ObjectiveFood safety risk management is an important cross-boundary issue from both theoretical and practical standpoints. Because food safety has the social attributes of public goods, public-public collaboration can be considered a particularly important mode of cross-boundary governance. The study aims to provide a theoretical basis for the Chinese government to promote public-public collaboration for food safety risk management by identifying key factors.MethodsBased on a review of literature across diverse fields, such as political science, sociology, and new public governance, this study discusses the essence, modes, and dilemma of public-public collaboration for food safety risk management using practical explorations in various countries as the main thread and taking into account the actual situation in China. Moreover, this study quantitatively analyzes the relationships between the dimensions and factors affecting public-public collaboration and identifies key dimensions and factors using the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-based Analytic Network Process (DANP).ResultsAmong the 20 factors in the calculation results of DANP, Lawmaking has the highest value of (fi+ei) (7.022) and ranks sixth in terms of influence weight. The (fi+ei)value of Professionalism (6.993) ranks second and its influence weight ranks fourth. The (fi+ei) value of Administrative enforcement (6.722) ranks fifth, and its influence weight ranks seventh. The (fi+ei) value of Improvement of the social environment (6.699) ranks sixth, and its influence weight ranks fifth. The (fi+ei) value of Legal authorization (6.614) ranks seventh, and its influence weight ranks tenth. Data analysis indicated that these are the five key factors affecting the governance capacity in public-public collaboration for food safety risk management.ConclusionThe legal basis is the most important dimension affecting public-public collaboration. Legislation-based governance, administrative law enforcement–based governance, and social environment improvement–based governance in the behavior and capabilities dimension, professionalism in the basic characteristics dimension, and laws and regulations in the legal basis dimension are the five key factors.

Objective: Given that positive psychological capital motivates citizens to actively participate in social affairs, this study aims to provide insight into food safety risk management in China by empirically determining which individual characteristics are associated with positive psychological capital for actively participating in social co-governance.Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was undertaken between December 5 and 10, 2020. The study participants were residents of Wuxi in China over the age of 18 years. A validated and pretested questionnaires was used to elicit responses with the participants. Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance were performed to determine which individual characteristics are significantly correlated with the psychological capital of citizens who participate in co-governance. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were performed for each individual characteristic with a significant correlation to determine which categories of these characteristics yielded the significant differences. Study data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0.Results: A total of 752 completed responses were received. Most respondents were females (52.39%), aged 26–45 (66.09%), married (70.48%), company employees (44.28%), and in good health (89.76%). Most had a household size of 3 (55.98%), a bachelor's degree (40.96%), a personal annual income of more than 100,000 yuan (26.46%), and no children aged under 18 (50.27%) or pregnant women (93.22%) in their households. Data analysis indicated that education, income, and health status significantly associate with the psychological capital of citizens to participate in co-governance. Citizens with high education, high income, and good health status have higher psychological capital to participate in co-governance.Conclusion: The present study suggested citizens are likely to actively participate in food safety social co-governance only when they have at least one of the following three characteristics: (1) higher than average income in their city of residence; (2) a bachelor's degree or higher education; or (3) good health. Therefore, motivating citizens to participate in co-governance is a long-term process in China. The fundamental strategy is to increase the income of citizens, especially among low-income groups, promote education to improve the food safety literacy of the public, and improve sanitation and public health.

Psychological capital (PsyCap) motivates citizens to actively participate in social affairs. This study aims to promote the application of the PsyCap theory in the field of public affairs and help promote the establishment of a food safety social co-governance system in practice. Based on a questionnaire survey of 752 urban citizens in Wuxi, China, this study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to classify citizens into three different latent groups from the perspective of PsyCap and its four-dimensional composition. The influence of PsyCap and its various dimensions on the willingness of citizens in different groups to participate in food safety social co-governance was assessed and compared using usefulness analysis. Results showed that citizens showed obvious differences in their PsyCap, which can be divided into low, medium, and high levels. All dimensions of PsyCap had an impact on willingness to participate, but the impact differed among groups. The overall PsyCap level had a greater impact on citizens’ willingness to participate than any single dimension. In the future construction of a food safety social co-governance system, different guidance and intervention strategies should be implemented based on the differences in PsyCap among different groups.

ObjectiveThis study aims to identify all actors that hold some responsibility for ensuring food safety based on the complete food supply chain in the context of China's current circumstances.MethodsThe study was conducted among citizens in Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. All citizens fully understood the purpose of the study and voluntarily agreed to participate. From December 10 to 14, 2020, a total of 398 valid samples were collected by the researchers using a structured questionnaire. Survey data were assessed using best–worst scaling and a mixed logit model from the perspective of citizen responsibility.ResultsIn descending order, responsibility for ensuring food safety goes from food producers and traders (including producers, distributors, and retailers) to the government, social organizations, news media, and finally to citizens. Food producers and traders are the actors who should take the greatest responsibility, whereas citizens bear the least responsibility.ConclusionThe responsibility of citizens in food safety co-governance should be recognized but it should not be arbitrarily extended.