Macitentan, also called Actelion-1 or -6-(2-(5-bromopyrimidin-2-yloxy)ethoxy)-pyrimidin-4-yl]-NЈ-propylaminosulfonamide], is a new dual ET A / ET B endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist designed for tissue targeting. Selection of macitentan was based on inhibitory potency on both ET receptors and optimization of physicochemical properties to achieve high affinity for lipophilic milieu. In vivo, macitentan is metabolized into a major and pharmacologically active metabolite, ACT-132577. Macitentan and its metabolite antagonized the specific binding of ET-1 on membranes of cells overexpressing ET A and ET B receptors and blunted ET-1-induced calcium mobilization in various natural cell lines, with inhibitory constants within the nanomolar range. In functional assays, macitentan and ACT-132577 inhibited ET-1-induced contractions in isolated endothelium-denuded rat aorta (ET A receptors) and sarafotoxin S6c-induced contractions in isolated rat trachea (ET B receptors). In rats with pulmonary hypertension, macitentan prevented both the increase of pulmonary pressure and the right ventricle hypertrophy, and it markedly improved survival. In diabetic rats, chronic administration of macitentan decreased blood pressure and proteinuria and prevented end-organ damage (renal vascular hypertrophy and structural injury). In conclusion, macitentan, by its tissuetargeting properties and dual antagonism of ET receptors, protects against end-organ damage in diabetes and improves survival in pulmonary hypertensive rats. This profile makes macitentan a new agent to treat cardiovascular disorders associated with chronic tissue ET system activation.

Urotensin-II (U-II) is a cyclic peptide now described as the most potent vasoconstrictor known. U-II binds to a specific G protein-coupled receptor, formerly the orphan receptor GPR14, now renamed urotensin receptor (UT receptor), and present in mammalian species. Palosuran (ACT-058362; 1-[2-(4-benzyl-4-hydroxy-piperidin-1-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2-methyl-quinolin-4-yl)-urea sulfate salt) is a new potent and specific antagonist of the human UT receptor. ACT-058362 antagonizes the specific binding of 125 Ilabeled U-II on natural and recombinant cells carrying the human UT receptor with a high affinity in the low nanomolar range and a competitive mode of antagonism, revealed only with prolonged incubation times. ACT-058362 also inhibits U-II-induced calcium mobilization and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. The binding inhibitory potency of ACT-058362 is more than 100-fold less on the rat than on the human UT receptor, which is reflected in a pDЈ 2 value of 5.2 for inhibiting contraction of isolated rat aortic rings induced by U-II. In functional assays of short incubation times, ACT-058362 behaves as an apparent noncompetitive inhibitor. In vivo, intravenous ACT-058362 prevents the no-reflow phenomenon, which follows renal artery clamping in rats, without decreasing blood pressure and prevents the subsequent development of acute renal failure and the histological consequences of ischemia. In conclusion, the in vivo efficacy of the specific UT receptor antagonist ACT-058362 reveals a role of endogenous U-II in renal ischemia. As a selective renal vasodilator, ACT-058362 may be effective in other renal diseases.

Since its discovery in 1988 by Yanagisawa et al., endothelin (ET), a potent vasoconstrictor, has been widely implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal diseases. Many research groups have embarked on the discovery and development of ET receptor antagonists for the treatment of such diseases. While several compounds, e.g., ambrisentan 2, are in late clinical trials for various indications, one compound (bosentan, Tracleer) is being marketed to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. Inspired by the structure of ambrisentan 2, we designed a novel class of ET receptor antagonists based on a 1,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-2-one scaffold. Here, we report on the preparation as well as the in vitro and in vivo structure-activity relationships of these derivatives. Potent dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists with affinities in the low nanomolar range have been identified. In addition, several compounds efficiently reduced arterial blood pressure after oral administration to Dahl salt sensitive rats. In this animal model, the efficacy of the benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-2-one derivative rac-39au was superior to that of racemic ambrisentan, rac-2.

Selexipag [2-{4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide] is an orally available prostacyclin (PGI 2 ) receptor (IP receptor) agonist that is chemically distinct from PGI 2 and is in clinical development for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Selexipag is highly selective for the human IP receptor in vitro, whereas analogs of PGI 2 can activate prostanoid receptors other than the IP receptor. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of selectivity for the IP receptor on gastric function by measuring 1) contraction of rat gastric fundus ex vivo and 2) the rates of gastric emptying and intestinal transport in response to selexipag in comparison with other PGI 2 analogs. The rat gastric fundus expresses mRNA encoding multiple prostanoid receptors to different levels: prostaglandin E receptor 1 (EP 1 ) Ͼ prostaglandin E receptor 3 (EP 3 ), IP receptor Ͼ prostaglandin D 2 receptor 1, thromboxane receptor. Selexipag and metabolite {4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid (ACT-333679) did not contract gastric fundus at concentrations up to 10 Ϫ3 M. In contrast, the PGI 2 analogs iloprost and beraprost evoked concentration-dependent contraction of gastric fundus. Contraction to treprostinil was observed at high concentration (10 Ϫ4 M). Contraction to all PGI 2 analogs was mediated via activation of EP 3 receptors, although EP 1 receptors also contributed to the contraction of gastric fundus to iloprost and beraprost. Antagonism of IP receptors did not affect responses. Oral selexipag did not significantly alter gastric function in vivo, as measured by rates of stomach emptying and intestinal transport, whereas beraprost slowed gastrointestinal transport. The high functional selectivity of selexipag and ACT-333679 for the IP receptor precludes a stimulatory action on gastric smooth muscle and may help minimize gastric side effects such as nausea and vomiting.

{4-[(5,6-Diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy}acetic acid (ACT-333679) is the main metabolite of the selective prostacyclin (PGI 2 ) receptor (IP receptor) agonist selexipag. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of IP receptor selectivity on the vasorelaxant efficacy of ACT-333679 and the PGI 2 analog treprostinil in pulmonary artery under conditions associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Selexipag and ACT-333679 evoked full relaxation of pulmonary artery from control and monocrotaline (MCT)-PAH rats, and ACT-333679 relaxed normal pulmonary artery contracted with either endothelin-1 (ET-1) or phenylephrine. In contrast, treprostinil evoked weaker relaxation than ACT-333679 of control pulmonary artery and failed to induce relaxation of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats. Treprostinil did not evoke relaxation of normal pulmonary artery contracted with either ET-1 or phenylephrine. Expression of prostaglandin E 3 (EP 3 ) receptor mRNA was increased in pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats.In contraction experiments, the selective EP 3 receptor agonist sulprostone evoked significantly greater contraction of pulmonary artery from MCT-PAH rats compared with control rats. The presence of a threshold concentration of ET-1 significantly augmented the contractile response to sulprostone in normal pulmonary artery. ACT-333679 did not evoke direct contraction of rat pulmonary artery, whereas treprostinil evoked concentration-dependent contraction that was inhibited by the EP 3 receptor antagonist (2E)-3-(3Ј,4Ј-dichlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-N-(2-thienylsulfonyl)acrylamide. Antagonism of EP 3 receptors also revealed a relaxant response to treprostinil in normal pulmonary artery contracted with ET-1. These data demonstrate that the relaxant efficacy of the selective IP receptor agonist selexipag and its metabolite ACT-333679 is not modified under conditions associated with PAH, whereas relaxation to treprostinil may be limited in the presence of mediators of disease.

Prostacyclin controls cardiovascular function via activation of the prostacyclin receptor. Decreased prostacyclin production occurs in several cardiovascular diseases. However, the clinical use of prostacyclin and its analogues is complicated by their chemical and metabolic instability. A medicinal chemistry program searched for novel nonprostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonists not subject to these limitations. A compound with a diphenylpyrazine structural core was synthesized. Metabolic stability and agonist potency were optimized through modification of the linear side chain. Compound 12b (MRE-269, ACT-333679) was identified as a potent and highly selective prostacyclin receptor agonist. Replacement of the terminal carboxyl group with an N-acylsulfonamide group yielded parent compound 26a (selexipag, NS-304, ACT-293987), which is orally active and provides sustained plasma exposure of 12b. Compound 26a was developed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and shown to reduce the risk of the composite morbidity/mortality end point in a phase 3 event-driven clinical trial.

Prostacyclin (PGI 2 ) receptor (IP receptor) agonists, which are indicated for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), increase cytosolic cAMP levels and thereby inhibit pulmonary vasoconstriction, pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cell (PASMC) proliferation, and extracellular matrix synthesis. Selexipag (Uptravi, 2-{4-[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]-butoxy}-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide) is the first nonprostanoid IP receptor agonist, it is available orally and was recently approved for the treatment of PAH. In this study we show that the active metabolite of selexipag and the main contributor to clinical efficacy ACT-333679 (previously known as MRE-269) behaved as a full agonist in multiple PAH-relevant receptor-distal-or downstream-cellular assays with a maximal efficacy (E max ) comparable to that of the prototypic PGI 2 analog iloprost. In PASMC, ACT-333679 potently induced cellular relaxation (EC 50 4.3 nM) and inhibited cell proliferation (IC 50 4.0 nM) as well as extracellular matrix synthesis (IC 50 8.3 nM). In contrast, ACT-333679 displayed partial agonism in receptor-proximal-or upstream-cAMP accumulation assays (E max 56%) when compared with iloprost and the PGI 2 analogs beraprost and treprostinil (E max ∼100%). Partial agonism of ACT-333679 also resulted in limited b-arrestin recruitment (E max 40%) and lack of sustained IP receptor internalization, whereas all tested PGI 2 analogs behaved as full agonists in these desensitization-related assays. In line with these in vitro findings, selexipag, but not treprostinil, displayed sustained efficacy in rat models of pulmonary and systemic hypertension. Thus, the partial agonism of ACT-333679 allows for full efficacy in amplified receptor-distal PAH-relevant readouts while causing limited activity in desensitization-related receptorproximal readouts.

The P2Y12 receptor is a validated target for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare two direct‐acting, reversible P2Y12 antagonists, ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor, in a rat thrombosis model by simultaneous quantification of their antithrombotic efficacy and surgery‐induced blood loss. Blood flow velocity was assessed in the carotid artery after FeCl3‐induced thrombus formation using a Doppler flow probe. At the same time, blood loss after surgical wounding of the spleen was quantified. Continuous infusions of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor prevented the injury‐induced reduction of blood flow in a dose‐dependent manner. High doses of both antagonists normalized blood flow and completely abolished thrombus formation as confirmed by histology. Intermediate doses restored baseline blood flow to ≥65%. However, ACT‐246475 caused significantly less increase of blood loss than ticagrelor; the difference in blood loss was 2.6‐fold (P < 0.01) at high doses and 2.7‐fold (P < 0.05) at intermediate doses. Potential reasons for this unexpected difference were explored by measuring the effects of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor on vascular tone. At concentrations needed to achieve maximal antithrombotic efficacy, ticagrelor compared with ACT‐246475 significantly increased carotid blood flow velocity in vivo (P = 0.003), induced vasorelaxation of precontracted rat femoral arteries, and inhibited contraction of femoral artery induced by electrical field stimulation or by phenylephrine. Overall, ACT‐246475 showed a significantly wider therapeutic window than ticagrelor. The absence of vasodilatory effects due to high selectivity of ACT‐246475 for P2Y12 provides potential arguments for the observed safety advantage of ACT‐246475 over ticagrelor.