Immunohistochemistry remains the current ancillary method of choice in the pathologic evaluation of small blue round-cell tumors. In at least 20% of cases of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), it is considered an essential factor in the final and/or differential diagnosis of the malignancy. Newer immunostains (antimyogenin, MyoD1) generated against intranuclear myogenic transcription factors offer pathologists the best hope for improving the sensitivity and specificity of RMS diagnosis. A large series of RMS (956) were studied consecutively from the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study and children's oncology group files, along with multiple other malignant, benign or reactive lesions. A panel of antibodies to muscle-related antigens (myogenin, MyoD1, desmin, muscle-specific actin) was studied using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, an avidin-biotin/peroxidase complex immunohistochemical technique, antigen retrieval technique as appropriate, and automated immunostaining. Myogenin and MyoD1 were equally sensitive (positive for 97% of RMS cases), with both also showing similar specificity (90% vs. 91% of cases) for the diagnosis of RMS. Myogenin and MyoD1 staining were sometimes intact in areas of coagulative tumor necrosis, but negated by B5 fixation. Isolated, rare benign myogenin-positive nuclei were seen infrequently in reactive lymph nodes. Specifically, both myogenin and MyoD1 had significantly greater extent of expression for alveolar RMS (ARMS) than embryonal RMS (ERMS) (both with P < 0.001). Similarly, both myogenin (P = 0.001) and MyoD1 (P < 0.001) had significantly higher expression for ARMS than RMS, not otherwise specified (NOS). They were never expressed in undifferentiated sarcomas; however, reactive or regenerative myocytes did show expression. Immunostains against intranuclear myogenic transcription factors are, at present, the best available markers for confirming the diagnosis of RMS. Their differential expression in reactive myogenic lesions, variability in ARMS versus ERMS, and absence in undifferentiated sarcomas suggest new biologic questions to be explored in future studies.
Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is common in critically ill, postsurgical, and posttrauma patients in whom both systemic inflammation and immune suppression are associated with adverse outcomes. RBC products contain a multitude of immunomodulatory mediators that interact with and alter immune cell function. These interactions can lead to both proinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Defining clinical outcomes related to immunomodulatory effects of RBCs in transfused patients remains a challenge, likely due to complex interactions between individual blood product characteristics and patient-specific risk factors. Unpacking these complexities requires an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of immunomodulatory effects of RBC products. In this review, we outline and classify potential mediators of RBC transfusion-related immunomodulation and provide suggestions for future research directions.
Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is difficult to define and likely represents a complicated set of physiologic responses to transfusion, including both proinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Similarly, the immunologic response to critical illness in both adults and children is highly complex and is characterized by both acute inflammation and acquired immune suppression. How transfusion may contribute to or perpetuate these phenotypes in the ICU is poorly understood, despite the fact that transfusion is common in critically ill patients. Both hyperinflammation and severe immune suppression are associated with poor outcomes from critical illness, underscoring the need to understand potential immunologic consequences of blood product transfusion. In this review we outline the dynamic immunologic response to critical illness, provide clinical evidence in support of immunomodulatory effects of blood product transfusion, review preclinical and translational studies to date of TRIM, and provide insight into future research directions.
MAPK phosphatase (MKP)-1 is an archetypal member of the dual specificity protein phosphatase family that dephosphorylates MAPK. We have previously demonstrated that MKP-1 acts as a negative regulator of p38 and JNK in immortalized macrophages after stimulation with peptidoglycan isolated from Gram-positive bacteria. To define the physiological function of MKP-1 during Gram-positive bacterial infection, we studied the innate immune responses to Gram-positive bacteria using Mkp-1 knockout (KO) mice. We found that Mkp-1−/− macrophages exhibited prolonged activation of p38 and JNK, but not of ERK, following exposure to either peptidoglycan or lipoteichoic acid. Compared with wild-type (WT) macrophages, Mkp-1−/− macrophages produced more proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. Moreover, after challenge with peptidoglycan, lipoteichoic acid, live or heat-killed Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, Mkp-1 KO mice also mounted a more robust production of cytokines and chemokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and MIP-1α, than did WT mice. Accordingly, Mkp-1 KO mice also exhibited greater NO production, more robust neutrophil infiltration, and more severe organ damage than did WT mice. Surprisingly, WT and Mkp-1 KO mice exhibited no significant difference in either bacterial load or survival rates when infected with live S. aureus. However, in response to challenge with heat-killed S. aureus, Mkp-1 KO mice exhibited a substantially higher mortality rate compared with WT mice. Our studies indicate that MKP-1 plays a critical role in the inflammatory response to Gram-positive bacterial infection. MKP-1 serves to limit the inflammatory reaction by inactivating JNK and p38, thus preventing multiorgan failure caused by exaggerated inflammatory responses.
Background Critical injury has been associated with reduction in innate immune function in adults, with infection risk being related to degree of immune suppression. This relationship has not been reported in critically injured children. Hypothesis Innate immune function will be reduced in critically injured children, and the degree of reduction will predict the subsequent development of nosocomial infection. Materials and Methods Children (≤ 18 years of age) were enrolled in this longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center study after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) following critical injury, along with a cohort of outpatient controls. Serial blood sampling was performed to evaluate plasma cytokine levels and innate immune function as measured by ex vivo LPS-induced TNFα production capacity. Results Seventy-six critically injured children (and 21 outpatient controls) were enrolled. Sixteen critically injured subjects developed nosocomial infection. Those subjects had higher plasma IL-6 and IL-10 levels on post-trauma day (PTD) 1–2 compared to those who recovered without infection and outpatient controls. Ex vivo LPS-induced TNFα production capacity was lower in children on PTD 1–2 (p=0.006) and over the first week following injury (p=0.04) in those who went on to develop infection. A TNFα response of < 520 pg/ml at any time in the first week after injury was highly associated with infection risk by univariate and multivariate analysis. Among transfused children, longer red blood cell storage age, not transfusion volume, was associated with lower innate immune function (p < 0.0001). Trauma-induced innate immune suppression was reversible ex vivo via co-culture of whole blood with GM-CSF. Conclusions Trauma-induced innate immune suppression is common in critically injured children and is associated with increased risks for the development of nosocomial infection. Potential exacerbating factors, including red blood cell transfusion, and potential therapies for pediatric trauma-induced innate immune suppression are deserving of further study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.