e16011 Background: Despite consensus guideline recommendations, the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) varies dependent on institution setting. The risk of recurrence of localized bladder cancer after cystectomy is substantial and associated with stage. The current standard of care for possibly T2 and certainly T3-T4 MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin (NAC) based chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. As recent as 2011, only 12% of patients in this category actually received NAC (Feifer et al. 2011). Similar statistics have been confirmed in the US and Canada. Given there is a 13% reduction in risk of death with use of NAC, the adherence to this recommendation needs to improve. We hypothesize that in a multispecialty community practice where barriers to care are reduced that the percentage of eligible patients receiving NAC is significantly higher than previously reported. Methods: After IRB exemption obtained, patients from 2012-2015 with MIBC who underwent cystectomy were examined. Data collection included age, sex, date of consultation, dates and type of chemotherapy received, eGFR, date of surgery and surgical pathology report staging. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whittney and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests. Results: The average patient age was 69 years old with a male predominance. Approximately 54% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, three of those patients did not receive the recommended cisplatin based regimen. Fifty percent of patients received NAC and 57% of cisplatin eligible (age < 80, eGFR > 30) patients received NAC. The average time to cystectomy was 171 days among those receiving NAC, with a decrease in time to cystectomy correlating with age. Conclusions: In a community group practice, adherence to standard of care recommendations for higher stage MIBC patients to receive NAC are significantly higher than recently reported values, 50% vs 12%, respectfully. This was achieved while maintaining acceptable time to cystectomy. This supports our hypothesis that when barriers to care are decreased in a community group practice, high quality standards of care can be effectively delivered. In the future, 5 year overall survival will also be important to evaluate in this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.