Purpose: To report BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) variant reassessments and reclassifications between 2012 and 2017 at the Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (AMDL) in Toronto, Canada, which provides BRCA1/2 testing for patients in Ontario, and to compare AMDL variant classifications with submissions in ClinVar. Methods: Variants were assessed using a standardized variant assessment tool based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology's guidelines and tracked in an in-house database. Variants were shared through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository and submitted to ClinVar for comparison against other laboratories. Results: AMDL identified 1209 BRCA1/2 variants between 2012 and 2017. During this period, 32.9% (398/1209) of variants were reassessed and 12.4% (150/1209) were reclassified. The majority of reclassified variants were downgraded (112/150, 74.7%). Of the reclassified variants, 63.3% (95/150) were reclassified to benign, 20.7% (31/150) to likely benign, 10.0% (15/150) to variant of uncertain significance, 2.0% (3/150) to likely pathogenic, and 4.0% (6/150) to pathogenic. Discordant ClinVar submissions were found for 40.4% (488/1209) of variants. Conclusion: BRCA1/2 variants may be reclassified over time. Reclassification presents ethical and practical challenges related to recontacting patients. Data sharing is essential to improve variant interpretation, to help patients receive appropriate care based on their genetic results.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a national program for Canadian diagnostic laboratories to compare DNA-variant interpretations and resolve discordant-variant classifications using the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a case study.MethodsBRCA1 and BRCA2 variant data were uploaded and shared through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR; http://www.opengenetics.ca). A total of 5,554 variant observations were submitted; classification differences were identified and comparison reports were sent to participating laboratories. Each site had the opportunity to reclassify variants. The data were analyzed before and after the comparison report process to track concordant- or discordant-variant classifications by three different models.ResultsVariant-discordance rates varied by classification model: 38.9% of variants were discordant when using a five-tier model, 26.7% with a three-tier model, and 5.0% with a two-tier model. After the comparison report process, the proportion of discordant variants dropped to 30.7% with the five-tier model, to 14.2% with the three-tier model, and to 0.9% using the two-tier model.ConclusionWe present a Canadian interinstitutional quality improvement program for DNA-variant interpretations. Sharing of variant knowledge by clinical diagnostic laboratories will allow clinicians and patients to make more informed decisions and lead to better patient outcomes.

BackgroundExome and genome sequencing have been demonstrated to increase diagnostic yield in paediatric populations, improving treatment options and providing risk information for relatives. There are limited studies examining the clinical utility of these tests in adults, who currently have limited access to this technology.MethodsPatients from adult and cancer genetics clinics across Toronto, Ontario, Canada were recruited into a prospective cohort study evaluating the diagnostic utility of exome and genome sequencing in adults. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and suspected of having a hereditary disorder but had received previous uninformative genetic test results. In total, we examined the diagnostic utility of exome and genome sequencing in 47 probands and 34 of their relatives who consented to participate and underwent exome or genome sequencing.ResultsOverall, 17% (8/47) of probands had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified in a gene associated with their primary indication for testing. The diagnostic yield for patients with a cancer history was similar to the yield for patients with a non-cancer history (4/18 (22%) vs 4/29 (14%)). An additional 24 probands (51%) had an inconclusive result. Secondary findings were identified in 10 patients (21%); three had medically actionable results.ConclusionsThis study lends evidence to the diagnostic utility of exome or genome sequencing in an undiagnosed adult population. The significant increase in diagnostic yield warrants the use of this technology. The identification and communication of secondary findings may provide added value when using this testing modality as a first-line test.

No abstract

IntroductionGenomic sequencing has rapidly transitioned into clinical practice, improving diagnosis and treatment options for patients with hereditary disorders. However, large-scale implementation of genomic sequencing faces challenges, especially with regard to the return of incidental results, which refer to genetic variants uncovered during testing that are unrelated to the primary disease under investigation, but of potential clinical significance. High-quality evidence evaluating health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results is critical for the adoption of genomic sequencing into clinical care and to understand the unintended consequences of adoption of genomic sequencing. We aim to evaluate the health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results for patients undergoing genomic sequencing.Methods and analysisWe will compare health outcomes and costs of receiving, versus not receiving, incidental results for adult patients with cancer undergoing genomic sequencing in a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. Two hundred and sixty patients who have previously undergone first or second-tier genetic testing for cancer and received uninformative results will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto, Ontario. Participants in both arms will receive cancer-related results. Participants in the intervention arm have the option to receive incidental results. Our primary outcome is psychological distress at 2 weeks following return of results. Secondary outcomes include behavioural consequences, clinical and personal utility assessed over the 12 months after results are returned and health service use and costs at 12 months and 5 years. A subset of participants and providers will complete qualitative interviews about utility of incidental results.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System that provides ethical review and oversight for multiple sites participating in the same clinical trial in Ontario.Results from the trial will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences, and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03597165.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the undergraduate degree awarded to the author Ian Halim, which was incorrectly given as BS. This has now been corrected to BA in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

BackgroundThere is a critical need for collaborative measures between Canadian institutions to better facilitate variant analysis and data sharing.ObjectivesThe Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR) is a collaborative effort for the collection, sharing and analysis of variants reported by medical diagnostics laboratories across Canada. The project focuses on reaching consensus agreements on variant classification among clinical laboratories through data sharing and analysis and disseminating such information to a large, public data repository.Design/methodCOGR provides laboratories a custom Variant Assessment Tool, and facilitates sharing through GeneInsight®, a database capturing variant interpretations, reference sequence data, and gene-disease associations. Agreements and discrepancies for individual variant interpretations were identified, and a voting system was put in place to attempt to reach consensus on discrepant classifications.ResultsThe COGR network currently contains over 3,000 variants across 23 genes associated with 10 diseases. There are 46 variants seen by at least three laboratories with fully consistent classifications. A total of 96 variants had discrepant classifications across at least two laboratories. When targeting the 5 most discrepant variants for review via a presentation and anonymous voting, only 1 variant reached consensus.ConclusionsBy sharing data among laboratories, consensus classifications could quickly be reached for a subset of variants. However, despite presenting evidence for variant classification and discussions amongst experts in the field, there is still considerable difficulty reaching consensus for ambiguous variants. This highlights the need for structured and rule-based variant review. The COGR is facilitating collaboration between Canadian laboratories and international efforts through data sharing and consensus building.

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Sydrome (HBOC) accounts for approximately 5-10% of breast and ovarian cancer cases and germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer substantially increased risk. However, the risk of developing cancer, the type of cancer and the associated age at diagnosis vary depending on the type of mutation carried and the individual's ethnic background and gender. Screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was conducted on 5, 512 high-risk individuals with a prior probability of carrying a pathogenic mutation (>10% chance) from the Advanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (AMDL) (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto). Information on age, type of cancer diagnosed and age at diagnosis, ethnicity and family history were collected. Cumulative incidence competing risk and Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression analyses were generated to determine factors associated with earlier diagnosis of cancer. Among 5,029 women and 480 men who underwent testing, a total of 845 unique variants were identified of which, 289 (34.2%) are pathogenic. There were 603 female mutation carriers, of these, 303 were affected with breast or ovarian cancer (50%), 16 with another cancer (2.25%) and 284 were unaffected (47.1%). We also identified 20 different ethnic groups presenting with at least 3 unique variants. Six ethnic groups carried at least one variant associated with an earlier diagnosis of cancer and differential breast or ovarian cancer incidence. For instance, among the Ashkenazi Jewish cohort, the c.68_69del variant was associated with significantly earlier age at diagnosis for ovarian cancer incidence (Gray's test = 40.6; Fine-Gray HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 – 1.31). By screening a diverse cohort of high-risk individuals for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, we identified pathogenic variants associated with an earlier age of diagnosis and differential incidence of breast or ovarian cancer among unique ethnic groups. Citation Format: Andrew H. Girgis, Marina Wang, Alexa Fine Kathleen-Rose ZakoorSam Khalouei, George Charames, Jordan Lerner-Ellis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation spectrum across 5, 509 high-risk individuals identifies pathogenic variants associated with ethnicity, age of diagnosis, and type of cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research; Oct 17-20, 2015; Bellevue, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2016;14(2_Suppl):Abstract nr A34.