the current sensitivity of MRI measurements. Further test–retest analysis demonstrated high repeatability of both diffusion MRI measurements, suggesting their reliability. Additionally, the influx rate of the glymphatic system was significantly higher in participants aged >45 years than in participants aged 21–38, while the efflux rate was significantly lower in those aged >45 years. The mismatched influx and efflux activities in the glymphatic system might be due to age-related changes in arterial pulsation and aquaporin-4 polarization.

Background:Corticosteroids were recommended by guidelines in severe or critical COVID -19 patients likely to have acute respiratory distress syndrome. In the treatment strategies of COVID -19 in China, corticosteroids were generally combined with some traditional Chinese medicine, especially Lianhua Qingwen Capsule (LHQW). We aimed to investigate the correlation between dexamethasone with or without LHQW and the nucleic acid negative conversion in severe patients with COVID-19.Methods:The clinical course and nucleic acid negative conversion time of 452 consecutive symptomatic COVID-19 patients admitted to the west campus of Union Hospital in Wuhan from January 31, 2020, to March 13, 2020, were evaluated retrospectively. Results:The duration of virus RNA from positive to negative in the participants was 28 days (interquartile range 21-34 days). Of the 452 patients, 105 (23.23%) subjects received dexamethasone, and 347 (76.77%) did not. Among patients receiving LHQW treatment, the nucleic acid negative conversion time in the dexamethasone group was shorter than that in the no dexamethasone group (𝛽, -4.77; 95% CI, -9.41, -0.12). Although among those who were receiving no LHQW treatment, the effect on shortening nucleic acid negative conversion time of dexamethasone was not observed (𝛽, 5.37; 95% CI,-4.88, 15.62; p interaction = 0.038). Additional multivariable propensity-score analyses yielded consistent results with the unmatched participants (β, -8.61; 95% CI, -16.73, -0.50).Conclusions：In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in shortening nucleic acid negative conversion time among those who were receiving LHQW, suggesting that LHQW synergic with dexamethasone accelerated the SARS-CoV-2 clearance in severe patients. Trial registration：ECUH 2020-0212, a retrospective study.