One-half of the total deaths in chronic dialysis patients are due to cardiovascular disease; however, the precise incidence and relative risk of those compared to normals are not known. Therefore, we sought to determine the annual incidence of cardiovascular disease and relative risk of those on chronic dialysis to the general population. Both the general population (1.2 million, Census 1990) and chronic dialysis patients (N = 1,609) in Okinawa, Japan were studied prospectively from April, 1988, to March, 1991. Diagnosis of stroke was made by symptoms and brain CT scan, and acute myocardial infarction was done by changes in electrocardiogram and serum enzymes. The relative risk (observed/expected ratio) was calculated by using the standardized morbidity rate obtained in both sexes and age-class every 10 years in the general population. Forty-one stroke (8 cerebral infarction, 31 cerebral hemorrhage, and 2 subarachnoid hemorrhage) and four acute myocardial infarction cases were registered during the study period in chronic dialysis patients. The incidence per 1,000 person-year was 11.5 in stroke, 2.2 in cerebral infarction, 8.7 in cerebral hemorrhage, 0.6 in subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1.1 in acute myocardial infarction. The relative risk compared to normals was 5.2 in stroke, 2.0 in cerebral infarction, 10.7 in cerebral hemorrhage, 4.0 in subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 2.1 in acute myocardial infarction. Cerebral hemorrhage occurred at 10 years younger than that of the general population (P < 0.001) and was associated with high prevalence of hypertension and low levels of serum albumin and cholesterol. Our results confirm the importance of blood pressure control and nutritional status in chronic dialysis patients.
BackgroundThe usefulness of sputum Gram stain in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is controversial. There has been no study to evaluate the diagnostic value of this method in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in etiological diagnosis and pathogen-targeted antibiotic treatment of CAP and HCAP.MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study on hospitalized patients with pneumonia admitted to our hospital from August 2010 to July 2012. Before administering antibiotics on admission, Gram stain was performed and examined by trained physicians immediately after sputum samples were obtained. We analyzed the quality of sputum samples and the diagnostic performance of Gram stain. We also compared pathogen-targeted antibiotic treatment guided by sputum Gram stain with empirical treatment.ResultsOf 670 patients with pneumonia, 328 were CAP and 342 were HCAP. Sputum samples were obtained from 591 patients, of these 478 samples were good quality. The sensitivity and specificity of sputum Gram stain were 62.5% and 91.5% for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 60.9% and 95.1% for Haemophilus influenzae, 68.2% and 96.1% for Moraxella catarrhalis, 39.5% and 98.2% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 22.2% and 99.8% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 9.1% and 100% for Staphylococcus aureus. The diagnostic yield decreased in patients who had received antibiotics or patients with suspected aspiration pneumonia. Pathogen-targeted treatment provided similar efficacy with a decrease in adverse events compared to empirical treatment.ConclusionsSputum Gram stain is highly specific for the etiologic diagnosis and useful in guiding pathogen-targeted antibiotic treatment of CAP and HCAP.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-534) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.