The 808G>T SNP in OCT2 ameliorated CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity without alteration of disposition, whereas the rs2289669 G>A SNP in MATE1 had no effect on CDDP toxicity.

An increase in the IS level and the associated disturbance to the circadian rhythm are involved in the renal and CNS toxicities in CDDP-treatment.

Cisplatin-induced AKI causes down-regulation of renal organic ion transporters accompanied by accumulation of serum and renal IS. IS could be involved in the mechanism of down-regulation of rOAT1, rOAT3 and rMATE1 under cisplatin-induced AKI.

Although gemcitabine is frequently used in the treatment of cancer, it is associated with myelosuppression. An animal study showed that the tolerability of gemcitabine varied with changes in treatment time; however, no clinical data have verified this finding. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between treatment time and development of hematologic toxicity in patients treated with gemcitabine. Gemcitabine-induced hematologic toxicity was retrospectively investigated in 77 patients. Patients were divided into two treatment-time groups: 9:00 and 15:00. Hematologic toxicity was evaluated on day 8 and 15 after treatment. On day 8 and 15, the changing count of white blood cells was significantly reduced in patients treated at 15:00 compared with those treated at 9:00 (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). On days 8 and 15, the changing count of platelet was significantly reduced in patients treated at 15:00 compared with those treated at 9:00 (p<0.05). The incident of over common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade 2 white blood cell decreased was significantly reduced in patients treated at 15:00 compared with those treated at 9:00 (p=0.048, odds ratio=2.92). In conclusion, this cohort study demonstrated that gemcitabine-induced hematologic toxicity could be alleviated by treating patients at 9:00.

: In this report, the authors described the unusual case of a patient in whom the plasma phenytoin concentration was unexpectedly not detected on a particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) technique, a typical immunoassay for phenytoin. The plasma concentration was measured using PETINIA and high-performance liquid chromatography in a 69-year-old male patient treated with fosphenytoin intravenously at the standard dose for 7 days. Although the plasma concentration of phenytoin was below the limit of detection (<0.5 mcg/mL) on PETINIA after the administration of fosphenytoin, the trough plasma concentration was estimated to be between 5 and 10 mg/L on high-performance liquid chromatography. When the plasma concentrations of IgM and IgG were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the plasma IgG level was within the reference range, whereas the plasma IgM level was 2-3 times higher than the upper limit of the reference range. We concluded that the PETINIA method yielded a possible false-negative result regarding the phenytoin level in this patient, perhaps because of some hindrance to the measurement process by IgM. This case suggests that false-negative results should be considered when therapeutic drug monitoring reveals abnormally low values using PETINIA and that it is necessary to evaluate the plasma IgM level.