Membrane tethering is a highly regulated event occurring during the initial physical contact between membrane-bounded transport carriers and their target subcellular membrane compartments, thereby ensuring the spatiotemporal specificity of intracellular membrane trafficking. Although Rab-family small GTPases and specific Rab-interacting effectors, such as coiledcoil tethering proteins and multisubunit tethering complexes, are known to be involved in membrane tethering, how these protein components directly act upon the tethering event remains enigmatic. Here, using a chemically defined reconstitution system, we investigated the molecular basis of membrane tethering by comprehensively and quantitatively evaluating the intrinsic capacities of 10 representative human Rab-family proteins (Rab1a,-3a,-4a,-5a,-6a,-7a,-9a,-11a,-27a, and-33b) to physically tether two distinct membranes via homotypic and heterotypic Rab-Rab assembly. All of the Rabs tested, except Rab27a, specifically caused homotypic membrane tethering at physiologically relevant Rab densities on membrane surfaces (e.g. Rab/lipid molar ratios of 1:100-1:3,000). Notably, endosomal Rab5a retained its intrinsic potency to drive efficient homotypic tethering even at concentrations below the Rab/lipid ratio of 1:3,000. Comprehensive reconstitution experiments further uncovered that heterotypic combinations of human Rab-family isoforms, including Rab1a/6a, Rab1a/9a, and Rab1a/ 33b, can directly and selectively mediate membrane tethering. Rab1a and Rab9a in particular synergistically triggered very rapid and efficient membrane tethering reactions through their heterotypic trans-assembly on two opposing membranes. In conclusion, our findings establish that, in the physiological context, homotypic and heterotypic trans-assemblies of Rab-family small GTPases can provide the essential molecular machinery necessary to drive membrane tethering in eukaryotic endomembrane systems.

Membrane tethering is a highly regulated event occurring during the initial physical contact between membrane-bounded transport carriers and their target subcellular membrane compartments, thereby ensuring the spatiotemporal specificity of intracellular membrane trafficking. Although Rabfamily small GTPases and specific Rab-interacting effectors, such as coiled-coil tethering proteins and multisubunit tethering complexes, are known to be involved in membrane tethering, how these protein components directly act upon the tethering event remains enigmatic. Here, using a chemically defined reconstitution system, we investigated the molecular basis of membrane tethering by comprehensively and quantitatively evaluating the intrinsic capacities of 10 representative human Rabfamily proteins (Rab1a, -3a, -4a, -5a, -6a, -7a, -9a, -11a, -27a, and -33b) to physically tether two distinct membranes via homotypic and heterotypic Rab-Rab assembly. All of the Rabs tested, except Rab27a, specifically caused homotypic membrane tethering at physiologically relevant Rab densities on membrane surfaces (e.g., Rab-to-lipid molar ratios of 1:100-1:3000). Notably, endosomal Rab5a retained its intrinsic potency to drive efficient homotypic tethering even at concentrations below the Rab-tolipid ratio of 1:3000. Comprehensive reconstitution experiments further uncovered that heterotypic combinations of human Rab-family isoforms, including Rab1a/6a, Rab1a/9a, and Rab1a/33b, can directly and selectively mediate membrane tethering.Rab1a and Rab9a in particular synergistically triggered very rapid and efficient membrane tethering reactions through their heterotypic trans-assembly on two opposing membranes. In conclusion, our findings establish that, in the physiological context, homotypic and heterotypic trans-assemblies of Rab-family small GTPases can provide the essential molecular machinery necessary to drive membrane tethering in eukaryotic endomembrane systems.

The mechanism of emergence from primary dormancy, the process of after‐ripening, in cocklebur (Xanthium pennsylvanicum) seeds was examined in relation to the involvement of volatile compounds and to the relative humidity (RH) in which the seeds were stored. The after‐ripening of these seeds proceeds only at water contents between 7 and 14% which are conditioned under RHs of 33% to 53% and are identified with water‐binding region II. After‐ripening of cocklebur seeds occurred even in water‐binding region I. imposed by 12% RH. when exposed to HCN gas during the storage period. Exposure of dormant seeds to acetaldehyde (ethanal) retarded after‐ripening. even in water‐binding region II. thus decreasing germinability. This decrease of germinability by ethanal was found also in the after‐ripened seeds, suggesting that ethanal accelerates seed deterioration rather than retarding the after‐ripening. The contents of ethanal. ethanal and HCN were high only in the dormant seeds held at 12% RH. Regardless of RH. a possible conversion of ethanal to ethanol. perhaps via alcohol dehydrogenase. was far larger in dormant than in non‐dormant seeds. In contrast, the reverse conversion of ethanol to ethanal was more profound in non‐dormant seeds. Pre‐exposure of both types of seeds to HCN reduced the contents of both ethanal and ethanol at 12% RH. The contents of various adenylales including ATP in seed tissues were higher in dormant seeds stored at 12% RH than in non‐dormant seeds after‐ripened at 44% RH. It is suggested that emergence of cocklebur seeds from primary dormancy by HCN treatment at 12% RH may result from the reduction in the contents of ethanal via an unknown mechanism incurring the consumption of ATP. This implies involvement of volatile compound metabolism at the water‐binding region II in the after‐ripening process of cocklebur seeds.

No abstract