In this paper, we present the SemEval-2019 Task 3-EmoContext: Contextual Emotion Detection in Text. Lack of facial expressions and voice modulations make detecting emotions in text a challenging problem. For instance, as humans, on reading "Why don't you ever text me!" we can either interpret it as a sad or angry emotion and the same ambiguity exists for machines. However, the context of dialogue can prove helpful in detection of the emotion. In this task, given a textual dialogue i.e. an utterance along with two previous turns of context, the goal was to infer the underlying emotion of the utterance by choosing from four emotion classes-Happy, Sad, Angry and Others. To facilitate the participation in this task, textual dialogues from user interaction with a conversational agent were taken and annotated for emotion classes after several data processing steps. A training data set of 30160 dialogues, and two evaluation data sets, Test1 and Test2, containing 2755 and 5509 dialogues respectively were released to the participants. A total of 311 teams made submissions to this task. The final leader-board was evaluated on Test2 data set, and the highest ranked submission achieved 79.59 micro-averaged F1 score. Our analysis of systems submitted to the task indicate that Bi-directional LSTM was the most common choice of neural architecture used, and most of the systems had the best performance for the Sad emotion class, and the worst for the Happy emotion class.

Informational chatbots provide a highly effective medium for improving operational efficiency in answering customer queries for any enterprise. Chatbots are also preferred by users/customers since unlike other alternatives like calling customer care or browsing over FAQ pages, chatbots provide instant responses, are easy to use, are less invasive and are always available. In this paper, we discuss the problem of FAQ answering which is central to designing a retrieval-based informational chatbot. Given a set of FAQ pages s for an enterprise, and a user query, we need to find the best matching question-answer pairs from s. Building such a semantic ranking system that works well across domains for large QA databases with low runtime and model size is challenging. Previous work based on feature engineering or recurrent neural models either provides low accuracy or incurs high runtime costs. We experiment with multiple transformer based deep learning models, and also propose a novel MT-DNN (Multi-task Deep Neural Network)-based architecture, which we call Masked MT-DNN (or MMT-DNN). MMT-DNN significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art transformer models for the FAQ answering task. Further, we propose an improved knowledge distillation component to achieve ∼2.4x reduction in model-size and ∼7x reduction in runtime while maintaining similar accuracy. On a small benchmark dataset from SemEval 2017 CQA Task 3, we show that our approach provides an NDCG@1 of 83.1. On another large dataset of ∼281K instances corresponding to ∼30K queries from diverse domains, our distilled 174 MB model provides an NDCG@1 of 75.08 with a CPU runtime of mere 31 ms establishing a new state-of-the-art for FAQ answering.

In recent years, the fields of NLP and information retrieval have made tremendous progress thanks to deep learning models like RNNs and LSTMs, and Transformer [35] based models like BERT [9]. But these models are humongous in size. Real world applications however demand small model size, low response times and low computational power wattage. We will discuss six different types of methods (pruning, quantization, knowledge distillation, parameter sharing, matrix decomposition, and other Transformer based methods) for compression of such models to enable their deployment in real industry NLP projects. Given the critical need of building applications with efficient and small models, and the large amount of recently published work in this area, we believe that this tutorial is very timely. We will organize related work done by the 'deep learning for NLP' community in the past few years and present it as a coherent story. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Neural networks; Machine learning; Natural language processing; • Theory of computation → Models of learning.

No abstract

No abstract