Although the largest minority population in the United States, Hispanics are under-represented in hospice at the national level. The study purpose was to document Hispanic access to hospice services in an environment where Hispanics are a majority population. The framework for the study was Aday and Anderson's model for access to medical care. In this framework, access is not defined as availability of services and resources, but whether services are actually used by the people who need them. We completed retrospective chart reviews of 500 Medicare beneficiaries who died in four hospices. Study variables were decedent characteristics and access to hospice and hospice disciplines. Results showed that Hispanics and whites differed on characteristics known to influence access to health services, e.g., preferred language and type of caregiver Although the proportion of Hispanic elders dying in hospice was less than the proportion living in the community, the proportions of Hispanic elders who died in the community or died in their homes were not differentfrom the proportion that died in hospice. When access to hospice disciplines was compared between Hispanic and white decendents, the results showed one difference-more whites than Hispanics had access to volunteer services. Overall, the study showed that Hispanics were not underrepresented in hospice, and they had equal access to hospice disciplines. These findings differ from national data and may be associated with Hispanics being the majority population in the community. To learn how population dominance influences minority access to services, Hispanic access to hospice could be studied in locales with varying proportions of Hispanics in the population.
Problem
The University of Houston College of Medicine (UH COM) began its first admissions cycle after receiving preliminary accreditation in February 2020. With the advent of remote learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the school moved its admissions process, including multiple mini-interview (MMI), from an in-person to online format in mid-March 2020.
Approach
The UH COM selected Zoom as the video conferencing platform for its virtual admissions process, including MMI. On each interview day (3–4 hours), 14–16 applicants joined administrators, faculty, and staff in a virtual meeting room. Applicants were divided into 2 groups: one viewed short presentations about the school, curriculum, and departments, while the other participated in 7 MMI stations (one-on-one interactions with interviewers) via virtual breakout rooms; the groups then switched. The MMI stations were the same as those used in-person in early March. Applicants were able to ask questions at multiple points during the day. Technical support was provided for participants with connectivity issues or unfamiliar with Zoom.
Outcomes
Of the 180 applicants interviewed in March–April 2020, 134 (74%) participated in the virtual process and 46 (26%) in the on-site process. Twenty-five (83%) of the 30 members of the inaugural class of 2024 interviewed virtually. Advantages of the virtual format included ease of access for faculty and more flexibility and less expense for applicants. Challenges included the need for applicants to decide whether to accept an offer of admission from a new school without visiting and missed opportunities for faculty to have relatively unstructured interactions with applicants.
Next Steps
This virtual admissions process was a feasible alternative for the inaugural class but is not sustainable. UH COM plans to leverage lessons learned to refine the virtual format for use in future admissions cycles, even when in-person interviews are possible.
While more women graduate from medical school, there is still unequal representation of women in academic medicine, especially in the senior levels of academia. Gender bias is a strong reason women leave academic medicine. Disparities in salary and promotion, conscious and unconscious bias and institutional policies create a culture that does not favor their recruitment and retention. This article reviews literature that describes the problem and potential solutions to individuals, departments and institutions.
Generally, satisfaction with timing of hospice referral was measured in mortality follow back surveys of patients who died in hospice. In contrast in this study, investigators assessed timing of the hospice referral in patients/families enrolled in hospice for a minimum of two weeks. About 1/3 of patients/ families identified it would have been easier if they started hospice earlier. Barriers to early hospice access were associated primarily with access to the healthcare system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.