Escherichia coli tRNA pseudouridine 55 synthase catalyzes pseudouridine formation at U55 in tRNA. A 17 base oligoribonucleotide analog of the T-arm was equivalent to intact native tRNA as a substrate for pseudouridine 55 synthase, viz., the features for substrate recognition by this enzyme are completely contained within the T-arm. The structures and activities of mutant tRNAs and T-arms were used to analyze substrate recognition by pseudouridine 55 synthase. The 17-mer T-arm was an excellent substrate for the synthase, while disruption of the stem structure of the 17-mer T-arm eliminated activity. Kinetic data on tRNA mutants lacking single T-stem base pairs indicated that only the 53:61 base pair, which maintains the 7 base loop size, was essential for activity. The identities of individual bases in the stem were unimportant provided base pairing was intact. A major function of the T-stem appears to be the maintainence of a stable stem-loop structure and proper presentation of the T-loop to pseudouridine 55 synthase. The 7 base T-loop could be expanded or contracted by 1 base and still retain activity, albeit with a 30-fold reduction in kcat. Kinetic analysis of T-loop mutants revealed the requirement for U54, U55, and A58, and a preference for C over U at position 56. Base substitutions at loop nonconserved position 59 or semiconserved positions 57 or 60 were well tolerated. Comparison of pseudouridine 55 synthase and tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase revealed that both enzymes required the stem-loop structure. However, pseudouridine 55 synthase was not stringent for a 7 base loop and recognized a consensus base sequence within the T-loop, while tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase recognized the secondary structure of the 7 member T-loop with only a specific requirement for U54, the T-loop substrate site. We conclude that recognition of tRNA by pseudouridine 55 synthase resides in the conformation of the T-arm plus four specific bases of the loop.

Protozoa contain thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) on the same polypeptide. In the bifunctional protein, the DHFR domain is on the amino terminus, TS is on the carboxyl terminus, and the two domains are separated by a junction peptide of varying size depending on the source. The native protein is composed of a dimer of two such subunits and is 110-140 kDa. Most studies of the bifunctional TS-DHFR have been performed with the protein from anti-folate resistant strains of Leishmania major, which show amplification of the TS-DHFR gene and overproduction of the bifunctional protein. The Leishmania TS-DHFR has also been highly expressed in heterologous systems. There appears to be extensive communication among domains and channeling of the H2folate product of TS to DHFR. Anti-folates commonly used to treat microbial infections are poor inhibitors of L. major DHFR. However, selective inhibition of L. major vs. human DHFR does not appear difficult to achieve, and selective inhibitors are known. The TS-DHFR from Plasmodium falciparum has also been cloned and has recently been expressed in Escherichia coli, albeit in small amounts. Interestingly, pyrimethamine-resistant strains of P. falciparum all have a common point mutation in the DHFR coding sequence (Thr/Ser 108 to Asn), which causes decreased binding of the folate analog. It is suggested that if an appropriate inhibitor of the pyrimethamine-resistant P. falciparum DHFRs can be found, it may serve in combination with pyrimethamine as an antimalarial regimen with low propensity for the development of resistance. In the future, we project that we will have a detailed knowledge of the structure and function of TS-DHFRs, and have the essential tools necessary for a molecular-based approach to drug design.

Thymidylate synthase (TS), 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate (FdUMP), and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2-H4folate) form a covalent complex in which a Cys thiol of TS is attached to the 6-position of FdUMP and the one-carbon unit of the cofactor is attached to the 5-position. The kinetics of formation of this covalent complex have been determined at several temperatures by semirapid quench methods. Together with previously reported data the results permit calculation of every rate and equilibrium constant in the interaction. Conversion of the noncovalent ternary complex to the corresponding covalent complex proceeds at a rate of 0.6 s-1 at 25 degrees C, and the dissociation constant for loss of CH2-H4folate from the noncovalent ternary complex is approximately 1 microM. Activation parameters for the formation of the covalent complex were shown to be Ea = 20 kcal/mol, delta G+ = 17.9 kcal/mol, delta H+ = 19.3 kcal/mol, and delta S+ = 0.005 kcal/(mol.deg). The equilibrium constant between the noncovalent and covalent ternary complexes is approximately 2 X 10(4), and the overall dissociation constant of CH2-H4folate from the covalent complex is approximately 10(-11) M. The conversion of the noncovalent ternary complex to the covalent adduct is about 12-fold slower than kcat in the normal enzymic reaction. However, because the dissociation constant for CH2-H4folate from the noncovalent ternary complex is about 10-fold lower than that from the TS-dUMP-CH2-H4folate Michaelis complex, the terms corresponding to kcat/Km are nearly equal. We propose that some of the intrinsic binding energy of CH2-H4folate may be used to facilitate formation of a 5-iminium ion intermediate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase (RUMT) catalyzes the methylation of U54 of tRNAs. In contrast to enzymes which recognize a particular tRNA, RUMT recognizes features common to all tRNAs. We have shown that these features reside in the T-arm of tRNA and constructed a minimal consensus sequence for RUMT recognition and catalysis (Gu et al., 1991b). Here, we have mutated each conserved T-loop residue and conserved T-stem base pair to bases or base pairs which are not observed in Escherichia coli tRNA. The substrate specificity of RUMT for 30 in vitro synthesized T-arm mutants of tRNAPhe and 37 mutants of the 17-mer analog of the T-arm derived from tRNA1Val was investigated. A 2-5 base pair stem was essential for recognition of the T-arm by RUMT, but the base composition of the stem was unimportant. The 7-base size of the T-loop maintained by the stem was essential for RUMT recognition. For tRNA, most base substitutions in the 7-base loop did not eliminate RUMT activity, except for any mutation of the methyl acceptor U54 and the C56G mutation. The effect of base and base pair mutations on Kcat or the rate of methylation by RUMT was more striking than the effect on the Kd for binding to RUMT. In comparison with mutations in the T-loop of intact tRNA, base mutation in the T-loop of the 17-mer T-arm had a more deleterious effect on binding and methylation. Surprisingly, recognition of tRNA by RUMT appears to reside in the three-dimensional structure of the seven-member T-loop rather than in its primary structure.