The characteristics of women booked for surgery were in keeping with the features evidence suggests increases the risk of pathology. There were some discrepancies between patient characteristics elicited in the questionnaires and those indicated by gynaecologists to influence their decision.
Purpose: Medically-focused journal clubs have been used as an educational tool for over 100 years, with research indicating that they improve knowledge, reading behaviour, and critical appraisal skills. However, it is unknown how widespread they are in Australian medical schools, nor the opinions of medical education leaders as to their value.Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was performed among academic leaders from every Australian medical school. Individuals were asked to complete a survey detailing their attitudes towards journal clubs using single- or multiple-answer questions, Likert scales, and ranked data. They were asked whether students at their institutions were able to partake in journal clubs, and if so, provided details on their implementation.Results: At least 1 response was collected from 18 of 19 Australian medical schools. The response rate was 40.8% (60 of 147), and 36 responses (60.0%) were from heads of clinical schools. Respondents from 15 of 18 institutions (83.3%) stated that their institution had a journal club. Of these, 23 (65.7%) were metropolitan institutions and 12 (34.3%) were rural institutions. Eighteen (51.4%) journal clubs were clinician-led, 13 (37.1%) were run through specific hospital departments, and 23 (65.7%) occurred during clinical years. Most respondents (20 [57.1%]) stated that the primary aim of the journal club was to develop critical appraisal skills.Conclusion: Journal clubs are a highly regarded educational tool in the armoury of medical school educators, with significant heterogeneity in their structure, geographic prevalence, and intended purpose. Further studies of their efficacy in teaching evidence-based medicine is warranted.
Introduction: Myomectomy is the gold standard uterine-sparing treatment for fibroids. However, the procedure is often complicated by blood loss. In rare cases, haemorrhage may be so severe that a conversion to hysterectomy is warranted. The aim of our study was to investigate the rates of and the clinical reasoning behind unplanned hysterectomies following attempted myomectomies at our institution. Methods: All patients who underwent an open or laparoscopic myomectomy at the Royal Women's Hospital were identified using a gynaecology unit database, maintained from January 2004 to December 2013. Records for patients whose surgeries were unexpectedly converted to a hysterectomy were examined. A review of the literature was also performed, investigating the rates of unplanned hysterectomies following myomectomies. Results: Of the 1501 myomectomies performed, six resulted in an unplanned hysterectomy; an incidence rate of 0.4%. Fibroids were either intramural or pedunculated with the median number of tumours per patient being 2.5 (interquartile range: 1-6). The largest tumour for each patient varied significantly from 4.0 × 3.2 cm to 29.0 × 25.0 cm. In all cases, despite being strongly advised to have a planned hysterectomy, patients insisted on having a myomectomy. Two patients underwent conversion to hysterectomy intraoperatively while the remainder required a return to theatre. Difficulty achieving intraoperative haemostasis (n = 2), and the development of postoperative bleeding and coagulopathy (n = 4) were reasons cited for proceeding to hysterectomy. Conclusion: The rate of conversion from myomectomy to hysterectomy at our institution was low at 0.4%. In all cases, the reason for conversion was difficulty with haemostasis, despite infrequent use of haemostatic agents, and coagulopathy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.