Enhancing multi-disciplinary CMHTs with FACT provides a clinically effective alternative to AO teams. FACT offers a cost-effective model compared to AO.
Aims and methodTo create a simulated patient with psychosis for psychiatric training within the online virtual environment of Second Life. After design and delivery of the scenario, medical students were asked to complete it and provide feedback.ResultsA total of 24 students tried the scenario and gave feedback via an online survey. The project had been offered to 150 students so the take up was low. The feedback was predominantly negative with 53 critical responses to 32 positive ones. The consensus was that the scenario was cumbersome, did not imitate real life and was of little educational value. Multimedia representations of psychotic symptoms were more positively received and there may be scope for further development.Clinical implicationsInteractive technology has a role in psychiatric education but we would not recommend the use of scenarios that rely predominantly on verbal communication within Second Life.
How to interpret different results for CRHTT data Jacobs & Barrenho 1 used the same data as Glover et al 2 when they were comparing admissions in primary care trusts with and without crisis resolution and home treatment teams (CRHTTs). However, they employed different methods for their analysis and reached conflicting conclusions. According to Jacobs & Barrenho, the introduction of CRHTTs did not have a statistically significant influence on the number of admissions, while Glover et al found a significant reduction especially for CRHTTs which offered a 24-hour service. In their article, Jacobs & Barrenho 1 do report a reduction in admissions (e.g. Fig. 4) but state that it was not statistically significant. They do not mention power calculations. There were usable data available from 229 primary care trusts (PCTs) and the authors conducted various complex analyses by using a number of control factors and by studying trends over time. It could be that their lack of statistically significant findings is because of a lack of power. If this is the case, there is no fundamental difference between their findings and the previous analysis. 2 At the end of their article, the authors make the suggestion that perhaps data should be analysed at the level of CRHTTs and not at the level of PCTs, given that there is huge variation between CRHTTs. We concur with that suggestion and we would like to go even further and suggest that future studies look at the service actually provided to individual patients in terms of how many visits are undertaken over a specified number of days. This information is readily available from most electronic notes systems. Further study is needed to investigate the types of interventions provided, such as whether medication was prescribed and administered, whether specific psychological treatments were offered, and so on. The availability of such data will allow an informed decision to be made about what is required to avoid admission to hospital and whether a CRHTT is the best organisational format to deliver that care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.