C hronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a complication of acute pulmonary emboli with uncertain prevalence, ranging from 0.57% to 9.1%. 1The diagnosis is strongly associated with a history of acute venous thromboembolism.2 CTEPH results from incomplete Editorial, see p 1731 Clinical Perspective on p 1771resolution of pulmonary emboli that become organized into vessel walls and cause different degrees of obstruction to Background-Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension results from incomplete resolution of pulmonary emboli.Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is potentially curative, but residual pulmonary hypertension following surgery is common and its impact on long-term outcome is poorly understood. We wanted to identify factors correlated with poor long-term outcome after surgery and specifically define clinically relevant residual pulmonary hypertension post-PEA. Methods and Results-Eight hundred eighty consecutive patients (mean age, 57 years) underwent PEA for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Patients routinely underwent detailed reassessment with right heart catheterization and noninvasive testing at 3 to 6 months and annually thereafter with discharge if they were clinically stable at 3 to 5 years and did not require pulmonary vasodilator therapy. Cox regressions were used for survival (time-toevent) analyses. Overall survival was 86%, 84%, 79%, and 72% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years for the whole cohort and 91% and 90% at 1 and 3 years for the recent half of the cohort. The majority of patient deaths after the perioperative period were not attributable to right ventricular failure (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension). At reassessment, a mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥30 mm Hg correlated with the initiation of pulmonary vasodilator therapy post-PEA. A mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥38 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥425 dynes·s -1 ·cm -5 at reassessment correlated with worse long-term survival. Conclusions-Our data confirm excellent long-term survival and maintenance of good functional status post-PEA.Hemodynamic assessment 3 to 6 months and 12 months post-PEA allows stratification of patients at higher risk of dying of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and identifies a level of residual pulmonary hypertension that may guide the long-term management of patients postsurgery. 4 It is recognized that there is a steep surgical and institutional learning curve at the start of a PEA program, but, in experienced centers, the operative mortality rate is <5%.5-7 A number of reports have confirmed improved short-term outcome in terms of hemodynamics, right ventricular function, quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity after surgery. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Fewer reports describe long-term outcome post-PEA, and those that have been published are mainly retrospective and either only had small numbers of patients [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or limited information of factors correlated with long-term outco...

No abstract

and population density (interdecile OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.32-1.51]) or poverty rate (interdecile OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 0.97-4.25]). Neighborhood-level variables were moderately to highly correlated (r = 0.66-0.83). Discussion | In this study, SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pregnant women in New York City was associated with neighborhood-and building-level markers of large household membership, household crowding, and low socioeconomic status. These data may aid policy makers in the design of interventions to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2. A key strength of this study was the use of a universally tested population, which allowed for ascertainment of asymptomatic cases among a defined at-risk population. Limitations of the study include that the findings may not apply to other populations given the unique demographic, physiologic, and social features of pregnant women. Additionally, the small sample size and high degree of correlation between neighborhood-level variables precluded multivariable analysis. Nonetheless, this study provides empirical support for the hypothesis that variation in the urban environment may be an important social determinant of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Health inequities have long defined health and the healthcare system in the USA. The clinical and research capacity across the USA is unparalleled, yet compared to other high and even some middle-income countries, the average health indicators of the population remain suboptimal in 2020, a finding at least in part explained by inequity in healthcare access. In this context, COVID-19 has rapidly emerged as a major threat to the public’s health. While it was initially thought that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 would be the great equaliser as it would not discriminate, it is clear that COVID-19 incidence and mortality have rapidly reinforced health disparities drawn by historical and contemporary inequities. Here, we synthesise the data highlighting specific risks among particular marginalised and under-resourced communities including those in jails, prisons and detention centers, immigrants and the undocumented, people with disabilities and people experiencing homelessness across the USA. The drivers of these disparities are pervasive structural risks including limited access to preventive services, inability to comply with physical distancing recommendations, underlying health disparities and intersecting stigmas particularly affecting racial and ethnic minorities across the country, including African Americans, Latinx Americans and Native Americans. Advancing the COVID-19 response, saving lives and restarting the economy necessitate rapidly addressing these inequities rather than ignoring and even reinforcing them.

Compared with a 9-month isoniazid regimen, a 4-month rifampin regimen was associated with a higher percentage of patients completing treatment and a lower percentage of patients with clinically recognized adverse reactions. Additional studies are warranted to determine efficacy and effectiveness of rifampin therapy for LTBI.

No abstract

HIV/AIDS disproportionately affects Hispanics. Our objective was to determine the risk of late diagnosis and rate of survival after HIV/AIDS diagnosis among Hispanics compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We performed a systematic review of the PubMed database for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2000 and September 2010. Primary outcomes included survival after HIV/AIDS diagnosis and delayed diagnoses. The definition of delayed diagnosis varied by study, ranging from concurrent HIV/AIDS diagnosis to diagnosis of AIDS within 3 years of HIV diagnosis. We found that Hispanics are at significantly greater risk for delayed diagnosis than non-Hispanic whites. Hispanic males and foreign-born Hispanics had the highest risk of late diagnosis. Available data on survival were heterogeneous, with better outcomes in some Hispanic subgroups than in others. Survival after antiretroviral initiation was similar between Hispanics and Whites. These findings emphasize the need for culturally-sensitive strategies to promote timely diagnosis of HIV infection among Hispanics and to examine the health out-comes and needs of high risk Hispanic subgroups.

No abstract