Introduction: Patients with hip fracture are one of the most demanding groups in the health-care system. One of the most important tasks for nurses is to assess pain and ensure the patients are pain free. Pain assessment in patients with dementia is a well-known challenge for health-care professionals due to the patients' difficulties in verbalising pain problems. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the experience of intensive care nurses in assessment of pain in patients with hip fracture and dementia in the postoperative setting. Methods: Data were collected through five focus group discussions using open-ended questions and qualitative content analysis. Twenty-one intensive care nurses (6 men and 15 women) participated in the focus group interviews. Results: Analysis of the data resulted in three main categories: "Communication", "Visual assessment of pain", and "Practical issues" including a number of subcategories. Some of the factors which influence assessment of pain in patients with dementia are the lack of information and knowledge about the patients, which causes loss of time and increased stress. The different forms of communication and ways of assessing pain in these patients were other factors mentioned by nurses as hindrances regarding assessment of the pain. Conclusion: In order to improve assessment of pain, more knowledge and information about the patients are needed and better coordination between the pre-and postoperative departments regarding these patients. In this context, different intervention studies on patient's hip fracture and dementia are needed to increase knowledge and awareness regarding this group of patients.

Background: We aimed to explore the background of refugees emigrating to Sweden and their situation in the new country with special focus on their contacts with the Swedish healthcare system. Material and methods: Our study has a qualitative design. Data was collected between January and October 2013 during face-to-face interviews using open-ended questions. A qualitative content analysis was carried out in accordance with the Graneheim and Lundman method (2004). The participants were 8 women and 7 men, aged between 65 and 86 years who had emigrated from Bosnia and Herzegovina. They had lived in Sweden between 13 and 21 years. Results: The findings revealed that the participants themselves experienced that change of scenery, culture and language influenced their own well-being. The most important finding was that language and communication difficulties are experienced as the major problems. These difficulties implied that all informants were forced to seek help from their children or to use an interpreter when they visited various healthcare institutions. Conclusions: Health care professionals need to be aware of the diverse needs of various ethnic groups in Sweden, some of whom may carry traumatic experiences that could influence their health. In order to provide trans cultural care, a professional staff needs to know that historical, political and socioeconomic factors may influence ethnic minorities. Health care staff needs to recognize that social problems might be medicalized. In particular this article emphasizes the problems associated with language.

I ntroduction: Isolated thoracic injuries are relatively common and they are on the second place as a cause of death overall trauma. Most patients with isolated thoracic injuries are treated on an outpatient basis while only serious cases are hospitalized. The basis of the treatment of thoracic trauma is efficient cardiopulmonary reanimation followed by an early detection and treatment of life threatening injuries. Less than 15% of patients with thoracic trauma require thoracotomy. Patients: Only the patients with exclusively isolated thoracic trauma were analyzed. Results: Based on initial diagnostic procedures initial conservative treatment was indicated and sufficient for 63,75% (204/320) cases while initial surgery treatment was necessary in 36,25% (116/320) of the injured. In relation to the type of surgery the thoracic drainage was performed in 81,03% (94/116) while thoracotomy and VATS procedure was necessary for 7,75% (9/116) of the injured. After the secondary examination or shorter monitoring of the status of the injured, the additional diagnostic procedure was suggested and performed in only 5% (16/320) of the injured. The average period of the hospitalization for all injured with isolated thoracic trauma was 5,9±4,0 days (from 6 hours to 16 days). In cases of patients with blunt injuries the average period of hospitalization was 6,07±4,26 days, while for the patients with penetrating trauma it was 5,4±3,36 days. The calculated value of t-student test (0,2766 > 0,05) indicates that there is no statistically significant difference in the period of the hospitalization in relation to the type of trauma (blunt vs. penetrating). The average period of thoracic drainage was 5,58 ±3,3 days (from 3 to 17 days). The average duration of thoracic drainage in the patients with blunt trauma was 5,81±2,67 days, while in the patients with penetrating trauma it was 5,08±1,99 days. The calculated value of the probability of t -test (0,1478 > 0,05) shows that there is no significant difference in the period of drainage in cases of blunt and penetrating trauma. Out of total number of patients, 98,0% (315/320) of the injured were successfully treated. The complications were found in 1,25% (4/320) cases. Death was the outcome in 1,5% (5/320) of injured. Conclusion: Based on the results of the initial diagnostic treatment, in majority of injured with isolated thoracic trauma, it was possible to conduct the relevant and appropriate therapeutic procedures. On the basis of relatively short period of thoracic drainage, hospitalization and low rates of morbidity and mortality, it may be confirmed that the application of initial diagnostic and therapeutic protocols of the Clinic for thoracic surgery resulted in the achievement of the successful treatments in majority of the injured for this type of the trauma.

Background:Chemical pleurodesis is generally accepted palliative dyspnea therapy and preventive of re-accumulation of pleural fluid in patients with malignant pleural effusions.Aim:Comparative analyses of efficiency of chemical pleurodesis between Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and standard thoracostomy.Methods:From 01.01.2016-01.01.2017 at the Clinic for Thoracic Surgery of University Clinical Center (UCC) Sarajevo retrospective analysis was performed. Studied patients underwent VATS pleurodesis (G1) and standard thoracostomy pleurodesis (G2), with 60 in each group, respecting defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pleurodesis success was examined radiologically over the next three months.Results:Average age of all patients was 63.97±8.75 years. Gender related, 45% were men and 55% were women (F/M=1.47:1). Average hospitalization was 7.22±1.37 (G1: 6.68±1.16; G2: 7.44±1.40; Mann-Whitney U-test: p=0.0016) days. Average thoracic drainage duration was 5.45±1.69, (G1: 4.28±1.15,G2: 6.05±1.58; Mann-Whitney U-test p<0.0001) days. Pleurodesis success after first month was 98.30% in G1, 91.60% in G2 (G1 vs. G2; p=0.2089); after second month was 98.30% in G1, 78.30% in G2 (G1 vs. G2; p=0.0011) and after three months was 91.60% in G1, 63.30% in G2(G1 vs. G2; p=0.0006). Average dyspnea degree (0-5) after the pleurodesis was 0.050±0.22 in G1 and 0.62±0.76 in G2 (Mann-Whitney U-test; p=0.0001). Complication were noticed in 9.2% patients, in G1 3.3%, 15.0% in G2.Conclusion:Difference in pleurodesis efficiency between the G1 and G2 was established after second month and was even more evident after third month in favor of G1. Results show the significant statistical improvement of the degree of dyspnea in G1 as opposite to the G2.

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; To examine whether preoperative tumour size may serve as a biomarker for the occurrence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in centrally and peripherally located lung adenocarcinoma. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; The study included 261 patients surgically treated for diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma. A ROC curve was used to determine the biomarker potential of tumour size relative to the occurrence of LVI. Binary logistic regression was used to show changes of tumour size impact on the status of LVI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Result&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Tumour prevalence according to localization had no statistical significance (p=0.464), while the presence of LVI in central, as well as peripheral positions, was statistically significantly different (p&amp;lt;0.001). The area under the curve of 0.978 highlights the fact that tumour size is an excellent marker of the presence of LVI in centrally located adenocarcinomas of the lung. A similar finding was confirmed in peripherally located lung adenocarcinomas with an area below the curve of 0.943. Binary logistical regression showed that in centrally localized adenocarcinomas of the lung, each additional centimetre of tumour growth represents an increase in the likelihood of LVI+ by 17.14 times. In peripherally located adenocarcinomas of the lung, this increase in likelihood of LVI for each centimetre of growth was 5.46 times. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; With a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, preoperative tumour size may serve as an important biomarker and positive predictor of the presence of LVI in lung adenocarcinoma of any location.&lt;/p&gt;