Background and Purpose-Enlimomab, a murine monoclonal anti-human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 antibody, had a negative outcome in a multicenter acute-stroke trial. We did a bedside-to-bench study in standardized rat stroke models to explore mechanisms for these untoward results. Methods-After focal brain ischemia in Wistar rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), we administered murine anti-rat ICAM-1 antibody (1A29), subclass-matched murine immunoglobulin (IgG1), or vehicle intravenously. To examine whether rat anti-mouse antibodies were generated against the mouse protein and whether these were deleterious, we sensitized Wistar rats with 1A29 or vehicle 7 days before surgery. Infarct volume, tissue myeloperoxidase activity, neutrophil CD11b expression, and microvascular E-selectin, P-selectin, and ICAM-1 expression were examined 48 hours after surgery. Complement activation was serially assessed for 2 hours after a single injection of either 1A29 or vehicle. Results-1A29 treatment did not significantly reduce infarct size in either strain. 1A29 sensitization augmented infarct size and generated rat anti-mouse antibodies. Although 1A29 inhibited neutrophil trafficking shown by reduction in brain myeloperoxidase activity, circulating neutrophils were activated and displayed CD11b upregulation. Complement was activated in 1A29-sensitized Wistar rats and 1A29-treated SHR. E-selectin (SHR), endothelial P-selectin (Wistar and SHR), and ICAM-1 (SHR) were upregulated in animals treated with 1A29. Conclusions-Administration to rats of a murine antibody preparation against ICAM-1, 1A29, elicits the production of host antibodies against the protein, activation of circulating neutrophils, complement activation, and sustained microvascular activation. These observations provide several possible mechanisms for central nervous system-related clinical deterioration that occurred when Enlimomab was given in acute ischemic stroke. (Stroke. 2001;32:2665-2674.)

A reproducible model of global cerebral ischemia in mice is essential for elucidating the molecular mechanism of ischemic neuronal injury. Such a model is particularly important in the mouse because many genetically engineered mutant animals are available. In C57BL/6 and SV129/EMS mice, we evaluated a three-vessel occlusion model. Occlusion of the basilar artery with a miniature clip was followed by bilateral carotid occlusion. The mean cortical cerebral blood flow was reduced to less than 10% of the preischemic value, and the mean anoxic depolarization was attained within 1 minute. In C57BL/6 mice, there was CA1 hippocampal neuronal degeneration 4 days after ischemia. Neuronal damage depended upon ischemic duration: the surviving neuronal count was 78.5 +/- 8.5% after 8-minute ischemia and 8.4 +/- 12.7% after 14-minute ischemia. In SV129/EMS mice, similar neuronal degeneration was not observed after 14-minute ischemia. The global ischemia model in C57BL/6 mice showed high reproducibility and consistent neuronal injury in the CA1 sector, indicating that comparison of ischemic outcome between wild-type and mutant mice could provide meaningful data using the C57BL/6 genetic background. Strain differences in this study highlight the need for consideration of genetic background when evaluating ischemia experiments in mice.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), administered 72 hours before middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, confers significant protection against ischemic injury. For example, in the present study, LPS (0.9 mg/kg intravenously) induced a 31% reduction in infarct volume (compared with saline control) assessed 24 hours after permanent MCA occlusion. To determine whether LPS induces true tolerance to ischemia, or merely attenuates initial ischemic severity by augmenting collateral blood flow, local CBF was measured autoradiographically 15 minutes after MCA occlusion. Local CBF did not differ significantly between LPS- and saline-pretreated rats (e.g., 34 +/- 10 and 29 +/- 15 mL x 100 g(-1) x min(-1) for saline and LPS pretreatment in a representative region of ischemic cortex), indicating that the neuroprotective action of LPS is not attributable to an immediate reduction in the degree of ischemia induced by MCA occlusion, and that LPS does indeed induce a state of ischemic tolerance. In contrast to the similarity of the initial ischemic insult between tolerant (LPS-pretreated) and nontolerant (saline-pretreated) rats, microvascular perfusion assessed either 4 hours or 24 hours after MCA occlusion was preserved at significantly higher levels in the LPS-pretreated rats than in controls. Furthermore, the regions of preserved perfusion in tolerant animals were associated with regions of tissue sparing. These results suggest that LPS-induced tolerance to focal ischemia is at least partly dependent on the active maintenance of microvascular patency and hence the prevention of secondary ischemic injury.