Genotyping provided a more accurate antigen status than phenotyping patient RBCs. Patients requiring long-term transfusion support benefit from antigen matching when matching less than four antigens. Ultimately, the decision to genotype or use thiol-treated RRC antibody investigations will vary for each hospital blood bank.

The U antigen (MNS5) is one of 49 antigens belonging to the MNS blood group system (ISBT002) carried on glycophorins A (GPA) and B (GPB). U is present on the red blood cells in almost all Europeans and Asians but absent in approximately 1.0% of Black Africans. U negativity coincides with negativity for S (MNS3) and s (MNS4) on GPB, thus be called S-s-U-, and is thought to arise from homozygous deletion of GYPB. Little is known about the molecular background of these deletions. Bioinformatic analysis of the 1000 Genomes Project data revealed several candidate regions with apparent deletions in GYPB. Highly specific Gap-PCRs, only resulting in positive amplification from DNAs with deletions present, allowed for the exact genetic localization of 3 different breakpoints; 110.24-and 103.26-kb deletions were proven to be the most frequent in Black Americans and Africans. Among 157 CEPH DNAs, deletions in 6 out of 8 African ethnicities were present. Allele frequencies of the deletions within African ethnicities varied greatly and reached a cumulative 23.3% among the Mbuti Pygmy people from the Congo. Similar observations were made for U+ var alleles, known to cause strongly reduced GPB expression. The 110-and 103-kb deletional GYPB haplotypes were found to represent the most prevalent hereditary factors causative of the MNS blood group phenotype S-s-U-. Respective GYPB deletions are now accessible by molecular detection of homo-and hemizygous transmission.

BACKGROUND The clinical and laboratory features of hemolytic disease of the newborn can be challenging to diagnose during pregnancy in the apparent absence of a blood group antibody. Low‐frequency antibodies go undetected due to the lack of appropriate antigen‐positive reagent red blood cells (RBCs). CASE REPORT A pregnant woman of Southeast Asian descent was referred to a maternal‐fetal medicine outpatient clinic due to a complicated obstetric history and a negative antibody screen. This initial visit at 29 weeks and 0 days’ gestational age (GA) was unremarkable. A hydropic infant, born at 29 weeks and 5 days’ GA, succumbed on the seventh day of life. Comprehensive laboratory testing was performed after birth. The hospital blood bank performed a maternal antibody identification. Direct antiglobulin test was performed on the cord blood. A reference laboratory confirmed an anti‐Mia, performed paternal Mia phenotyping, and identified a hybrid glycophorin B‐A‐B GP*Mur allele. DISCUSSION Maternal alloimmunization to low‐frequency antigens remains a challenge. Southeast Asians make up a significant percentage in some US locations. Worldwide reports on the frequency of maternal alloimmunization of the MNS system can be used to guide the use of specific reagent RBCs for testing. Such strategies rely on the identification of blood donor units for reagent manufacture and use in perinatal antibody screens. CONCLUSION The incidence of Mia and related antibodies is significant among Southeast Asians. In North America, prenatal antibody screening cells are not routinely chosen to match this population. The clinical and societal implications are discussed.

Extended blood group genotyping is an invaluable tool used for prevention of alloimmunization. Genotyping is particularly suitable when antigens are weak, specific antisera are unavailable, or accurate phenotyping is problematic because of a disease state or recent transfusions. In addition, genotyping facilitates establishment of mass-scale patient-matched donor databases. However, standardization of genotyping technologies has been hindered by the lack of reference panels. A wellcharacterized renewable reference panel for standardization of blood group genotyping was developed. The panel consists of genomic DNA lyophilized and stored in glass vials. Genomic DNA was extracted in bulk from immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines, generated by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood lymphocytes harvested from volunteer blood donors. The panel was validated by an international collaborative study involving 28 laboratories that tested each DNA panel member for 41 polymorphisms associated with 17 blood group systems. Overall, analysis of genotyping results showed >98% agreement with the expected outcomes, demonstrating suitability of the material for use as reference. Highest levels of discordance were observed for the genes CR1, CD55, BSG, and RHD. Although limited, observed inconsistencies and procedural limitations reinforce the importance of reference reagents to standardize and harmonize results. Results of stability and accelerated degradation studies support the suitability of this panel for use as reference reagent for blood group genotyping assay development and standardization.

A serologic weak D is commonly defined as weak (21) or no reactivity of red blood cells with an anti-D reagent in initial testing but moderate to stronger reactivity with anti-human globulin at the indirect antiglobulin phase of testing. 1 We report three new weak D type alleles and provide haplotype information on weak D Types 1.2 and 18 alleles.We report three new RHD alleles that meet the definition of weak D types on the basis of the routine serologic profile and position of the amino acid changes. 2,3 In addition, we confirm and add information on weak D Types 1.2 and 18.