ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacious noninferiority of subcutaneous tocilizumab injection (TCZ-SC) monotherapy to intravenous TCZ infusion (TCZ-IV) monotherapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to synthetic and/or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).MethodsThis study had a double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy, comparative phase III design. Patients were randomized to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg every 2 weeks or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks; no DMARDs were allowed during the study. The primary end point was to evaluate the noninferiority of TCZ-SC to TCZ-IV regarding the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement in disease activity (ACR20) response rates at week 24 using an 18% noninferiority margin. Additional efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenicity parameters were assessed.ResultsAt week 24, ACR20 response was achieved in 79.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 72.9, 85.5) of the TCZ-SC group and in 88.5% (95% CI 83.4, 93.5) of the TCZ-IV group; the weighted difference was −9.4% (95% CI −17.6, −1.2), confirming the noninferiority of TCZ-SC to TCZ-IV. Remission rates of the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at week 24 were 49.7% and 16.4% in the TCZ-SC group and 62.2% and 23.1% in the TCZ-IV group, respectively. Serum trough TCZ concentrations were similar between the groups over time. Incidences of all adverse events and serious adverse events were 89.0% and 7.5% in the TCZ-SC group and 90.8% and 5.8% in the TCZ-IV group, respectively. Anti-TCZ antibodies were detected in 3.5% of the TCZ-SC group; no serious hypersensitivity was reported in these patients.ConclusionTCZ-SC monotherapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to TCZ-IV monotherapy. TCZ-SC could provide additional treatment options for patients with RA.

No abstract

Aim:To identify the incidence and risk factors for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with resolved HBV receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).Method: Rheumatoid arthritis patients in whom bDMARD therapy was initiated in our departments from April 2009 to July 2016 were reviewed. The patients diagnosed with resolved HBV and whose HBV-DNA levels had been repeatedly measured were enrolled. The endpoint was HBV reactivation (a positive conversion of HBV-DNA or unquantifiable cases with positivity <20 IU/mL). Nucleic acid analogues (NAAs) were administered when the HBV-DNA levels increased beyond 20 IU/mL. The associations between HBV reactivation and the clinical findings were retrospectively analyzed. Results:One hundred and fifty-two RA patients with resolved HBV were enrolled; 133 (88%) patients had antibodies against HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs). The medicines that were administered included: abatacept (n = 29), golimumab (n = 26), etanercept (n = 25), tocilizumab (n = 25), adalimumab (n = 19), infliximab (n = 17) and certolizumab pegol (n = 11). During the observation period (15 [interquartile range 4.0-34] months), 7 (4.6%) patients developed HBV reactivation. In 5 of these patients, the HBV-DNA levels became negative or remained at <20 IU/mL (+) without NAA therapy. HBV-DNA levels of >20 IU/mL were observed in 2 patients but the HBV-DNA levels became negative after NAA treatment. Patients who were negative for anti-HBs showed a significantly higher incidence of HBV reactivation (P = 0.013).Conclusion: HBV reactivation occurred in 4.6% of RA patients with resolved HBV during the treatment with bDMARDs and the absence of anti-HBs may be a risk factor for the reactivation of resolved HBV. K E Y W O R D Santibodies against HBV surface antigen, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, HBV reactivation, resolved HBV, rheumatoid arthritis

Acupuncture relieves symptom, remedies physical function, and improves quality of life in RA patients, but may have no or very limited anti-inflammatory effect systemically. The regional effects of acupuncture are unlikely to be induced through reduction of regional inflammation. We believe this clinical study is the first step for elucidating therapeutic mechanisms of acupuncture, which must be important for the rational use and further development of acupuncture.

Objective. To investigate the relationship between synovial vascularity and progression of structural bone damage in each finger joint in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to demonstrate synovial vascularity as a potential therapeutic marker. Methods. We studied 250 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and 250 proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of 25 patients with active RA who were administered adalimumab or tocilizumab. Patients were examined with clinical and laboratory assessments. Power Doppler sonography was performed at baseline and at the fourth and eighth weeks. Synovial vascularity was evaluated according to quantitative measurement. Hand and foot radiography was performed at baseline and the twentieth week. Results. Clinical indices such as the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, the Clinical Disease Activity Index, and the Simplified Disease Activity Index were significantly decreased by biologic agents. The MCP and PIP joints with no response in synovial vascularity between baseline and the eighth week (vascularity improvement of <70% at the eighth week) showed a higher risk of radiographic progression compared with responsive joints (vascularity improvement of >70% at the eighth week; relative risk 2.33-9). Radiographic progression at the twentieth week was significantly lower in responsive joints than in nonresponsive joints. Conclusion. The improvement of synovial vascularity following treatment with biologic agents led to suppression of radiographic progression of RA in each finger joint. The alteration in synovial vascularity numerically reflected therapeutic efficacy. Using vascularity as a marker to determine the most suitable therapeutic approach would be beneficial for patients with active RA.

Interobserver discrepancies in the image grading and QPD index methods were due more to the difference in the acquisition of the image than to the grading criteria used. The QPD index seems to be as reliable as the image grading scale with reasonable interobserver agreement between experienced sonographers.

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/, UMIN000007305.

No abstract