Recent neuroimaging studies have shown the importance of the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception. However, little is known about the role of each of these regions during deception. Using positron emission tomography (PET), we measured brain activation while participants told truths or lies about two types of real-world events: experienced and unexperienced. The imaging data revealed that activity of the dorsolateral, ventrolateral and medial prefrontal cortices was commonly associated with both types of deception (pretending to know and pretending not to know), whereas activity of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was only associated with pretending not to know. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) increase in the ACC was positively correlated with that in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex only during pretending not to know. These results suggest that the lateral and medial prefrontal cortices have general roles in deception, whereas the ACC contributes specifically to pretending not to know.

Delayed imaging that coincides with the highest uptake of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) by tumour may be advantageous in oncological positron emission tomography (PET), where delineation of metastasis from normal tissue background is important. In order to identify the better imaging protocol for tumour detection, whole-body FDG-PET images acquired at 1 h and 2 h after injection were evaluated in 22 subjects, with a post-injection transmission scan at 90 min for attenuation correction. After visual interpretation, tumour uptake [tumour standardised uptake ratio (SUR)], normal tissue uptake (normal SUR) and tumour to background contrast (tumour SUR/normal tissue SUR) were evaluated in the images acquired at 1 h and at 2 h. Most malignant lesions, including primary lung cancer, metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes and lymphoma lesions, showed higher FDG uptake at 2 h than at 1 h. By contrast, benign lesions, with the exception of sarcoidosis, showed lower uptake of FDG at 2 h than at 1 h. Among normal tissues, the kidney, liver, mediastinum, lung, upper abdomen and left abdomen showed significant falls in FDG uptake from 1 h to 2 h. The lower abdomen, right abdomen and muscles (shoulder and thigh) showed no significant changes. Consequently, malignant lesions of the lung, mediastinum and upper abdomen showed significant increases in tumour to background contrast from 1 to 2 h. Three lesions (two lung cancers and a malignant lymphoma) that were equivocal on 1-h images became evident on 2-h images, changing the results of interpretation. All other malignant lesions were detected on 1-h images, but were clearer, with higher contrast, on 2-h images. Lesion-based sensitivity was improved from 92% (49/53) to 98% (52/53), and patient-based sensitivity from 78% (14/18) to 94% (17/18). It is concluded that delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging is a better and more reliable imaging protocol for tumour detection.

In advanced head and neck cancer, an organ-sparing approach comprising radiation therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy has become an important technique. However, the high incidence of residual masses after therapy remains a problem. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the use of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) delayed imaging for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy, and compared the FDG-PET results with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Forty-three lesions from 36 patients with head and neck cancer suspected to represent recurrence after radio-chemotherapy (median interval from therapy, 4 months) were studied. PET was performed at 2 h after FDG injection, and evaluated. The results were compared to those of contrast studies with MRI or CT performed within 2 weeks of the PET study, and to histological diagnosis (in all patients suspected of having recurrence) or clinical diagnosis. The lesion-based sensitivity (visual interpretation) and negative predictive value of FDG-PET (88% and 91%, respectively) were higher than those of MRI/CT (75% and 67% respectively). The specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of FDG-PET (78%, 81% and 70%, respectively) were significantly ( P<0.05) higher than those of MRI/CT (30%, 47% and 39% respectively). Three of six patients with false positive findings had post-therapy inflammation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that retrospective evaluation with the standardised uptake ratio yielded the best results (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 81.5%), followed by visual interpretation and then the tumour/neck muscle ratio. An FDG-PET delayed imaging protocol yielded significantly better results for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy than MRI/CT. Because of the high negative predictive value of FDG-PET (91.3%), if PET is negative, further invasive procedures may be unnecessary.

The result of actual driving looked similar to that of simulated driving, suggesting that visual perception and visuomotor coordination were the main brain functions while driving. In terms of attention and autonomic arousal, however, it seems there was a significant difference between simulated and actual driving possibly due to risk of accidents. Autonomic and emotional aspects of driving should be studied using an actual driving study-design.