Administration of immune effector cell (IEC) therapy is a complex endeavor requiring extensive coordination and communication of various healthcare and administrative teams. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are the most established IEC therapy available. As of July 2018 two commercial gene therapy products, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. To gain insight into the infrastructure and practices across the country, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group conducted an electronic survey on the current administrative, logistic, and toxicity management practices of CAR T cell therapy across the United States. This survey consists of 52 responses from institutions of varying sizes, most of which (»80%) had previous investigational experience with CAR T cell therapy. Absorbing the energy of this exciting new treatment has challenged hematopoietic cell transplant programs across the country to strengthen department infrastructure, develop new committees and policies, and implement significant education to ensure safe administration. With the variety of experience with CAR T cell therapy, we hope this survey can contribute to the existing published literature and provide support and consensus to established and developing IEC programs and practice guidelines.

For patients with high risk myeloid disease, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy. Unfortunately, many of these patients relapse after HCT and have a limited survival. The recent approval of venetoclax, an orally bioavailable BCL‐2 inhibitor, resulted in significant responses in treatment naïve acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and off‐label use in the relapsed/refractory setting is increasing. We report the outcomes of 21 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT for myeloid disease, relapsed with AML, and were treated with venetoclax. Several patients had poor risk features including antecedent hematologic malignancy (6/21), complex karyotype (6/21), and TP53 mutations (5/21). The median age was 64.5 years and time from HCT to relapse was 5.7 months (range: 0.9 to 44.9 months). Of the 19 patients who were assessed for response, there were meaningful treatment responses seen in eight patients: five CR, three CRi, zero PR, for an ORR of 42.1%. Treatment effect was seen in six additional patients, including four in the morphologic leukemia‐free state. Nine patients maintained their response for ≥3 months and eight were receiving therapy at data cut. Post‐HCT AML relapse has an exceedingly poor outcome, and venetoclax‐based therapy is a potent therapy option that should be studied prospectively in this setting.

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) has been associated with inferior outcomes compared with de novo AML. Little is known about patient risk factors and outcomes in sAML after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT); thus, this large systemic analysis of the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation registry was performed. This study included 4997 patients with sAML who received HCT from 2000 to 2016. In univariate analysis the 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 33.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 34.9%), 33.7% (95% CI, 32.3% to 35.1%), and 27.5% (95% CI, 26.1% to 28.7%), respectively. Overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 2 years were 44.5% (95% CI, 43% to 46%), 38.8% (95% CI, 37.4% to 40.3%), and 27.2% (95% CI, 25.9% to 28.6%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving myeloablative regimens had decreased relapse (hazard ratio, .859; 95% CI, .761 to .97; P = .01), higher NRM (hazard ratio, 1.175; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.341; P = .02), and no differences in OS, LFS, and GRFS compared with patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Active disease, adverse cytogenetics, older age, Karnofsky performance status (≤80%), ex vivo T cell depletion, other malignant hematologic diseases, and patient cytomegalovirus seropositivity were associated with inferior OS and LFS. These variables should be considered in patients with sAML in need of HCT, and further study regarding the impact of conditioning regimens on relapse is needed.

Key Points• Allogeneic HCT can result in long-term survival for patients with sAML and prior MDS/MPN.• Myeloablative conditioning regimens should be selected for sAML and patients with prior MDS/MPN whenever possible.Patients with secondary AML (sAML) with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) tend to have high-risk disease based on the older age of patients, high-risk cytogenetics, and higher number of prior treatments. was given to 40% of patients, and 60% received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC).Overall, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was 37%, leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 40%, overall survival (OS) was 46%, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 23%, and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 39%. In univariate analysis, a statistical difference between conditioning regimens 6 months after HCT in favor of the MAC group was noted with regard to RI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; P 5 .03), LFS (HR, 1.43; P 5 .01), and OS (HR, 1.55; P , .05). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of NRM (HR, 1.38; P 5 .15). This effect was similarly seen in multivariate analysis (MVA):cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 1.79; P , .05), LFS (HR, 1.43; P 5 .02), and OS (HR, 1.53; P 5 .005) with no difference in NRM (HR, 1; P 5 .98). This EBMT ALWP analysis suggests that long-term survival can be achieved in patients with sAML with antecedent MDS/MPN and that MAC is a suitable conditioning regimen in patients with sAML.

Available evidence suggests that outpatient oncology practices may benefit from integrating pharmacists into care models in order to more effectively, efficiently, and holistically address the needs of patients with cancer.