Background and Objectives: It is estimated that over 200,000 adults experience in-hospital cardiac arrest each year. Overall survival to discharge has remained relatively unchanged for decades and survival rates remain at about 20% (Elenbach et al., 2009). Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) is an in-hospital quality improvement program designed to improve adherence to evidence-based care of patients who experience an in-hospital resuscitation event. GWTG-R focuses on four achievement measures. The measures for adult patients include time to first chest compression of less than or equal to one minute, device confirmation of correct endotracheal tube placement, patients with pulseless VF/VT as the initial documented rhythm with a time to first shock of less than or equal to two minutes, and events in which patients were monitored or witnessed at the time of cardiac arrest. The objective of this abstract is to examine the association between hospital adherence to GWTG-R and in-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates. Methods: A retrospective review of adult in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) patients (n=1849) from 21 Michigan, Illinois, and Indiana hospitals using the GWTG-R database was conducted from January 2014 through December 2014. This study included adult CPA patients that did and did not survive to discharge. Results: The review found that hospitals that had attained 84.6% or higher thresholds in all four achievement measures for at least one year, which is award recognition status, had a significantly improved in-hospital CPA survival to discharge rate of 29.6%. Hospitals that did not obtain award status had a CPA survival to discharge rate of 24.3%. The national survival rate for in-hospital adult CPA survival to discharge is 20%. Hospitals that did not achieve award recognition status still demonstrated improvement in survival rate when compared to the national survival rate, indicating the importance of a quality improvement program such as GWTG-R. No significant difference was found between in-hospital adult CPA survival rate and race between GWTG-R award winning and non-award winning hospitals. Hospitals that earned award recognition from GWTG-R had a survival to discharge rate of 30.2% for African Americans and 29.6% for whites. Hospitals that were did not earn award recognition from GWTG-R had a survival to discharge rate of 20.0% for African Americans and 20.1% for whites. Conclusions: Survival of in-hospital adult CPA patients improved significantly when GWTG-R measures are adhered to. Survival of in-hospital adult CPA patients also improves with implementation of GWTG-R. It is crucial that hospitals collect and analyze data regarding resuscitation processes and outcomes. Quality improvement measures can then be implemented in order to assist with improving in-hospital CPA survival rates.
Partnerships between public health organizations and private corporations may be best positioned to address many of the major healthcare challenges currently facing nations across the globe. Strategically chosen partners can collaborate and share resources to develop and successfully implement valuable solutions to achieve common goals. The key is using innovation methods to effectively leverage the best resources provided by each partner. The authors explain the value of public-private partnerships while also providing insight into how specific tactics from projects undertaken by their international communications firm, Fleishman-Hillard, assisted partnerships in their efforts to develop innovative solutions to address healthcare challenges.
Accountability in campus ministry is the major theme of this issue which contains 10 articles and highlights contributions made by the Lilly Endowment and the Danforth Foundation. The articles cover the role of the ministry from the 1960's to the present time, stressing new trends in evaluative criteria, organization, and structures for social activism. The authors are remesentative of the maior Christian and Jewish faiths.-Director of Religious P r o g r a k , Ball State University.
Title: Prehospital Transport Protocol for Comprehensive Stroke Center Triage is Associated with Reduced Last Known Well to Arrival Times for Intracranial Hemorrhage Background: In September 2018, we implemented a prehospital routing protocol for patients with suspected severe stroke and large vessel occlusion using the 3 Item Stroke Scale (3I-SS). Patients who have a 3I-SS score of ≥4 and have a known last normal time of ≤6 hours were transported to the closest Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC). While the impact on endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke is more established, the effect of this transport policy on patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. Objective/Methods: The objective of the study was to determine if implementation of a regional CSC transport protocol reduced last known well (LKW) to hospital arrival time for patients with ICH. Data was retrospectively reviewed all patients with a primary diagnosis of ICH from Get With The Guidelines®(GWTG) Stroke regional registry between January 2018 to May 2019 (8 month pre and 8 months post-implementation) and consisting of 16 Primary Stroke Centers (PSCs) and 8 CSCs. We analyzed LKW-arrival times to compare median times in the pre- vs. post-implementation periods. Results: There were 501 ICH cases in the pre-implementation period (mean age 66, 43.3% Black, and 52.3% male) and 548 in the post-implementation period (mean age 66, 41.0% Black, and 54.3% male). In the post-implementation period, median LKW to hospital arrival time was 255 minutes vs. 270.5minutes in the pre-implementation period (P value 0.029). LKW to hospital arrival times for those patients arriving from EMS decreased from a median 112.5 minutes to 81 minutes (P value 0.034). Conclusions: A prehospital direct-to-CSC transport protocol resulted in a substantial decrease in the median LKW to hospital arrival times for ICH patients, driven especially by EMS-arriving patients. Prehospital protocols could increase access to time sensitive life-saving therapies for ICH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.