Background: Few studies have investigated the complementary effects of long-term oral administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus on traditional medical therapy in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: The Atopic Dermatitis Area and Severity Index was used to evaluate AD severity. Symptom severity was assessed using the symptom score. The effect of medical therapy was evaluated by adding the medication score, calculated as the sum of each product of the amount of steroid ointment used for therapy and its designated strength graded on a 4-point scale, to the symptom score. The complementary effect of long-term oral administration of L. acidophilus strain L-92 (L-92) as a probiotic or biogenic strain in patients with AD was evaluated using the symptom-medication score, which was calculated as the sum of the symptom score and medication score. Both a preliminary casuistic study and a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study were performed to evaluate the effects of L-92 on the symptoms of AD in children. Results: Orally administered L-92 significantly ameliorated the symptoms of AD in Japanese children. L-92 also affected the serum concentrations of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine in a time-dependent manner.Conclusions: The results of the preliminary trial and the double-blinded, placebo-controlled study revealed a complementary effect of oral L-92 on the standard medical therapy (topical application of a steroid ointment) in patients with AD that was mediated, at least in part, by alterations in the Th1/Th2 balance.
Cross-allergenicity between five cereal grains including rice, wheat, corn, Japanese millet (Panicum crus-galli L. var. frumentaceum Trin.) and Italian millet (Setaria italica Beauv. var. germanica schrad.) was examined by radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and RAST inhibition assay. There were significant close correlations between every combinations of RAST values for the five cereal grain extracts. RAST inhibition assay of each extract against RAST discs coupled with other cereal grain extracts indicated marked cross-reactivity of IgE binding between these cereal grain extracts. Rice protein 16KD (RP16KD) was shown to be one of major allergens in rice grain extracts by immunoblotting analysis, histamine release assay from human leukocytes and RAST inhibition. Next, the involvement of RP16KD in the cross-allergenicity between these cereals was investigated. RAST values for RP16KD significantly correlated with that for Italian millet as well as rice but not with those for corn and wheat. There was a trend of positive correlation between RAST values for RP16KD and Japanese millet. In the RAST inhibition assay using sera with positive RAST for these five cereal grain extracts and RP16KD, RP16KD inhibited IgE binding to these all cereal discs in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, all of the five cereal grain extracts showed an effective decrease in IgE binding to the RP16KD disc. These results indicated possible participation of IgE binding structure on RP16KD in cross-allergenicity between these cereal grain extracts in the Poaceae family.
Lithium and magnesium salts of tetra(o-tolyl)diborane(4) dianion, having B = Bd ouble bond character, were synthesized. It was clarified that the lithium salt of the dianion has ah igh-lying HOMO and an arrowH OMO-LUMO gap,w hich were perturbed by dissociation of Li + cation, as judged by UV/Vis spectroscopya nd DFT calculations.The lithium salt of the dianion reacted as two equivalents of ad iarylboryl anion with CH 2 Cl 2 or S 8 to give borylsubstituted products.
Background: We frequently encounter subjects without overt symptoms despite high IgE antibodies to egg white and its components. The measurements of these antibodies are not necessarily efficient for the diagnosis or the prediction of the outcome of egg allergy in children. Methods: Specific IgE antibodies to egg white and its components, including ovomucoid, ovalbumin, ovotransferrin and lysozyme, were measured by direct RAST assays. IgE–binding activity to ovomucoid degraded by pepsin, trypsin and chymotrypsin was examined by RAST inhibition. Thirty subjects were divided into two groups with positive (n=18; mean age ± SD = 42 ±25 months) and negative (n=12; mean age ± SD = 48 ±31 months) oral challenge tests with egg white antigens. The individuals with positive results to the first challenge tests were given the second provocation tests at mean intervals of 32 months. IgE–binding activity of the sera collected on the first challenge to these ovomucoid fragments was compared between subjects with positive and negative reactions to the follow–up challenge tests. Results: There were no significant differences in IgE antibody titers to egg white and its components between the positive and negative groups at the first and the second challenge tests. IgE–binding activity to ovomucoid digests after treatments with pepsin (p = 0.000008) and trypsin (p=0.037), except chymotrypsin (p=0.062), were significantly higher in subjects with positive challenge tests than in those with negative results. The difference was most remarkable in the IgE–binding to pepsin digests; the average concentrations (mean – SD and mean + SD) needed for 50% RAST inhibition in the positive group and in the negative group were 2.6 μg/ml (0.3 and 25) and 94.2 μg/ml (24.7 and 358.7), respectively. A significant difference was still observed in the inhibition tests using filtrates of pepsin digests with a membrane with MW 10,000 (p=0.014) and 3,000 (p=0.042) of cutoff. The concentration (mean= 0.8, mean – SD=0.2, mean + SD=3.4; μg/ml) of pepsin–treated ovomucoid required for 50% RAST inhibition in the subjects with positive second challenge results was significantly (p=0.033) lower than that (mean=6.8, mean–SD=0.6, mean + SD=73.9) of the negative group. Conclusion: IgE–binding activity to pepsin–digested ovomucoid was of diagnostic value to distinguish the challenge–positive subjects from the negative subjects. Subjects with high IgE–binding activity to pepsin–treated ovomucoid are unlikely to outgrow egg white allergy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.