Using genome-wide expression profiling of a panel of 27 human mammary cell lines with different mechanisms of E-cadherin inactivation, we evaluated the relationship between E-cadherin status and gene expression levels. Expression profiles of cell lines with E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter methylation were significantly different from those with CDH1 expression or, surprisingly, those with CDH1 truncating mutations. Furthermore, we found no significant differentially expressed genes between cell lines with wild-type and mutated CDH1. The expression profile complied with the fibroblastic morphology of the cell lines with promoter methylation, suggestive of epithelial -mesenchymal transition (EMT). All other lines, also the cases with CDH1 mutations, had epithelial features. Three non-tumorigenic mammary cell lines derived from normal breast epithelium also showed CDH1 promoter methylation, a fibroblastic phenotype and expression profile. We suggest that CDH1 promoter methylation, but not mutational inactivation, is part of an entire programme, resulting in EMT and increased invasiveness in breast cancer. The molecular events that are part of this programme can be inferred from the differentially expressed genes and include genes from the TGFb pathway, transcription factors involved in CDH1 regulation (i.e. ZFHX1B, SNAI2, but not SNAI1, TWIST), annexins, AP1/2 transcription factors and members of the actin and intermediate filament cytoskeleton organisation.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL) is characterized by a marked degree of morphologic and clinical heterogeneity. We studied 156 patients with de novo DLCL for rearrangements of the BCL2, BCL6, and MYC oncogenes by Southern blot analysis and BCL2 protein expression. We related these data to the primary site of presentation, disease stage, and other clinical risk factors. Structural alterations of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC were detected in 25 of 156, 36 of 116, and 10 of 151 patients, respectively. Three cases showed a combination of BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements, and two cases had a combination of BCL6 and MYC rearrangements. BCL2 rearrangement was found more often in extensive (39%) and primary nodal (17%) lymphomas than in extranodal cases (4%) (P = .003). BCL2 rearrangement was present in none of 40 patients with stage I disease, but in 22% of patients with stage II to IV (P = .006). The presence of BCL2 rearrangements did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). In contrast, high BCL2 protein expression adversely affected both OS (P = .008) and DFS (P = .01). BCL2 protein expression was poorly correlated with BCL2 rearrangement: only 52% of BCL2-rearranged lymphomas and 37% of BCL2-unrearranged cases had high BCL2 protein expression. Rearrangement of BCL6 was found more often in patients with extranodal (36%) and extensive (39%) presentation versus primary nodal disease (28%). No significant correlation was found with disease stage, lymphadenopathy, or bone marrow involvement. DFS and OS were not influenced by BCL6 rearrangements. MYC rearrangements were found in 16% of primary extranodal lymphomas, versus 2% of primary nodal cases (P = .02). In particular, gastrointestinal (GI) lymphomas (5 of 18 cases, 28%) were affected by MYC rearrangements. The distinct biologic behavior of these extranodal lymphomas was reflected by a high complete remission (CR) rate: 7 of 10 patients with MYC rearrangement attained complete remission and 6 responders remained alive for more than 4 years, resulting in a trend for better DFS (P = .07). These data show the complex nature of molecular events in DLCL, which is a reflection of the morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of these lymphomas. However, thus far, these genetic rearrangements fail as prognostic markers. © 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.
Rearrangement of the BCL2 gene is an important parameter for the differential diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Although a relatively large proportion of breakpoints is clustered, many are missed by standard PCR. A FISH assay is therefore desired. Up to now, a lack of probes flanking the BCL2 gene has limited the possibilities for a FISH assay to an approach based on colocalization of probes for BCL2 and the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) locus. Intrinsically high rates of false positive nuclei and high interobserver variability make such assays unsuitable for use on lymphoma tissue samples, where tumor cells often form only a minority of the cell population. Using YAC end cloning techniques and screening of a PAC library, we have isolated PAC clones flanking the BCL2 gene. Using these PACs, and several cosmid clones in the second BCL2 intron, we developed a segregation-based interphase FISH assay with two probe combinations enabling separate detection of 5' and 3' (mbr/mcr) breakpoints. The assay was applied to a series of 40 follicular lymphomas. To evaluate the results, the same lymphomas were analyzed by DNA fiber FISH with a 600-kb set of BCL2 DNA clones labeled in alternating colors in combination with a color barcode covering the IGH locus. This approach allowed precise mapping of BCL2 breakpoints, and simultaneously showed juxtaposition of IGH genes to BCL2. Comparison of the results of interphase and fiber FISH showed complete correlation. Five cases were negative with both FISH techniques as well as with Southern blotting. Interestingly, all of these 5 cases lacked BCL2 overexpression as determined by immunohistochemistry, against 3 of 35 rearrangement-positive follicular lymphomas. Furthermore, absence of t(14;18) seemed to be correlated with a higher histologic grade (grades 2 and 3 according to Berard). These data indicate that the segregation-based interphase FISH assay detects 100% of BCL2 rearrangements. Because interpretation of the results is straightforward and requires no extensive experience, this assay may be the best available diagnostic test for BCL2 rearrangement. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:85-94, 2000.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL) is characterized by a marked degree of morphologic and clinical heterogeneity. We studied 156 patients with de novo DLCL for rearrangements of the BCL2, BCL6, and MYC oncogenes by Southern blot analysis and BCL2 protein expression. We related these data to the primary site of presentation, disease stage, and other clinical risk factors. Structural alterations of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC were detected in 25 of 156, 36 of 116, and 10 of 151 patients, respectively. Three cases showed a combination of BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements, and two cases had a combination of BCL6 and MYC rearrangements. BCL2 rearrangement was found more often in extensive (39%) and primary nodal (17%) lymphomas than in extranodal cases (4%) (P = .003). BCL2 rearrangement was present in none of 40 patients with stage I disease, but in 22% of patients with stage II to IV (P = .006). The presence of BCL2 rearrangements did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). In contrast, high BCL2 protein expression adversely affected both OS (P = .008) and DFS (P = .01). BCL2 protein expression was poorly correlated with BCL2 rearrangement: only 52% of BCL2-rearranged lymphomas and 37% of BCL2-unrearranged cases had high BCL2 protein expression. Rearrangement of BCL6 was found more often in patients with extranodal (36%) and extensive (39%) presentation versus primary nodal disease (28%). No significant correlation was found with disease stage, lymphadenopathy, or bone marrow involvement. DFS and OS were not influenced by BCL6 rearrangements. MYC rearrangements were found in 16% of primary extranodal lymphomas, versus 2% of primary nodal cases (P = .02). In particular, gastrointestinal (GI) lymphomas (5 of 18 cases, 28%) were affected by MYC rearrangements. The distinct biologic behavior of these extranodal lymphomas was reflected by a high complete remission (CR) rate: 7 of 10 patients with MYC rearrangement attained complete remission and 6 responders remained alive for more than 4 years, resulting in a trend for better DFS (P = .07). These data show the complex nature of molecular events in DLCL, which is a reflection of the morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of these lymphomas. However, thus far, these genetic rearrangements fail as prognostic markers. © 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.
In B-cell lymphomas, loss of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II molecules might contribute to immune escape from CD8+ and CD4+ cytotoxic T cells, especially because B cells can present their own idiotype. Loss of HLA expression and the possible underlying genomic alterations were studied in 28 testicular, 11 central nervous system, and 21 nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLCLs), the first two sites are considered as immune-privileged sites. The analysis included immunohistochemistry, loss of heterozygosity analysis, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase cells and isolated DNA fibers. Total loss of HLA-A expression was found in 60% of the extranodal cases and in 10% of the nodal cases (P < .01), whereas loss of HLA-DR expression was found in 56% and 5%, respectively (P < .01). This was accompanied by extensive loss of heterozygosity within the HLA region in the extranodal DLCLs. In 3 cases, retention of heterozygosity for D6S1666 in the class II region suggested a homozygous deletion. This finding was confirmed by interphase FISH that showed homozygous deletions in the class II genes in 11 of the 18 extranodal lymphomas but in none of the 7 nodal DLCLs (P < .001). Mapping by fiber FISH showed variable deletions that always included HLA-DQ and HLA-DR genes. Hemizygous deletions and mitotic recombinations often involving all HLA genes were found in 13 of 18 extranodal and 2 of 7 nodal lymphomas. In conclusion, a structural loss of HLA class I and II expression might help the B-cell lymphoma cells to escape from immune attack.
In B-cell lymphomas, loss of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II molecules might contribute to immune escape from CD8+ and CD4+ cytotoxic T cells, especially because B cells can present their own idiotype. Loss of HLA expression and the possible underlying genomic alterations were studied in 28 testicular, 11 central nervous system, and 21 nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLCLs), the first two sites are considered as immune-privileged sites. The analysis included immunohistochemistry, loss of heterozygosity analysis, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase cells and isolated DNA fibers. Total loss of HLA-A expression was found in 60% of the extranodal cases and in 10% of the nodal cases (P < .01), whereas loss of HLA-DR expression was found in 56% and 5%, respectively (P < .01). This was accompanied by extensive loss of heterozygosity within the HLA region in the extranodal DLCLs. In 3 cases, retention of heterozygosity for D6S1666 in the class II region suggested a homozygous deletion. This finding was confirmed by interphase FISH that showed homozygous deletions in the class II genes in 11 of the 18 extranodal lymphomas but in none of the 7 nodal DLCLs (P < .001). Mapping by fiber FISH showed variable deletions that always included HLA-DQ and HLA-DR genes. Hemizygous deletions and mitotic recombinations often involving all HLA genes were found in 13 of 18 extranodal and 2 of 7 nodal lymphomas. In conclusion, a structural loss of HLA class I and II expression might help the B-cell lymphoma cells to escape from immune attack.
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the long arm of chromosome 16 is a frequent genetic alteration in breast cancer. It can occur by physical loss of part of or the entire chromosomal arm, resulting in a decrease in copy number or loss followed by mitotic recombination. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) demonstrated that well-differentiated breast tumors showed significantly more physical loss of 16q than did poorly differentiated ones and that this difference was already discernable in the preinvasive stage. However, polymorphic markers detected no difference in the frequency of 16q LOH between invasive tumors of different histological grade. Here, by combining data on LOH (n=52), fluorescence in situ hybridization (n=18) with chromosome 16-specific probes, and CGH (n=34), we show a preference in well-differentiated grade I tumors for physical loss of chromosome arm 16q, whereas in poorly differentiated grade III tumors LOH is accompanied by mitotic recombination. This clarifies the discrepancies observed between CGH and LOH for 16q in breast cancer. These different somatic genetic mechanisms may reflect the presence of multiple tumor suppressor genes that are the target of LOH at chromosome arm 16q.
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a major mechanism for inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes and has been observed in various solid tumors and lymphomas. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region is located at chromosome band 6p21.3, and loss or alteration of this region may provide tumor cells with a mechanism to escape from the immune system. We previously identified small homozygous deletions within the HLA class II region in many of the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLCLs) of the central nervous system (CNS) and the testis. In the present study, we focused on the mechanism leading to LOH in the HLA region. Twenty microsatellite markers, of which 12 were specific for HLA, were applied on 11 extranodal DLCLs of the CNS and 28 of the testis. Additionally, fluorescence in situ hybridization with seven HLA-specific probes and a centromere 6-specific probe was performed on 20 cases to study the mechanism of LOH. In contrast to previously published data on spontaneously mutated lymphoblastoid cell lines, intrachromosomal hemizygous deletion, not mitotic recombination, was the major cause of LOH of the HLA region in these lymphomas. However, opposed to data in colorectal cancer, these deletions were rarely (one of nine cases) associated with an interchromosomal rearrangement such as a translocation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.