No abstract

Background: Life expectancy, as well as the average age of patients undergoing solid organ transplantation, increases constantly. Consequently, immunosuppressive therapy is no longer limited to young organ recipients. Objective: Here, we investigate how different types of immunosuppressive therapy, namely the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A and tacrolimus, as well as the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, affect the function of immune cells in young and elderly persons. Methods: Proliferation, cell viability, cytokine production (IL-2, IFN-γ), H₂O₂ production and telomere length of phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of young (n = 13; median age 27 years) and old (n = 19; median age 71 years) healthy donors were analyzed. Results: The inhibition of proliferation was dampened in PBMCs from elderly donors, especially after incubation with rapamycin. All three immunosuppressive drugs inhibited the production of IL-2 equally well, whereas the production of IFN-γ was less well inhibited by rapamycin. Both calcineurin inhibitors increased H₂O₂ concentrations after stimulation with PHA and led to a shortening of telomeres in PBMCs from young and old individuals. Rapamycin had only minor effects on H₂O₂ production and telomere length. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the effects of immunosuppressive drugs on PBMCs differ between young and elderly persons. Calcineurin inhibitors compared to rapamycin have a more pronounced prosenescence effect. These data indicate that specific treatment regimens for the elderly might therefore be considered.

SummaryThe average age of patients receiving renal transplantation is increasing as programmes have been established which support the donation of organs from elderly donors to older recipients. Little is known about the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on the immune system of older patients. In this study, T cell function and the composition of the T cell repertoire were analysed in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients of different age and cytomegalovirus (CMV) status in comparison to age-and CMV-matched controls. Independent of age and CMV status, the production of interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ by T cells was decreased in the patient groups and autologous serum from patients was capable of inhibiting the proliferation of CD3 + T cells. CXCR5 expression on T cells was increased in patients versus controls reflecting reduced endogenous IL-2 signalling under immunosuppressive therapy. In CMV-seronegative patients kidney transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy did not induce changes in the CD8+ T cell pool, but there was a moderate increase in CD4 + CD28 − effector T cells when compared to age-matched controls. In contrast, latent CMV infection triggered a shift from early to late differentiated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in patients and controls. This shift was most pronounced in elderly transplant patients under immunosuppressive therapy. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that immunosuppressive therapy following kidney transplantation is effective in patients older than 65 years. Latent CMV infection, however, accelerates age-related changes in the T cell repertoire in elderly people under immunosuppressive therapy. These patients should therefore be monitored with special care.