Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a direct‐writing technology for small diameter fibers; however, due to electrostatic attraction, the technique is restricted in how close these microfibers can be positioned on the collector. Here, the minimum interfiber distance between parallel poly(ε‐caprolactone) MEW microfibers is determined for different fiber diameters and number of layers on noncoated and star‐shaped poly(ethylene oxide‐stat‐propylene oxide) (sP(EO‐stat‐PO))‐coated glass coverslips. The effect of the fiber diameter, the number of fiber layers, and shape of turning loops affect precision and the minimum interfiber distance. Single fibers with diameter of 5, 10, and 15 µm have a minimum interfiber distance without fiber bridging of 33 ± 2.7, 54 ± 2.2, and 62 ± 2.7 µm, respectively. Increasing the number of layers to ten increases this minimum interfiber distance approximately twofold to 60 ± 3.5, 97 ± 4.5, and 102 ± 2.7 µm for the increasing fiber diameters. The sP(EO‐stat‐PO) slightly increases the minimum interfiber distance for the 15 µm diameter group only, with spacing for the 5 and 10 µm fibers unaffected by the coating. Identifying and determining the fabrication limits for MEW is highly instructional for users working and designing scaffolds with this technology.

Over the past decade, melt electrowriting (MEW) has established the fundamental understanding of processing (and printer) requirements. Iterative work on parametric development and dissemination of this recent additive manufacturing technology has been performed across many systems and polymers (mainly poly-(𝝐-caprolactone)), showing similarities and trends. However, the software and hardware ecosystems of MEW are not mature. Further, due to its multi-parametric nature, MEW can be challenging for laboratories to master. This review intends to provide a unique perspective on the dynamic relationship between MEW processing parameters. Such parameters can be divided into 1) those that affect the polymer flow rate to or 2) from the nozzle, and 3) environmental conditions. The most influential parameters for high-quality printing are applied voltage, applied pressure, collector speed, polymer temperature, nozzle diameter, and the conditions that lead to charge buildup (e.g., relative humidity). Other factors such as ambient temperature, nozzle size, and protrusion, collector temperature and conductivity, and collector distance can all affect the process. Success for MEW printing means fibers fall onto the collector according to their pre-programmed path with predicted fiber diameter. Here, the authors elucidate how the dynamic relationship between these parameters can converge into ideal printing conditions to produce scaffolds.

No abstract

No abstract