Recurrent hepatitis C causes significant morbidity after liver transplantation. Because immunosuppression is associated with enhanced viral replication, we postulated that clinical recurrence of the disease may be associated with augmented immunosuppression for rejection. In 96 patients with hepatitis C who received liver transplants, we recorded the interval from transplantation to recurrence, the episodes of steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) requiring OKT3, the number of rejection episodes, and the use of OKT3 induction. Recurrence was diagnosed based on elevated transaminases and characteristic histology. Hepatitis C recurred in 43 of 96 patients. Fifteen of 21 patients (71.4%) who previously had SRR had recurrence, versus 28 of 75 patients (37.3%) who either had no SRR (72 patients) or had it after recurrence was diagnosed (3 patients) (P < .01). Mean time to recurrence was 127 +/- 31 days in the 15 patients who had had SRR versus 246 +/- 42 days in the other 28 patients (P = .02). Recurrence and number of rejection episodes were clearly associated: 6 of 33 patients (18.2%) with no rejection had recurrence (P < .05), versus 11 of 26 patients (42.3%) with one rejection episode (P < .05) and 26 of 37 (70.2%) with more than 1 episode (P < .05). OKT3 induction was used in 15 patients; 9 of 15 patients had recurrence (ns) at 337 +/- 95 days. Of 72 patients who initially received triple immunosuppression, 30 patients had recurrence at 186 +/- 25 days (P = .05). Nine patients received primary FK506; 4 had recurrence at 68 +/- 14 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Using liver allografts with warm or cold ischemia, we evaluated functional and morphological alterations in hepatocytes, sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells in a rat transplantation model. All recipients of allografts with either 4 hr of cold or 30 min of warm ischemia lived more than 22 days and were judged viable. On the other hand, all recipients of grafts with 6 hr of cold or 60 min of warm ischemia died within 2 days and were therefore judged to be nonviable. With these viable and nonviable allograft models, hepatocyte function was evaluated by the bile output and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels; endothelial cell function was judged by the serum hyaluronic acid level, and Kupffer cell function was measured by an intravenous colloidal carbon clearance test. Hepatocyte injury was the prominent feature in warm ischemic grafts, especially in the nonviable ones. On the other hand, serum hyaluronic acid values were significantly higher in the nonviable cold ischemic group, compared with the viable counterpart, suggesting that the functional depression of endothelial cells was predominant in cold, nonviable livers. Histological examinations coincided with the above findings. The phagocytic activity of Kupffer cells was depressed by warm or cold ischemia, whereas the number of Kupffer cells was reduced in the warm ischemia group. We conclude that in liver allografts the main site of injury in warm ischemia is the hepatocytes and suggest that cold ischemia is associated with endothelial cell damage.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of graft size on recipients in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to establish a clinical guideline for the minimum requirement. Summary Background DataAlthough the minimum graft size required for LDLT has been reported to be 30% to 40% of graft volume (GV)/standard liver volume (SLV), the safety limit of the graft size was unknown. MethodsA total of 33 cases of LDLT, excluding auxiliary transplantation, were reviewed with a minimum observation period of 4 months. The 33 patients were divided into three groups according to GV/SLV: medium-size graft group, small-size graft group, and extra-small graft group. The effect of GV/SLV on graft function, graft regeneration, and survival was evaluated. ResultsThe overall patient survival rate was 94% at a mean follow-up of 15 months with a minimum observation period of 4 months. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative bilirubin clearance, alanine aminotransferase, prothrombin time, and frequency of postoperative complications among the three groups. One week after transplantation, the regeneration rate (GV at 1 week/harvested GV) in the extra-small and small groups was significantly higher than that of the medium group. The graft and patient survival rates were both 100% in the extra-small group, 75% and 88% in the small group, and 90% and 95% in the medium group. ConclusionsSmall-for-size grafts less than 30% of SLV can be used with careful intraoperative and postoperative management until the grafts regenerate.Since the first success in 1989, 1 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been refined and accepted as a valuable treatment for patients with terminal liver disease. 2Although LDLT was originally developed as a response to the shortage of pediatric donors, this procedure has recently been extended to adult patients in countries where the availability of cadaveric donors is severely restricted.3 Accompanying these trends, there has been a move toward increasing the size of harvested grafts, from an extended lateral segment to an extended left lobe, and to right lobe grafts. 4 However, donor safety in LDLT must remain a prerequisite. The major concern in using LDLT for adult patients is the adequacy of the size of the graft that can be safely harvested from the donor. The Shinshu University group accepted a donor-recipient combination that gives an estimated graft volume (GV)/standard liver volume (SLV) ratio of more than 30%.3 Lo et al 5 reported that a graft with GV/SLV of 40% or less should be regarded as a marginal graft that would have a lower success rate. However, experience with adult-to-adult LDLT is limited, and the minimum graft size remains unknown. In the current study, we investigated whether a small GV/SLV ratio was correlated with a poorer outcome in LDLT.
In conclusion, the use of a fatty liver graft up to the moderate level can be justified in LDLT, even though ischemia-reperfusion injury tends to be severe in such grafts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.