Monocytes are heterogeneous cells consisting of (at least) three subsets: classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocytes. Correct enumeration of cell counts necessitates well-defined gating strategies, which are essentially based upon CD14 and CD16 expression. For the delineation of intermediate from nonclassical monocytes, a "rectangular gating (RG) strategy" and a "trapezoid gating (TG) strategy" have been proposed. We compared the two gating strategies in a well-defined clinical cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Within the ongoing CARE FOR HOMe study, monocyte subsets were reanalyzed in 416 CKD patients, who were followed 3.6 6 1.6 years for the occurrence of a cardiovascular event. Gating was performed by either RG or TG. We analyzed the expression of surface markers, and compared the predictive role of cell counts of monocyte subsets, as defined by RG and TG, respectively. With both gating strategies, higher intermediate monocyte counts predicted the cardiovascular endpoint in Kaplan-Meier analyses (P < 0.001 with RG; P < 0. Key terms cd14; cd16; monocytes; gating strategy; cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease MONOCYTE heterogeneity was first described in 1989 based on the differential expression of the lipopolysaccharide coreceptor CD14 and the FccRIII receptor CD16 (1). Initially two monocyte subpopulations have been distinguished by flowcytometry: a population, which expresses high levels of CD14 and no CD16, and a population which coexpresses both markers (CD161 monocytes).Subsequent research characterized CD161 monocytes as proinflammatory cells, as they were found to express high levels of TNFa and IL12p40/IL12p70 (2,3) and as their cell counts were found to be elevated in many inflammatory conditions [reviewed in (4,5)].

CVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD profoundly affects HDL composition and functionality, but whether abnormal HDL independently contributes to cardiovascular events in CKD patients remains elusive. In the present study, we assessed whether compositional and functional properties of HDL predict cardiovascular outcome among 526 nondialysis CKD patients who participate in the CARE FOR HOMe study. We measured HDL cholesterol, the content of HDL-associated proinflammatory serum amyloid A (SAA), and activities of the HDL enzymes paraoxonase and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2). In addition, we assessed the antioxidative activity of apoB-depleted serum. During a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.1 years, 153 patients reached the predefined primary endpoint, a composite of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events including cardiovascular mortality and death of any cause. In univariate Cox regression analyses, lower HDL-cholesterol levels, higher HDL-associated SAA content, and lower paraoxonase activity predicted cardiovascular outcome, while Lp-PLA2 activity and antioxidative capacity did not. HDL-cholesterol and HDL-paraoxonase activity lost their association with cardiovascular outcome after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular and renal risk factors, while SAA lost its association after further adjustment for C-reactive protein. In conclusion, our data suggest that neither HDL quantity nor HDL composition or function independently predict cardiovascular outcome among nondialysis CKD patients.

Background and objectives Progression of CKD toward ESRD is heterogeneous. The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) was developed to identify CKD patients at high risk of ESRD. We aimed to externally validate KFRE and to test whether the addition of predefined Duplex ultrasound markers -renal resistive index (RRI) or difference of resistive indices in spleen and kidney (DI-RISK) -improved ESRD prediction.Design, setting, participants, & measurements The prospective Cardiovascular and Renal Outcome in CKD 2-4 Patients-The Fourth Homburg evaluation (CARE FOR HOMe) study recruits CKD stage G2-G4 patients referred to a tertiary referral center for nephrologic care. Four hundred three CARE FOR HOMe participants enrolled between 2008 and 2012 had available RRI measurements at study inclusion; they were subsequently followed for a mean of 4.461.6 years. This subcohort was used to validate KFRE and to assess the added value of the ultrasound markers (new models KFRE+RRI and KFRE+DI-RISK). Model performance was assessed by log-likelihood ratio test, c-statistic, integrated discrimination improvement metrics (for study participants without subsequent ESRD [IDI No ESRD ] and for patients with ESRD [IDI ESRD ]), and calibration plots. If either new model improved on KFRE, we determined to validate it in an independent cohort of 162 CKD patients.Results KFRE predicted ESRD in CARE FOR HOMe participants with a c-statistic of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.99). Adding RRI improved the KFRE model (P,0.001), and the KFRE+RRI model was well calibrated; however, the c-statistic (0.91 [0.83-1.00]) was similar, and overall sensitivity (IDI No ESRD =0.05 [0.00-0.10]) or overall specificity (IDI ESRD =0.00 [0.00-0.01]) did not improve. Adding DI-RISK did not improve the KRFE model. In the external validation cohort, we confirmed that the KFRE+RRI model did not outperform KFRE.Conclusions Routine Duplex examinations among CKD patients did not improve risk prediction for progression to ESRD beyond a validated equation.

Our data confirm NT-proBNP is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with CKD. The additional use of echocardiography for improvement of risk stratification is not supported by our results.

In line with experimental studies, high natriuretic peptides may inhibit neprilysin activity in CKD. Therefore, high neprilysin activity and concentrations are not predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcome in CKD patients. Thus neprilysin inhibitors should be implemented with caution in patients with advanced CKD.