No abstract

Background: Identifying patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease is important in managing patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: We evaluated a series of prognostic values: flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrogen-mediated dilation (NMD), an index of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent function, respectively, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Results: A cohort of 199 patients was studied. At entry, these values were examined and the prognostic significances were investigated. In estimating the significance of baPWV, patients with ABI <0.9 were excluded. During the follow-up period, 24 deaths occurred including 14 cardiovascular and 10 noncardiovascular fatal events. Overall, the survival rates were significantly lower in the low ABI than in the high ABI group, but the survival rates were not significantly different between the high and low FMD, NMD, or baPWV groups. Cardiovascular survival rates were significantly lower in the low ABI than in the high ABI group, and in the high baPWV than in the low baPWV group. The survival rates were not significantly different between the high and low FMD or NMD groups. Conclusions: Screening hemodialysis patients by means of ABI and baPWV but not FMD or NMD provides complementary information in identifying a high-risk population in these patients.

Objectives Cilnidipine is a calcium channel blocker that blocks both L and N-type calcium channels. L/N-type calcium channel blockers exhibit sympatholytic action and a renal protective effect via dilation of afferent and efferent arterioles of the renal glomerulus, and afford more potent protection against hypertension-related organ damage than L-type calcium channel blockers. Few studies, however, have directly compared the organ protective effects of L-type calcium channel blocker monotherapy and L/N-type calcium channel blocker monotherapy. This study compares the effects on renal and vascular endothelial functions and arterial stiffness of monotherapy regimens of amlodipine, an L-type calcium antagonist, and cilnidipine, in patients with essential hypertension.Methods Fifty patients with untreated essential hypertension were randomized to receive 5 mg of amlodipine (n U 25) or 10 mg of cilnidipine (n U 25) once daily in the morning for 24 weeks. The patients were evaluated before and after the therapy to assess changes in renal function, flow-mediated vasodilation (a parameter of vascular endothelial function), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (a parameter of arterial stiffness).Results Before treatment, the above parameters showed no significant differences between groups. After treatment, urinary albumin excretion was decreased significantly in the cilnidipine group compared with the amlodipine group, and the decrease of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was significantly larger in the cilnidipine group than in the amlodipine group.Conclusions These results suggest that cilnidipine is more effective than amlodipine at improving renal function and arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertension.

PurposeAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody therapy is an effective treatment for ocular angiogenesis. Although the intraocular pressure of some patients increases after anti-VEGF therapy, the effects of VEGF-A on the aqueous humor outflow pathway remain unknown. This study investigated the effects of VEGF-A on the aqueous humor outflow pathway.MethodsWe used human recombinant VEGF121 and VEGF165. Trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm’s canal endothelial (SCE) cells were isolated from the eyes of cynomolgus monkeys. Expression of mRNA coding four VEGF receptors, VEGFR1 (FLT1), VEGFR2 (KDR), neuropilin-1, and neuropilin-2, was examined by RT-PCR. To evaluate the permeability of cell monolayers, we measured transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER). The outflow facility was measured in perfused porcine anterior segment organ cultures treated with 30 ng/mL VEGF121 for 48 h.ResultsFour VEGF-A-related receptor mRNAs were expressed in TM and SCE cells. The TEER of TM cells was not significantly affected by VEGF121 or VEGF165 treatment. In contrast, the TEER of SCE cells was significantly lower 48 h after treatment with 30 ng/mL VEGF121 to 69.4 ± 12.2% of baseline (n = 10), which was a significant difference compared with the control (P = 0.0001). VEGF165 (30 ng/mL) decreased the TEER of SCE cells at 48 h after treatment to 72.3 ± 14.1% compared with the baseline (n = 10), which was not a significant difference compared with the control (P = 0.0935). Ki8751, a selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, completely suppressed the effect of VEGF121 on SCE cell permeability, although ZM306416, a selective VEGFR1 inhibitor, did not affect the VEGF121-induced decrease in TEER. Perfusion with 30 ng/mL of VEGF121 for 48 h significantly increased the outflow facility compared with the control (47.8 ± 28.5%, n = 5, P = 0.013).ConclusionsThese results suggest that VEGF-A may regulate the conventional aqueous outflow of SCE cells through VEGFR2.

Background: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is effective in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). In the present study, we attempted to determine whether LDL apheresis is effective even for PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis, who tend to be refractory to any treatment, and if so, to determine the mechanism of its efficacy. Methods: Serum levels of lipids and vascular growth factors, leg symptom, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation were investigated before and after 10 sessions of LDL apheresis in 11 PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Results: Serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride exhibited drastic reduction, which completely disappeared 4 weeks after the final apheresis. Resting leg pain was improved in 6 cases even 4 weeks after final apheresis. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was significantly increased 4 weeks after final apheresis (1.6 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 1.0%, p < 0.05). Levels of vascular growth factors, hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor were not changed during treatment. Conclusions: These findings suggested that LDL apheresis is effective even in PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Our findings suggest that its mechanisms of efficacy include improvement of vascular endothelial dysfunction, in addition to drastic but acute reduction of lipid levels. Since PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis tend to be resistant to any treatment and are at high risk for lower-extremity amputation, LDL apheresis could be a useful strategy for treatment of them.