Members of the PI3K/Akt/mTor signaling cascade are among the most frequently altered proteins in cancer, yet the therapeutic application of pharmacological inhibitors of this signaling network, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy (CT) has so far not been particularly successful. In this review we will focus on the role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR in two distinct tumors, Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), an adult brain tumor which frequently exhibits PTEN inactivation, and Neuroblastoma (NB), a childhood malignancy that affects the central nervous system and does not harbor any classic alterations in PI3K/Akt signaling. We will argue that inhibitors of PI3K/Akt signaling can be components for potentially promising new CTs in both tumor entities, but further understanding of the signal cascade’s complexity is essential for successful implementation of these CTs. Importantly, failure to do this might lead to severe adverse effects, such as treatment failure and enhanced therapy resistance.
The induction of apoptosis, a physiological type of cell death, is currently the primary therapeutic aim of most cancer therapies. As resistance to apoptosis is an early hallmark of developing cancer, the success of this treatment strategy is already potentially compromised at treatment initiation. In this review, we discuss the tumor in Darwinian terms and describe it as a complex, yet highly unstable, ecosystem. Current therapeutic strategies often focus on directly killing the dominant subclone within the population of mutated cancer cells while ignoring the subclonal complexity within the ecosystem tumor, the complexity of the direct tumor/ microenvironment interaction and the contribution of the ecosystem human - that is, the global environment which provides the tumor with both support and challenges. The Darwinian view opens new possible therapeutic interventions, such as the disruption of the microenvironment by targeting nonmutated cells within the tumor or the interaction points of mutant tumor cells with their environment, and it forces us to reevaluate therapeutic endpoints. It is our belief that a central future challenge of apoptosis-inducing therapies will be to understand better under which preconditions which treatment strategy and which therapeutic endpoint will lead to the highest quality and quantity of a patient's life.
Cancers in animals present a large, underutilized reservoir of biomedical information with critical implication for human oncology and medicine in general. Discussing two distinct areas of tumour biology in non-human hosts, we highlight the importance of these findings for our current understanding of cancer, before proposing a coordinated strategy to harvest biomedical information from non-human resources and translate it into a clinical setting.
First, infectious cancers that can be transmitted as allografts between individual hosts, have been identified in four distinct, unrelated groups, dogs, Tasmanian devils, Syrian hamsters and, surprisingly, marine bivalves. These malignancies might hold the key to improving our understanding of the interaction between tumour cell and immune system and, thus, allow us to devise novel treatment strategies that enhance anti-cancer immunosurveillance, as well as suggesting more effective organ and stem cell transplantation strategies. The existence of these malignancies also highlights the need for increased scrutiny when considering the existence of infectious cancers in humans.
Second, it has long been understood that no linear relationship exists between the number of cells within an organism and the cancer incidence rate. To resolve what is known as Peto's Paradox, additional anticancer strategies within different species have to be postulated. These naturally occurring idiosyncrasies to avoid carcinogenesis represent novel potential therapeutic strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.