Purpose Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics. Results Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip). Conclusion There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination.

Purpose Extrusion of the medial meniscus evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been described as indirect radiological sign for meniscus root tears. However, ultrasound detectable dynamic extrusion is observed in normal physiological settings. The aim of the present study was to analyze the dynamic meniscal extrusion using ultrasound (US) examination in patients with MRI-conirmed meniscal root tears. The hypothesis was that dynamic meniscus extrusion is reduced in patients with medial root tear but not in the healthy meniscus. Methods Twenty-ive patients with a medial root lesion of the meniscus (group I) and 25 healthy controls (group II) were enrolled in this study. The medial meniscus extrusion (MME) of the index knee was determined using ultrasound (US) in supine position and under full weight bearing. Standard knee MRI was used for determining whether the patients were eligible for this study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, respectively. Results In group I, the mean MME was 3.6 mm (± 1.0 mm) in supine position and 3.7 mm (± 0.9 mm) under full weight bearing according to US measurements. The mean Δ-extrusion was 0.1 mm (± 0.2 mm) and the ratio was 1.0 (± 0.1). Mean medial meniscus extrusion on MRI was 3.9 mm (± 0.9 mm). In group II, mean MME was 1.3 mm (± 0.3 mm) in supine position (US) and 2.3 mm (± 0.4 mm) under full weight bearing (US). The mean Δ-extrusion was 1.0 mm (± 0.4 mm) and the extrusion ratio was 1.8 (± 0.4). In this group, mean extrusion in MRI was 1.4 mm (± 0.7 mm). The diference in mean ultrasound Δ-extrusion, ratio, and MRI extrusion between both groups was statistically signiicant (p < 0.001). Conclusions Based on the results of dynamic ultrasound examination of the medial meniscus, medial root tear leads to signiicantly decreased dynamic medial displacement of the meniscus compared to healthy meniscus status. The absence of dynamic meniscus extrusion may be an indicator for medial meniscus root injury and could be detected using ultrasound ("dead meniscus sign"). Level of evidence III.

No abstract

No abstract

I.

Husten 53 % Fieber 42 % Schnupfen 23 % Um die Ressourcen des Gesundheitssystems für die Behandlung von COVID-19-Patienten zu bündeln, wurde empfohlen, nicht dringliche Operationen zu verschieben oder zurückzustellen. In manchen Regionen wird die Durchführung planbarer Operationen sogar behördlich untersagt (Bayern bis 15.05.2020). In Berlin hingegen werden die Krankenhäuser Knie Journal Zusammenfassung · AbstractKnie J. https://doi.

Purpose Aim of this systematic review was to analyze long-term results after meniscus refixation. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on studies on long-term results after meniscus refixation with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Primary outcome criterion was the failure rate. Secondary outcome criteria were radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) and clinical scores. Results A total of 12 retrospective case series (level 4 evidence) were identified that reported about failure rates of more than 7 years follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the failure rates between open repair, arthroscopic inside-out with posterior incisions and arthroscopic all-inside repair with flexible non-resorbable implants. In long-term studies that examined meniscal repair in children and adolescents, failure rates were significantly higher than in studies that examined adults. Six studies have shown minor radiological degenerative changes that differ little from the opposite side. The reported clinical scores at follow-up were good to very good. Conclusion This systematic review demonstrates that good long-term outcomes can be obtained in patients after isolated meniscal repair and in combination with ACL reconstruction. With regard to the chondroprotective effect of meniscus repair, the long-term failure rate is acceptable. Level of evidence IV.

No abstract