The main outcome measures were employment status and return to work after TBI. Methodological quality of most of the relevant 12 controlled and 68 uncontrolled studies included in the review was estimated as very low. There was weak evidence that age, educational level, pre- and post-injury occupational status, severity of TBI, functional status, level of depression and anxiety, gender and race may be predictive for the vocational outcome after TBI. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: No strong evidence was found that vocational outcomes after TBI could be predicted or improved. There is a need for both experimental and observational well-conducted studies on this important subject. Researchers are strongly encouraged to use unified and standardized terms and scales in further studies. The authors suggest the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as the best tool available for this purpose.

There is limited evidence that surgery is not more effective in treating rotator cuff tear than conservative treatment alone. Thus, a conservative approach is advocated as the initial treatment modality. Implications for Rehabilitation There is limited evidence that surgery is not more effective in treating rotator cuff tear than conservative treatment alone. There was no clinically significant difference between surgery and active physiotherapy in 1-year follow-up in improving Constant score or reducing pain caused by rotator cuff tear. As physiotherapy is less proneness to complications and less expensive than surgery, a conservative approach is advocated as the initial treatment modality to rotator cuff tears.

Based on the review of seven RCTs, the evidence on effectiveness of surgical or conservative treatment of shoulder impingement was found to be limited. There was, however, moderate evidence that surgical treatment is not more effective than active exercises on reducing pain intensity caused by shoulder impingement. Implications for Rehabilitation Based on the review of seven RCTs, the evidence on effectiveness of surgical or conservative treatment of shoulder impingement was found to be limited. There was moderate evidence that surgical treatment is not more effective than active exercises on reducing pain intensity caused by shoulder impingement. Because of surgery's higher costs and susceptibility for complications compared with costs and risks of conservative treatment, conservative treatment can be recommended as a first choice of treatment of shoulder impingement in first or second grade.

Children with migraine experience more non-headache pains than children with episodic tension type headache and with no headache. However, neither children with migraine nor children with episodic tension type headache show increased interictal extracephalic muscular sensitivity for palpation.

Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability : systematic review

Current evidence on myofascial release therapy is not sufficient to warrant this treatment in chronic musculoskeletal pain.

ObjectivesTo investigate if there is evidence on effectiveness of progressive resistance training in rehabilitation of Parkinson disease.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Central, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, Pedro until May 2014. Randomised controlled or controlled clinical trials. The methodological quality of studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's domain-based evaluation framework. Data synthesis: random effects meta-analysis with test for heterogeneity using the I² and pooled estimate as the raw mean difference.ParticipantsAdults with primary/idiopathic Parkinson's disease of any severity, excluding other concurrent neurological condition.InterventionsProgressive resistance training defined as training consisting of a small number of repetitions until fatigue, allowing sufficient rest between exercises for recovery, and increasing the resistance as the ability to generate force improves.ComparisonProgressive resistance training versus no treatment, placebo or other treatment in randomised controlled or controlled clinical trials.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAny outcome.ResultsOf 516 records, 12 were considered relevant. Nine of them had low risk of bias. All studies were randomised controlled trials conducted on small samples with none or 1 month follow-up after the end of intervention. Of them, six were included in quantitative analysis. Pooled effect sizes of meta-analyses on fast and comfortable walking speed, the 6 min walking test, Timed Up and Go test and maximal oxygen consumption were below the level of minimal clinical significance.ConclusionsThere is so far no evidence on the superiority of progressive resistance training compared with other physical training to support the use of this technique in rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease.Systematic review registration numberPROSPERO 2014:CRD42014009844.

According to current evidence, hydrodilatation has only a small, clinically insignificant effect when treating adhesive capsulitis.