Context Impaired scapular kinematics are commonly reported in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Various therapeutic interventions designed to improve scapular kinematics and minimize pain and disability have been described in the literature. However, the short- and long-term benefits of these interventions are unclear. Objective To determine the effects of specific short- and long-term therapeutic interventions on scapular kinematics and disability in patients with SIS. Data Sources We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from their origins to January 2018 using a combination of the key words scapular kinematics AND (shoulder dysfunction OR subacromial impingement) and conducted a manual search by reviewing the references of the identified papers. Study Selection Studies were included if (1) preintervention and postintervention measures were available; (2) patient-reported outcomes were reported; (3) scapular kinematics measures at 90° of ascending limb elevation in the scapular plane were included; (4) SIS was diagnosed in participants or participants self-reported symptoms of SIS; (5) they were original clinical studies published in English; and (6) the sample sizes, means, and measure of variability for each group were reported. Data Extraction Seven studies were found. Sample sizes, means, and standard deviations of scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and internal rotation at 90° of ascending limb elevation on the scapular plane and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were extracted. Data Synthesis Standardized mean differences between preintervention and postintervention measures with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We observed that the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores improved (mean difference = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.54, 1.16) but did not observe changes in scapular upward rotation (mean difference = −0.04; 95% CI = −0.31, 0.22), posterior tilt (mean difference = −0.09; 95% CI = −0.32, 0.15), or internal rotation (mean difference = 0.06; 95% CI = −0.19, 0.31). Conclusions The short- and long-term therapeutic interventions for SIS improved patient-reported outcomes but not scapular kinematics. The identified improvements in shoulder pain and function were not likely explained by changes in scapular kinematics.
The purpose of this study was to compare neuromuscular function in the upper extremity musculature between individuals with glenohumeral labrum repair and uninjured controls. This cross‐sectional study examined 16 individuals with a primary, unilateral glenohumeral labral repair (male/female: 13/3, age: 24.1 ± 5.0 years, time from surgery: 36.7 ± 33.3 months) and 14 uninjured individuals (male/female: 11/3, age: 23.8 ± 2.7 years) matched by age, sex, activity level, and limb dominance participated. Mass‐normalized shoulder abduction and wrist flexion maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque, motoneuron pool excitability of the flexor carpi radialis (Hoffmann reflex), and corticospinal excitability of the upper trapezius, middle deltoid, and flexor carpi radialis (active motor threshold [AMT]) were evaluated. Dependent and independent t‐tests were used to assess between‐limb and between‐group comparisons. Cohen's d effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were used to quantify the magnitude of differences observed. Within the injured group, the involved limb had lesser shoulder abduction MVIC torque (p < 0.001, d = 1.16) and higher AMT for the upper trapezius (p = 0.01, d = 0.81) compared with the contralateral limb. The labral repair group had lesser shoulder abduction MVIC torque (p < 0.001, d = 1.17) and Hoffmann reflex (p = 0.01, d = 0.99), as well as higher AMT for the upper trapezius (p < 0.001, d = 1.23) in their involved limb compared with the control group. Large magnitude neuromuscular impairments are present beyond 6 months from glenohumeral labral repair, suggesting potential origins of impairments to be addressed during post‐operative rehabilitation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.