BackgroundStump appendicitis is inflammation of remnant appendix tissue due to incomplete removal of the appendix. Due to appendectomy history, stump appendicitis diagnosis is usually delay and that can cause increase morbidity.MethodsMedical records of patients who had surgery for acute appendicitis at a single center from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. During the evaluation of medical records, patients that had a previous operation for acute appendicitis or had “stump appendicitis” as an exploratory finding in operation notes were included.ResultsAppendectomy was performed in 3130 patients (2630 open surgeries and 380 laparoscopic surgeries). Stump appendicitis was diagnosed in five patients (0.15%). The appendectomies had been performed 4, 5, 7, 7, and 11 years previously. Mean time taken for surgery was 36 h after symptoms began. Open surgery was performed in three patients, laparoscopic procedures in others.ConclusionAwareness of stump appendicitis before radiological examinations may facilitate accurate diagnosis and decrease the duration of the decision-making process, leading to decreased morbidity.
BACKGROUND: The Karaman score is a novel diagnostic scoring system consisting of 6 parameters. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the Karaman score in comparison with the Alvarado score. METHODS: A total of 200 patients who underwent an appendectomy were enrolled in the study (research registry number: 2290). RESULTS: The cutoff threshold of the Karaman score in distinguishing acute appendicitis from negative appendectomy was ≥9 with 84.3% sensitivity, 64.7% specificity, 92.1% positive predictive value (PPV), and 45.8% negative predictive value (NPV). The cutoff threshold of the Alvarado score in distinguishing acute appendicitis from negative appendectomy was ≥8 with 72.9% sensitivity, 70.6% specificity, 92.4% PPV, and 34.8% NPV. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, an Alvarado ≥8 score (Odds ratio [OR]:6.644, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.854-15.466; p<0.001) and a Karaman ≥9 score (OR:10.374, 95% CI: 4.383-24.558; p<0.001) were each individually predictive in distinguishing acute appendicitis from negative appendectomy when correction was made according to age and gender. However, when both scores were evaluated together, the Alvarado score ≥8 lost its efficacy (OR:1.838, 95% CI: 0.517-6.530; p=0.347), whereas the Karaman score ≥9 retained its predictive power (OR:6.586, 95% CI: 1.893-22.917; p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The Karaman score was more predictive than the Alvarado score in distinguishing acute appendicitis from a negative appendectomy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of cases with pilonidal sinus (PS) disease that underwent Limberg flap (LF) transposition and to compare the short and long-term results of early discharge cases with those in the literature. A total of 345 patients who underwent rhomboid excision and LF transposition for PS were evaluated retrospectively. No major anesthetic or surgical complications occurred. Partial wound dehiscence, localized flap necrosis, hematoma, wound infection, and seroma rates were determined as 4.0, 2.1, 1.5, 3.3, and 3.7% respectively. All patients other than those with a hematoma or localized necrosis were discharged with a drain in place 24 hours after the operation. The recurrence rate was 3.9% after a mean 33.1-month follow-up (range, 6-72 months). As a result, we found that short and long-term results of patients who underwent LF and were discharged 24 hours after the operation were similar to those in the literature. We suggest that patients without postoperative complications, such as hematoma or flap necrosis, can be discharged early.
Situs inversus totalis is a rare congenital abnormality with mirror symmetry of mediastinal and abdominal organs. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura is an autoimmune disease with destruction of thrombocytes. This paper is presentation of surgical approach to a case with coexistence of these two conditions.
Expanding view of minimal invasive surgery horizon reveals new practice areas for surgeons and patients. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is an example in progress wondered by many patients and surgeons. Advantages in laparoscopic repair motivate surgeons to discover this popular field. In addition, patients search the most convenient surgical method for themselves today. Laparoscopic approaches to inguinal hernia surgery have become popular as a result of the development of experience about different laparoscopic interventions, and these techniques are increasingly used these days. As other laparoscopic surgical methods, experience is the most important point in order to obtain good results. This chapter aims to show technical details, pitfalls and the literature results about two methods that are commonly used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.